Abstract
Uzzell: Some concepts presented during this Conference include the recognition that: 1) theories about plasticity encompass individual differences in response to changes or demands within a particular context; 2) the effects of psychopharmacological agents are different for brain damaged and non-brain damaged individuals; 3) outcomes of cognitive rehabilitation are different for mild and severe head trauma; 4) 27% of the brain damaged population is not testable; and 5) recovery patterns among brain damaged individuals are inconsistent. However, rehabilitation of specialized programs have been shown to be cost-effective.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Uzzell, B.P., Christensen, AL. (1988). Panel Discussion of Rehabilitation. In: Christensen, AL., Uzzell, B.P. (eds) Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1741-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1741-8_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9801-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-1741-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive