Ultrasound pp 105-116 | Cite as

Interaction Mechanisms: Non-Thermal, Non-Cavitational Effects

  • Gail ter Haar

Abstract

The way in which ultrasound interacts with tissue is conventionally divided into three classes of mechanisms - thermal, cavitational, and non-thermal, non-cavitational. Heating and cavitation are covered elsewhere in this volume (see chapters by W.L. Nyborg and E. Carstensen in this volume).

Keywords

Torque Luminal Cavitation Compressibility Crest 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Crum, L.A., 1971, Acoustic force on a liquid droplet in an acoustic stationary wave. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 50:157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dunn, F., 1985, Cellular inactivation by heat and shear. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 24:131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dyson, M., Pond, J.B., Woodward, B., Broadbent, J., 1974, The production of blood cell stasis and endothelial damage in the blood vessels of chick embryos treated with ultrasound in a stationary wave field. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 1:133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eller, A.I., 1968, Force on a bubble in a standing acoustic wave. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 43:170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Embleton, T.F.W., 1962, Mutual interaction between two spheres in a plane sound field. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 34:1714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gershoy, A., Nyborg, W.L., 1973, Microsonation of cells under near threshold conditions, in “Proc. Second World Congress on Ultrasonics in Medicine”. Rotterdam 1973, (Int. Congress Series No. 309, ISBN 90 219 01870; Excerpta Medical Amsterdam 1974) pp. 360–365.Google Scholar
  7. Gould, R.K. & Coakley, W.T., 1974, The effects of acoustic force on small particles in suspension. in Proc. Symp. Finite wave effects in fluids. IPC Science and Tech. Press, Lyngby, Denmark.Google Scholar
  8. ter Haar, G.R., 1977, The effect of ultrasound standing wave fields on the flow of particles, with special reference to biological media. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
  9. ter Haar, G.R., Dyson, M., Smith, S.P., 1979, Ultrastructural changes in the mouse uterus brought about by ultrasonic irradiation at therapeutic intensities in standing wave fields. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 5:167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ter Haar, G.R., Wyard, S.J., 1978, Blood cell banding in ultrasonic standing wave fields: a physical analysis. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 4:111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Miller, D.L., 1983, The botanical effects of ultrasound: a review. Env. & Exp. Botany, 23:1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nyborg, W.L., 1965, Acoustic streaming, in “Physical Acoustics” Vol. IIB Ch.ll. Ed. W.P. Mason, Academic Press, London/New York.Google Scholar
  13. Nyborg, W.L., 1967, Radiation pressure on a small rigid sphere. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 42:947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nyborg, W.L., 1978, Physical mechanisms for biological effects of ultrasound. HEW Publication (FDA) 78–8062.Google Scholar
  15. Rooney, J.A., 1970, Hemolysis near an ultrasonically pulsating gas bubble. Science, 169:869.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Starrit, H.C., Perkins, M.A., Duck, F.A., Humphrey, V.F., 19 85, Evidence for ultrasonic finit amplitude distortion in muscle using medical equipment. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77:302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gail ter Haar
    • 1
  1. 1.Physics DepartmentInstitute of Cancer ResearchSutton, SurreyUK

Personalised recommendations