Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science ((SECS,volume 88))

  • 117 Accesses

Abstract

In the previous chapter we discussed testing methods for combinational dynamic CMOS circuits. In this chapter we will concentrate on combinational static CMOS circuits. Test generation for a static CMOS circuit, as in the case of a dynamic CMOS circuit, can be done from either its gate-level model or its transistor-level description. We will discuss both the approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. Agrawal and S. M. Reddy, “Test generation at MOS level,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Computers, Systems & Signal Processing, Bangalore, India, Dec. 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Agrawal, “Test generation at the switch level,” in Proc. Int. Conf Computer-Aided Design, Santa Clara, CA, pp. 128–130, Nov. 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Chandramouli, “On testing stuck-open faults,” in Proc. Int. Symp. Fault-Tolerant Comput., Milan, Italy, pp. 258–265, June 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Chiang and Z. G. Vranesic, “On fault detection in CMOS logic networks,” in Proc. Design Automation Conf., Miami Beach, FL, pp. 50–55, June 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Galiay, Y. Crouzet, and M. Vergniault, “Physical versus logical fault models in MOS LSI circuits: Impact on their testability,” IEEE Trans. Comput., vol. C-29, pp. 527–531, June 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. K. Jain and V. D. Agrawal, “Test generation for MOS circuits using D-Algorithm,” in Proc. Design Automation Conf., Miami Beach, FL, pp. 64–70, June 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. K. Jain and V. D. Agrawal, “Modeling and test generation algorithms for MOS circuits,” IEEE Trans. Comput., vol. C-34, pp. 426–433, May 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. N. K. Jha, “Multiple stuck-open fault detection in CMOS logic circuits,” IEEE Trans. Comput., vol. 37, pp. 426–432, Apr. 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. N. K. Jha, “Robust testing of CMOS logic circuits,” Int. J. Computers & Electrical Engg., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 19–28, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Z. Kohavi, Switching and Finite Automata Theory, McGraw-Hill, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Y. Lo, H. N. Nham, and A. K. Bose, “A data structure for MOS circuits,” in Proc. Design Automation Conf., Miami Beach, FL, pp. 619–624, June 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. M. Reddy, M. K. Reddy, and J. G. Kuhl, “On testable design for CMOS logic circuits,” in Proc. Int. Test Conf., Philadelphia, PA, pp. 435–445, Oct. 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. M. Reddy, V. D. Agrawal, and S. K. Jain, “A gate-level model for CMOS combinational logic circuits with application to fault detection,” in Proc. Design Automation Conf., Albuquerque, NM, pp. 504–509, June 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. M. Reddy, M. K. Reddy, and V. D. Agrawal, “Robust tests for stuck-open faults in CMOS combinational logic circuits,” in Proc. Int. Symp. Fault-Tolerant Comput., Orlando, FL, pp. 44–49, June 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. K. Reddy, S. M. Reddy, and P. Agrawal, “Transistor level test generation for MOS circuits,” in Proc. Design Automation Conf., Las Vegas, pp. 825–828, June 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. M. Reddy and M. K. Reddy, “Testable realizations for FET stuck-open faults in CMOS combinational logic circuits,” IEEE Trans. Comput., vol. C-35, pp. 742–754, Aug. 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J. P. Roth, “Diagnosis of automata failures: A calculus and a method,” IBM J. Res. & Dev., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 278–291, July 1966.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. H. Shih and J. A. Abraham, “Transistor level test generation for physical failures in CMOS circuits,” in Proc. Design Automation Conf., Las Vegas, pp. 243–249, June 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Weiwei and L. Xieting, “Robust test generation algorithm for stuck-open fault in CMOS circuits,” in Proc. Design Automation Conf., Las Vegas, pp. 236–242, June 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Additional Reading

  1. S. A. Al-Arian and D. P. Agrawal, “Physical failures and fault models of CMOS circuits,” IEEE Trans. Circuits & Systems, vol. CAS-34, no. 3, pp. 269–279, Mar. 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H. H. Chen, R. G. Mathews, and J. A. Newkirk, “Test generation for MOS circuits,” in Proc. Int. Test Conf., Philadelphia, PA, pp. 70–79, Oct. 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Cox and J. Rajski, “A method of fault analysis for test generation and fault diagnosis,” IEEE Trans. CAD, vol. 7, pp. 813–833, July 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Cox and J. Rajski, “Stuck-open and transition fault testing in CMOS complex gates,” in Proc. Int. Test Conf., Washington, D.C., pp. 688–694, Sept. 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Y. M. El-Ziq, “Automatic test generation for stuck-open faults in CMOS VLSI,” in Proc. Design Automation Conf., Nashville, TN, pp. 347–354, June 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Y. M. El-Ziq and R. J. Cloutier, “Functional-level test generation for stuck-open faults in CMOS VLSI,” in Proc. Int. Test Conf., Philadelphia, PA, pp. 536–546, Oct. 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Gupta and N. K. Jha, “A universal test set for CMOS circuits,” IEEE Trans. CAD, vol. 7, pp. 590–597, May 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. K. Jha, “Detecting multiple faults in CMOS circuits,” in Proc. Int. Test Conf., Washington, D.C., pp. 514–519, Sept. 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  9. W.-Y. Koe and S. F. Midkiff, “Circuit simulation of CMOS faults,” in Proc. SOUTHEASTCON, Knoxville, TN, pp. 87–91, Apr. 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Y. K. Malaiya and S. Y. H. Su, “A new model and testing technique for CMOS devices,” in Proc. Int. Test Conf., Philadelphia, PA, pp. 25–34, Oct. 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. Maly and P. Nigh, “Built-in current testing — feasibility study,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Computer-Aided Design, Santa Clara, CA, pp. 340–343, Nov. 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. D. Mandl, “CMOS VLSI challenges to test,” in Proc. Int. Test Conf., Philadelphia, PA, pp. 642–648, Oct. 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Rajski and H. Cox, “Stuck-open fault testing in large CMOS networks by dynamic path tracing,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Computer Design, Port Chester, NY, pp. 252–255, Oct. 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Rajsuman, Y. K. Malaiya, and A. P. Jayasumana, “Limitations of switch-level analysis for bridging faults,” IEEE Trans. CAD, vol. 8, pp. 807–811, July 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Robinson and J. Shen, “Towards a switch-level test pattern generation program,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Computer-Aided Design, Santa Clara, CA, pp. 39–41, Nov. 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H.-C. Shih and J. A. Abraham, “Fault collapsing techniques for MOS VLSI circuits,” in Proc. Int. Symp. Fault-Tolerant Comput., Vienna, Austria, pp. 370–375, June 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jha, N.K., Kundu, S. (1990). Test Generation for Static CMOS Circuits. In: Testing and Reliable Design of CMOS Circuits. The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, vol 88. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1525-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1525-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8818-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-1525-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics