Abstract
My recommendations as to the insanity defense are not yet complete. In Chapters 10 and 11 the focus was on the law—on defining legally the essence of insanity in a psychologically intelligible way, which includes culpability for bringing about the disability of mind, and on writing test instructions and procedures for adjudicating the matter fairly and coherently. What has been left out, and what still remains, is the matter of the psychological expert. What role is the psychological expert to play during the insanity drama and after?
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Finkel, N.J. (1988). Law and Psychology—The Courtship Reconsidered. In: Insanity on Trial. Perspectives in Law & Psychology, vol 8. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1665-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1665-7_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8924-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-1665-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive