Advertisement

Rehabilitation in Traumatic Brain Injury — Observations on the Current US Scene

  • Leonard Diller

Abstract

Dr. Howard Rusk, a major figure in the field of rehabilitation medicine in the United States, defined rehabilitation as the third phase of medical care designed to deliver services to accommodate the needs and optimize functioning in the physical, psychological, vocational and social areas for the individual with enduring impairments and disabilities due to disease or trauma. Dr. Rusk’s insight did not predicate a particular technical or theoretical breakthrough or the development of a new diagnostic technique or therapy. Rather, it was based on the idea of organizing all the services needed to help the individual, in a way to meet the convenience of the patient and enhance utilization. While this idea hardly seems novel now, it should be recalled that in the United States it emerged at the time of World War II. It revolutionized delivery of services to the disabled in a way similar to the introduction of the supermarket. The supermarket was not designed to create new products. It was designed to make shopping more convenient for the consumer.

Keywords

Traumatic Brain Injury Cognitive Remediation Severe Head Trauma Social Area Conventional Rehabilitation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sarno, M.T., Buonaguro, A., and Levita, E., 1987. Aphasia in closed head injury and stroke. Aphasiology, 1, 331–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nagi, S.Z., 1965. Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In: M.B. Sussman (Ed) Sociology and Rehabilitation, Washington, D.C. American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gordon, W.A., Hibbard, M.R., Egelko, S., Diller, L., Shaver, M.S., Lieberman, A., and Ragnarsson, K., 1985. Perceptual remediation in patients with right brain damage. A comprehensive program. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,66, 353–359.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lezak, M.D., 1983. Neuropsychological assessment, (2nd ed) New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Levin, H.S., Benton, A.L., and Grossman, R.G., 1982. Neurobehavioral Consequences of Closed Head Injury. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rimel, R.W., Giordani, B., Barth, J.T., and Jane, J., 1983. Moderate head injury: completing the clinical spectrum of brain trauma. Neurosurgery, 11, 344–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dikmen, S., McLean, A., Temkin, and Wyler, A.R., 1986. Neuropsychologic outcome at one month post injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,67, 507–513.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dikmen, S., Reitan, R.M. and Temkin, N.R., 1983. Neuropsychological recovery in head injury. Archives of Neurology,40, 333–338.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kay, T., Ezrachi, M O. and Cavallo, M. 1986. Plateaus and consistencies: Long term neuropsychological changes following head trauma. In: Proceedings of the 94th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, p. 175.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kalisky, Z., Morrison, D.P., Meyers, C.A. and Von Laufen, A. 1985. Medical problems encountered during rehabilitation of patients with head injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,66, 25–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Diller, L. and Ben-Yishay, Y., 1983. Severe Head Trauma: A comprehensive approach to rehabilitation. Final Report, Washington, D.C. — National Institute of Handicapped Research, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hart, T. and Hayden, M.E., 1986. The ecological validity of neuropsychological assessment and remediation. In: B.P. Uzzell and Y. Gross (Ed) Clinical Neuropsychology of Intervention. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nagele, D.A., 1986. Neuropsychological inference from a tooth-brushing task: A model for understanding deficits and making interventions. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 66–68.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ben-Yishay, Y., Silver, S.L., Piasetsky, E. and associates, 1987. Vocational outcomes after intensive holistic cognitive rehabilitation: Results of a seven year study. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 1, 90–99.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hoofien, D. and Ben-Yishay, Y., 1982. Neuropsychological therapeutic community rehabilitation of severely brain injured adults. In: E. Lahar (Ed) Psychological Research in Rehabilitation. Israel Ministry of Defense Publishing House, 87–99.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Prigatano, G. et al, 1985. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation After Brain Injury. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leonard Diller
    • 1
  1. 1.Rusk Institute of Rehabilitation MedicineUniversity Medical CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations