Rehabilitation in Traumatic Brain Injury — Observations on the Current US Scene
Dr. Howard Rusk, a major figure in the field of rehabilitation medicine in the United States, defined rehabilitation as the third phase of medical care designed to deliver services to accommodate the needs and optimize functioning in the physical, psychological, vocational and social areas for the individual with enduring impairments and disabilities due to disease or trauma. Dr. Rusk’s insight did not predicate a particular technical or theoretical breakthrough or the development of a new diagnostic technique or therapy. Rather, it was based on the idea of organizing all the services needed to help the individual, in a way to meet the convenience of the patient and enhance utilization. While this idea hardly seems novel now, it should be recalled that in the United States it emerged at the time of World War II. It revolutionized delivery of services to the disabled in a way similar to the introduction of the supermarket. The supermarket was not designed to create new products. It was designed to make shopping more convenient for the consumer.
KeywordsNeurol Metaphor Aphasia Hane
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Nagi, S.Z., 1965. Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In: M.B. Sussman (Ed) Sociology and Rehabilitation, Washington, D.C. American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
- 4.Lezak, M.D., 1983. Neuropsychological assessment, (2nd ed) New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 5.Levin, H.S., Benton, A.L., and Grossman, R.G., 1982. Neurobehavioral Consequences of Closed Head Injury. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 9.Kay, T., Ezrachi, M O. and Cavallo, M. 1986. Plateaus and consistencies: Long term neuropsychological changes following head trauma. In: Proceedings of the 94th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, p. 175.Google Scholar
- 11.Diller, L. and Ben-Yishay, Y., 1983. Severe Head Trauma: A comprehensive approach to rehabilitation. Final Report, Washington, D.C. — National Institute of Handicapped Research, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
- 12.Hart, T. and Hayden, M.E., 1986. The ecological validity of neuropsychological assessment and remediation. In: B.P. Uzzell and Y. Gross (Ed) Clinical Neuropsychology of Intervention. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishing Co.Google Scholar
- 13.Nagele, D.A., 1986. Neuropsychological inference from a tooth-brushing task: A model for understanding deficits and making interventions. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 66–68.Google Scholar
- 14.Ben-Yishay, Y., Silver, S.L., Piasetsky, E. and associates, 1987. Vocational outcomes after intensive holistic cognitive rehabilitation: Results of a seven year study. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 1, 90–99.Google Scholar
- 15.Hoofien, D. and Ben-Yishay, Y., 1982. Neuropsychological therapeutic community rehabilitation of severely brain injured adults. In: E. Lahar (Ed) Psychological Research in Rehabilitation. Israel Ministry of Defense Publishing House, 87–99.Google Scholar
- 16.Prigatano, G. et al, 1985. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation After Brain Injury. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar