Skip to main content

Abstract

Total androgen blockade, which consists of the inhibition of action of all androgens, has been described (1). On the basis of an open clinical trial, it was claimed that total androgen blockade gives much better results than simple testicular androgen ablation in metastatic prostate cancer and that it represents the only acceptable form of treatment of that disease (2). In order to test this claim, which is not supported by all investigators (3), a double-blind, randomized study comparing these two modes of treatment was initiated. Testicular androgen suppression is usually obtained by the administration of estrogens or LHRH agonists, or by orchiectomy. We feel that this last method is the safest, the simplest and the most reliable. It is independent of patient compliance and has no unexpected side effects or serious complications. It also avoids the possible flare which may have a deleterious effect (4–6). The suppression of action of other androgens at the level of the prostatic cell is obtained by administration of an antiandrogen (7–9).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Geller, J. and Albert J. The case for total androgen blockade in the management of metastatic prostate cancer, in: “The Management of Prostate Cancer,” D.S. Coffey, M. Resnick, A. Dorr and J. Karr (eds.), Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Labrie, F., Dupont, A. and Belanger, A. Complete androgen blockade for the treatment of prostate cancer, in “Important Advances in Oncology 1985”, V.T. De Vita, S. Hellman and S.A. Rosenberg, eds., Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schulze, H., Oesterling, J.E., Isaacs, J. and Coffey D. Hormonal therapy of prostate cancer: limitations in the total androgen ablation concept, in: “The Management of Prostate Cancer”, D.S. Coffey, M. Resnick, A. Dorr and J. Karr (eds.), Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Santen, R.J., Warner, B., Demers, L.M., Dufau, M. and Smith J. Use of GnRH hormone agonists analogs, in “LHRH and its Analogs - A New Clas’s of Contraceptive and Therapeutic Agents”, B. Vickery, J.J. Nestor and E.S.E. Hafez, eds., MTP Press, Boston, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Trachtenberg, J. The treatment of metastatic prostatic cancer with a potent luteinizing hormone - releasing hormone analogue. J. Urol. 129:1149–1152, 1983.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. The Leuprolide Study Group Leuprolide versus diethylstilbestrol for metastatic prostate cancer. New Engl. J. Med. pp. 1281- 1286, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Neumann, F. and Schenck, B. New antiandrogens and their mode of action. J. Reprod. Fértil. 24:129–145, 1976.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Irwin, R.J. and Prout, Jr., G.J. A new antiprostatic agent for treatment of prostate carcinoma. Surg. Forum 24:536–538, 1973.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Raynaud, J.P., Bonne, C., Bouton, M.M., Lagace, L. and Labrie, F. Action of a nonsteroidal antiandrogen RU 23908 in peripheral and central tissues. J. Steroid Biochem. 11:93–99, 1979.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Moguilewsky, Fiet, J., Tournemine C. and Raynaud, J.P. Pharmacology of an antiandrogen, Anandron, used as an adjuvant therapy in the treatment of prostate cancer. J. Steroid Biochem. 24:139–146, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Burton, S., and Trachtenberg, J. Effectiveness of antiandrogens in the rat. J. Urol. 136:932–935, 1986.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Beland, G., Elhilali, M., Fradet, Y., Laroche, B., Ramsey, E.W., Venner, P.M., and Tewari, H.D. Total androgen blockade versus orchiectomy in Stage D2 prostate cancer, in: “Progress in Clinical and Biological Research”, 243A:391–400, 1987.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Labrie, F., Dupont, A., Belanger, A., Poyet, P., Giguere, M., Lacoursiere, Y., Emond, J., Monfette, G. and Borsayi, J.P. Combined treatment with flutamide and surgical or medical(LHRH agonist) castration in metastatic prostatic cancer. The Lancet 4:48–49, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Emrich, L.J., Priore, R.L. and investigators of the NPCP. Prognostic factors in patients with advanced stage prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 45:5173–5179, 1985.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beland, G. (1988). Comparison of Total Androgen Blockade and Orchiectomy in Metastatic Cancer of Prostate. In: Coffey, D.S., Resnick, M.I., Dorr, F.A., Karr, J.P. (eds) A Multidisciplinary Analysis of Controversies in the Management of Prostate Cancer. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1667-1_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1667-1_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8925-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-1667-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics