Advertisement

Learning Disabilities

New Perspectives from an Educational Specialist
  • Dorothy Kletzkin

Abstract

The cognitive development of the child identified as “learning disabled” has been the subject of varying hypotheses, considerable research, and controversy, for many decades. Interest in learning disabilities has been sparked by concerns of parents and professionals that some children may have difficulty acquiring and applying information presented in the traditional academic environment. In 1970, the United States Office of Education defined children with specific learning disabilities as

Those children who have a disorder in one of the more basic psychological processes involved in understanding, or in using language, spoken or written, which disorder may manifest itself in imperfectability to listen, think, speak, read, write, spell or do mathematical calculations. Such disorders include perceptual handicaps, brain injury, minimal brain dysfunction, dyslexia, and developmental asphasia. Such terms do not include children who have learning problems which are primarily the result of visual, hearing or motor handicaps, of mental retardation, or of emotional disadvantages.1

Keywords

Left Hemisphere Learn Disability Developmental Dyslexia Evoke Potential Dichotic Listening 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    United States Office of Education: Better Education for the Handicapped: Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1969. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1970.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    U.S. Education for All Handicapped Children Act for Public Law 94-142: U.S. Office of Education. Federal Register 42 (No. 230), 52404–52407, 1976.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cruickshank, W. M.: When winter comes can spring? Exceptional Child 25: 3–25, 1978.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cruickshank, W. M.: Learning Disabilities. A Definitional Statement. Unpublished manuscript. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1981.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Orton, S. T.: Reading, Writing and Speech Problems in Children. Norton, New York, 1937.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vandenberg, S. G.: Comparative studies of multiple factor ability measures, in Royce, JR (ed.): Multivariate Analyses and Psychological Theory. Academic, New York, 1973, pp. 149–202.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Calanchini, P. R., and Traut, S. S.: The neurology of learning disabilities, in Tarpolin, L. (ed.): Learning Disorders in Children: Diagnosis, Medication, Education. Little, Brown, Boston, 1971, pp. 207–251.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Strauss, A. A., and Lehtinen, L. E.: Psychopathology and Education of the Brain Injured Child. Grune & Stratton, New York, 1947.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kephart, N. C.: The Slow Learner in the Classroom. Merrill, Columbus, Ohio, 1960.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Getman, G. N.: The visual motor complex in the acquisition of learning skills, in Hellmuth, J. (ed.): Learning Disorders, Vol. 1. Special Child Publications, Seattle, 1965, pp. 49–76.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cruickshank, W. M.: Learning Disabilities in Home, School and Community. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, New York, 1977.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barsch, R. H.: Enriching Perception and Cognition, Vol. 2. Special Child Publications, Seattle, 1968.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Frostig, M., Lifever, D. W., and Whittlesey, J. R.: A developmental test of visual perception for evaluating normal and neurologically handicapped children. Percept. Mot. Skills 12: 382–394, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kirk, S. A., and Kirk, W. D.: Psycholinguistic Learning Disabilities, Diagnosis and Remediation. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1976.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johnson, D. L., and Myklebust, H. R.: Learning Disabilities: Educational Principles and Practices. Grune & Stratton, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Arter, J. A., and Jenkins, J. R.: Differential diagnosis—prescriptive teaching: A critical appraisal. Rev. Educ. Res. 49: 517 - 555, 1979.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dunn, L. M.: Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, Minnesota, 1959.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Roach, E. G., and Kephart, N. C.: The Purdue Perceptual Motor Survey. Merrill, Columbus, Ohio, 1966.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Benton, A. L.: Benton Visual Retention Test, rev. ed. Psychological Corporation, New York, 1955.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goldman, R., Fristoe, M., and Woodcock, R. W.: Goldman-Fristoe-Woodcock Test of Auditory Discrimination. American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, Minnesota, 1970.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kirk, S. A.: Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Activities. The Diagnosis of Evaluation of Psycholinguistic Disabilities. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1966.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hammill, D. D., and Larsen, S. C.: The effectiveness of psycholinguistic training. Except. Child. 41: 39–44, 1972.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hammill, D. D.: Training visual perceptual processes. J. Learning Disabilities 5: 39–44, 1972.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Boder, E.: Developmental dyslexia. A diagnostic approach based on three atypical reading-spelling patterns. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 15: 663–687, 1973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mattis, S., French, J. H., and Rapin, I.: Dyslexia in children and young adults: Three independent neuropsychological syndromes. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 17: 150–163, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Morrison, F. J., Giordiani, B., and Nagy, I.: Learning disability: An informational processing analysis. Science 196: 77–79, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Satz, P., and Fletcher, J. M.: Minimal brain dysfunctions: An appraisal of research concepts and methods, in Rie, H. E., and Rie, E. D. (eds.): Handbook of Minimal Brain Dysfunction: A Critical Review. Wiley, New York, 1980, pp. 669–714.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kinsbourne, M.: Minimal brain dysfunction as a neurodevelopmental lag. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 205: 268–273, 1973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rourke, B. P.: Issues in the neuropsychological assessment of children with learning disabilities. Can. Psychol. Rev. 18: 89–102, 1976.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Petrauskas, A. J., and Rourke, B. P.: Identification of subgroups of retarded readers. A neuropsychological, multivariate approach. J. Clin. Neuropsychol. 11: 17–37, 1979.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pirozzalo, F. J.: The neuropsychology of Developmental Reading Disorder. Praeger, New York, 1979.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM III), 3rd ed. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, D.C., 1980.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gall, J. F.: Sur les fonctions du cerveau et celles de chacune de ses parties. Balliere, Paris, 1925.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Broca, P.: Remarks on the seat of the faculty of articulate language, followed by and observation of aphemia, in Bonin, G. von (trans.): Some papers on the cerebral cortex. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois, 1960. Reprinted from Bull. Soc. Anat. Paris 6: 330–357, 1961.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fritsch, G., and Hitzig, E.: On the electrical excitability of the cerebrum, in G., von Bonin (trans.): Some Papers on the Cerebral Cortex. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois. 1960. Reprinted from Arch. Anat. 37: 300–323, 1970.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Levy, J.: Psychobiological implications of bilateral asymmetry, in Dimond, S. J., and Beamont, J. (eds.): Hemisphere Function in the Human Brain. Halsted, New York, 1974, pp. 121–183.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jackson, J. H.: On the nature of the duality of the brain. Brain 38: 80–103, 1915. Reprinted from Med. Press Circ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Piercy, M.: Studies of the neurological basis of intellectual function, in Williams, D. (ed.): Modern Trends in Neurology. Butterworth, London, 1967, pp. 775–790.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Myers, R. E., and Sperry, R. W.: Interhemispheric communication through the corpus callosum. Arch. Neurol. Psychiatry 80: 298–303, 1958.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bogen, J. E., Fisher, E. D., and Vogel, J. P.: Cerebral commissurotomy. A second case report. J.A.M.A. 194: 1328–1329, 1965.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bogen, J.: The other side of the brain: The oppositional mind. Bull. L.A. Neurol. Soc. 34: 135–162, 1969.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sperry, R. W.: Hemisphere deconnection and unity of conscious awareness. Am. Psychol. 23: 723–733, 1968.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sperry, R. W., Gazzaniga, M. E., and Bogen, J. E.: Interhemispheric relationships: The neocortical commissures, syndrome of hemispheric disconnection, in Vinken, P. S., and Bruyn, G. W. (eds.): Handbook of Clinical Neurology, Vol. 4: Disorders of Speech, Perception and Symbolic Behavior. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1969, pp. 273–290.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kimura, D.: Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Can. J. Psychol. 15: 156–165, 1961.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rizzalatti, G., Umilta, C., and Berlucci, G.: Opposite superiorities of the right and left cerebral hemispheres in discrimination reaction time to physiognomical and alphabetical material. Brain 94: 431–442, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Galin, D., and Ornstein, R.: Lateral specialization of cognitive mode: An EEG study. Psychophysiology 9: 412–418, 1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Glass, A., and Butler, S. R.: Asymmetries in suppression of alpha rhythm possibly related to cerebral dominance. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 34: 729, 1973.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Duffy, F. H., Burchfield, J. L., and Sombroso, C. T.: Brain electrical activity mapping (BEAM): A method for extending the clinical utility of EEG and evoked potential data. Ann. Neurol. 8: 309–321, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Duffy, F. H., Bartels, P. H., and Burchfield, J. I.: Significance probability mapping: An aid to the topographic analysis of brain electrical analysis activity. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 51: 455–462, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Baker, H. I., Houser, O. W., Campbell, J. K., et al.: Computerized tomography of the head. J.A.M.A. 233: 1304–1308, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Krammer, D. M., Schneider, J. S., Rudim, A. M., et al.: True three dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance zeugmatographic images of a human brain. Neuroradiology 21: 239–244, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Yarowski, P. J., and Ingemar, D. H.: Symposium summary. Neuronal activity and energy metabolism. Fed. Proc. 40: 2342–2362, 1982.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Galaburda, A. M.: La région de Broca: Observations anatomiques faites un siecle après la mort de son découvreur. Rev. Neurol. (Paris) 136: 609, 1980.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Eidelberg, D., and Galaburda, A. M.: Symmetry and asymmetry in the human posterior thalmus. I. Cytoarchietectonic analyses in normal persons. Arch. Neurol. 39: 325–332, 1982.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Zaidel, A.: The split brain and half brains as models of congenital language disability, in Ludlow, C. L., and Doran Quine, M. E. (eds.): The Neurological Basis of Language Disorders in Children: Methods and Directions for Research. NINCDS Monograph No. 79–440. U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Bethesda, 1980, pp. 55–86.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Witelson, S. F.: Brain lateralization in children: Normal and dyslexic, in Lateralization of Brain Functions. Boerhaave Commission, Leidem, Netherlands, 1975, pp. 122–146.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Gordon, H. W.: The learning disabled are cognitively right. Top. Learning Learning Disabilities 3: 29–39, 1983.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Pirozzalo, F. J., and Rayner, K.: Cerebral organization and reading disability. Neuropsychologia 17: 485–489, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kletzkin, D.: Electroencephalographic, Neurological and Psychometric Correlates of Right and Left Cerebral Hemisphere Functions in on Grade and Below Grade Elementary School Boys. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 1980.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hiscock, M., and Kinsbourne, M. Asymmetries of selective-listening and attention switching in children. Dev. Psychol. 16: 70–82, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hynd, G. H., Obrzud, J. E., Weed, J., et al.: Development of cerebral dominance. Dichotic listening asymmetry in normal and learning disabled children. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 28: 445–454, 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Galaburda, A. M., and Kemper, T. L.: Cytoarchitectonic abnormalities in developmental dyslexia: A case study. Ann. Neurol. 6: 94–100, 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Geschwind, H., and Behan, P.: Left handedness association with immune disease, mirgraine and developmental learning disorder. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (U.S.A.) 79: 5907, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Torgensen, J. K.: Learning disabilities theory: Its current state and future prospects. J. Learning Disabilities 19: 399–407, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dorothy Kletzkin
    • 1
  1. 1.Section of Learning Disabilities, Institute for Child DevelopmentHackensack Medical CenterHackensackUSA

Personalised recommendations