Abstract
The meeting began with an informal meeting and a very candid appraisal of the lack of a dominant leadership in urologic pathology and of the individualization of prostate histopathology in particular. Subsequent formal discussion centered around the striking individualization of diagnostic concepts and criteria for prostate cancer. There was a discussion of the idea suggested by Dr. Miller that the subcommittee might consider developing a glossary or illustrated dictionary of prostate histopathology with multiple grading systems. This could be available as an aid for diagnostic terminology. After a lengthy analysis of potential and realistic goals, it became evident that the best strategy would be to try to reach the largest audience of workers in the field. The best tactic in this regard was thought to be an influence of the urology/pathology literature perhaps through editorial policy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gardner, W.A. et al. (1988). Excerpts of Minutes of Prostate Cancer Working Group Committee Meeting on Diagnostic Nomenclature, February 11, 1987, Cross Keys Inn, Baltimore, Maryland. In: Coffey, D.S., Resnick, M.I., Dorr, F.A., Karr, J.P. (eds) A Multidisciplinary Analysis of Controversies in the Management of Prostate Cancer. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1667-1_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1667-1_29
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8925-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-1667-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive