Skip to main content

Semantic Equivalence in Concept Discovery

  • Chapter
Change of Representation and Inductive Bias

Part of the book series: The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science ((SECS,volume 87))

  • 97 Accesses

Abstract

The idea of using invariance, embedded in a description language, in the process of concept discovery was utilized in the COPER system for discovery of physical laws [Kokar, 1986a, 1986b]. It was incorporated in the procedures of COPER, and thus was applicable to the domain of physical laws. This paper presents a step toward construction of a domain-independent module whose goal is to find invariants and utilize them for constructive induction of functional concepts. To this aim, the features of COPER are expressed in the language of algebra, and the algorithm for constructive induction of concepts is described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amarel, S. (1968). On representations of problems of reasoning about actions. Machine Intelligence, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, P., Holte, R., Rendell, L. (1988). Proceedings of the First International Workshop in Change of Representation and Inductive Bias. North American Philips Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drobot, S. (1953). On the foundations of dimensional analysis. Studia Mathematica, 14, 84–89.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kokar, M., M. (1985). On invariance in dimensional analysis. Technical Report MMK-2/85. Boston, MA: Northeastern University, College of Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokar, M., M., (1986a). Discovering functional formulas through changing representation base. Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokar, M., M., (1986b). Determining Arguments of Invariant Functional Descriptions, Machine Learning, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korf, R., E. (1980). Toward a Model of Representation Change. Artificial Intelligence, 14, 41–78.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, M., R. (1988). Invariant Logic: A Calculus for Problem Reformulation. Proceedings of the Seventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Saint Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D. (1978). Dimensionally invariant physical laws correspond to meaningful relations. Philosophy of Science, 45, 1–16.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Manna, Z., Waldinger, R., (1985), The Logical Basis for Computer Programming, vol. 1,:Deductive Reasoning, Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalski, R. S., Carbonell, J. G., Mitchell, T. M., (Eds.), (1983). Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach. Palo Alto, CA: Tioga Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendell, L., A. (1987). More Robust Concept Learning Using Dynamically-Variable Bias. P. Langley (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Machine Learning, Irvine, CA, Morgan Kaufmann Publ., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddle, P. (1988). An Approach to Learning Problem Decomposition Schemas and Iterative Macro-operators. Proceedings of the First International Workshop in Change of Representation and Inductive Bias. North American Philips Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivest, R., L., Shapire, R., E. (1987). A New Approach to Unsupervised Learning in Deterministic Environments. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Machine Learning, Irvine, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian, D., Feigenbaum, J. (1986). Factorization in Experiment Generation. Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utgoff, P., E. (1986). Shift of Bias for Inductive Concept Learning. In R.S. Michalski, J.G. Carbonell, and T.M. Mitchell (Eds.), Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, vol.2, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, H., (1968), The Mathematics of Physical Quantities, part I and II, American Mathematical Monthly, pp. 115–138 and 227–256.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kokar, M.M. (1990). Semantic Equivalence in Concept Discovery. In: Benjamin, D.P. (eds) Change of Representation and Inductive Bias. The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, vol 87. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1523-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1523-0_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8817-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-1523-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics