Skip to main content

Abstract

The choice of the optimal design of investigational or commercially available cytotoxic agents for clinical trials in patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer has long been a considerable methodologic problem. The conventional endpoints for measuring therapeutic activity in solid tumors are infrequently applicable in prostate cancer. Several definitions of response have been developed which attempt to accurately identify agents with meaningful clinical activity. While promising preliminary results for chemotherapeutic agents have been reported using the various response criteria, these results have not been confirmed. When restudied no agents have been identified that could be considered standard therapy for this disease. Consistent response rates in excess of 20 percent have not been observed for any therapy in hormone refractory prostate cancer. Additionally, no survival benefit has been seen with any cytotoxic therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greenwald, P. and Sondik, E.J. (eds), Cancer Control Objectives for the Nation: 1985–2000, in: “NCI Monographs,” No. 2, Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, pp 3–93, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eisenberger, M.A., Simon, R., O’Dwyer, P.J., Wittes, R.E. and Friedman, M.A. A re-evaluation of nonhormonal cytotoxic chemotherapy in the treatment of prostatic carcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 3:827–841, 1985.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Crawford, D. A comparison of leuprolide with leuprolide and flutamide in previously untreated patients with clinical Stage D2 cancer of the prostate. San Antonio: Southwest Oncology Group, pp 1–16, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  4. O’Bryan, R.M., Luce, J.K., Talley, R.W., Gottlieb, J.A., Baker, L.H. and Bonnadona, G. Phase II evaluation of adriamycin in human neoplasia. Cancer 32:1–8, 1973.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Bryan, R.M., Baker, L.H., Gottleib, J.E., Rivkin, S.E., Balcerzak, S.P., Grumet, G.N., Salmon, S.E., Moon T.E. and Hoogstraten, B. Dose response evaluation of adriamycin in human neoplasia. Cancer 39: 1940–1948, 1977.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Torti, F.M., Aston, D., Lum, B.L., Kohler, M., Williams, R., Spaulding, J.T., Shortliffe, L. and Freiha, F.S. Weekly doxorubicin in endocrine-refractory carcinoma of the prostate. J. Clin. Oncol. 1:477–482, 1983.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Scher, H., Yagoda, A., Watson, R.C., Serber, M. and Whitmore, W. Phase II trial of doxorubicin in bidimensionally measurable prostatic adenocarcinoma. J. Urol. 131:1099–1102, 1984.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Izbicki, R.M., Amer, M.H. and Al-Sarraf, M. Combination of adriamycin and cyclophosphamide in the treatment of metastatic prostatic carcinoma: A Phase II study. Cancer Treatment Report 63:999–1001, 1979.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ihde, D.C., Bunn, P.A., Cohen, M.H., Dunnick, N.R., Eddy, J.L. and Minna, J.D. Effective treatment of hormonally-unresponsive metastatic carcinoma of the prostate with adriamycin and cyclophosphamide. Cancer 45:1300–1310, 1980.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Merrin, C., Etra, W., Wajsman, Z., Baumgartner, G. and Murphy, G. Chemotherapy of advanced carcinoma of the prostate with fluo-rouracil, cyclophosphamide, and adriamycin. J. Urol. 115:86-88, 1976.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lloyd, R.E., Jones, S.E., Salmon, S.E., Durie, B.G.M. and McMahon, L.J. Combination chemotherapy with adriamycin (NSC-123127) and cyclophosphamide (NSC-26271) for solid tumors: A Phase II trial. Cancer Treatment Report 60:77–83, 1976.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Soloway, M.S., Shippel, R.M. and Ikard, M. Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride and 5-fluorouracil in advanced carcinoma of the prostate. J. Urol. 122:637–639, 1979.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Slack, N.H., Mittleman, A., Brady, M.F. and Murphy, G P. The importance of the stable category for chemotherapy treated patients with advanced and relapsing prostate cancer. Cancer 46:2393–2402, 1980.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dorr, F.A., Friedman, M.A. (1988). Clinical Trial Design for Cytotoxics in Prostate Cancer. In: Coffey, D.S., Resnick, M.I., Dorr, F.A., Karr, J.P. (eds) A Multidisciplinary Analysis of Controversies in the Management of Prostate Cancer. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1667-1_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1667-1_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8925-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-1667-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics