Advertisement

A Posteriori Phase Corrections to the Parabolic Equation

  • David J. Thomson
  • David H. Wood

Abstract

A method is described for transforming numerical solutions of the Tappert and Hardin (1974) parabolic equation of ocean acoustics into solutions of the Helmholtz equation. For range-independent media, the phase errors inherent in parabolic equation predictions of oceanic waveguide sound propagation are removed exactly. The method is based on an integral transform established by DeSanto (1977). It is shown that the field satisfying the Helmholtz equation can be obtained from the Fourier transform of the field satisfying the parabolic equation via fast field program (FFP) techniques. Numerical examples are presented to illustrate this post-processing approach to parabolic phase error correction.

Keywords

Parabolic Equation Helmholtz Equation Helmholtz Equation Wavenumber Domain Ocean Acoustics 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brock, H. K., Buchal, R. N., and Spofford, C. W., 1977, Modifying the sound-speed profile to improve the accuracy of the parabolic- equation technique, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 62: 543.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Davis, JA., White, D., and Cavanagh, RC., 1982, NORDA Parabolic equation workshop, 31 March-3 April 1981, NORDA Tech. Note 143.Google Scholar
  3. DeSanto, J. A., 1977, Relation between the solution of the Helmholtz and parabolic equation for sound propagation, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 62: 295.MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DeSanto, J. A., Perkins, J. S., and Baer, R. N., 1978, A correction to the parabolic equation, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 64: 1664.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DiNapoli, F. R. and Deavenport, R. L., 1980, Theoretical and numerical Green’s function field solution in a plane multilayered media, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 67: 92.MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lee, D ., 1984, The state-of-the-art parabolic equation approximation as applied to underwater acoustic propagation with discussions on intensive computations, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Suppl. 1, 76:S9; reprinted as NUSC Tech. Doc. 7247.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Polyanskii, E. A., 1974, Relationship between the solutions of the Helmholtz and Schrodinger equations, Sov. Phys. Acoust., 20: 90.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Schmidt, H. and Jensen, F. B., 1985, Efficient numerical solution technique for wave propagation in horizontally stratified environments, Comp. & Maths, with Appls., 11: 699.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Tappert, F. D., 1977, The parabolic approximation method, in: “Wave Propagation and Underwater Acoustics,” J. B. Keller and J. S. Papadakis, eds., Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Tappert, F. D. and Hardin, R. H., 1974, Computer simulation of long-range ocean acoustic propagation using the parabolic equation method, Proc. 8th Intern. Cong. on Acoustics, 2: 452.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • David J. Thomson
    • 1
  • David H. Wood
    • 2
  1. 1.Defence Research Establishment PacificFMO VictoriaUSA
  2. 2.Naval Underwater Systems CenterNew LondonUSA

Personalised recommendations