Introduction: Developmental and Rehabilitative Issues in the Neuropsychology of Everyday Life

  • David E. Tupper
  • Keith D. Cicerone
Part of the Foundations of Neuropsychology book series (FNPS, volume 3)

Abstract

In the earlier volume to this set, contributors addressed some of the fundamental concerns and practices currently raised during neuropsychology’s maturation into a more ecological science, particularly when neuropsychology is considered an assessment or diagnostic discipline. As neuropsychology moves further into an ecological phase of development, other more specific theoretical and practical issues will be brought to light, and nowhere is this more apparent than in the areas of development and rehabilitation.

Keywords

Fatigue Depression Stein Rosen 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acker, M. B. (1986). Relationship between test scores and everyday life functioning. In B. P. Uzzell & Y. Gross (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology of intervention (pp. 85–117). Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  2. Albee, G. W. (1980). A competency model must replace the defect model. In L. A. Bond & J. C. Rosen (Eds.), Competence and coping during adulthood (pp. 75–104). Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
  3. Albert, M. S., & Moss, M. B. (Eds.). (1988). Geriatric neuropsychology. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bakker, D. J. (1984). The brain as a dependent variable. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology 6, 1–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bedrosian, R. C. (1981). Ecological factors in cognitive therapy: The use of significant others. In G. Emery, S. D. Hollon, & R. C. Bedrosian (Eds.), New directions in cognitive therapy (pp. 239–254). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  7. Benedict, R. H. B. (1989). The effectiveness of cognitive remediation strategies for victims of traumatic head-injury: A review of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review 9, 605–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brooks, P. H., & Baumeister, A. A. (1977). A plea for consideration of ecological validity in the experimental psychology of mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 81, 407–416.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chelune, G. J. (1985). Toward a neuropsychological model of everyday functioning. Psychotherapy in Private Practice 3(3), 39–44.Google Scholar
  11. Condeluci, A., & Gretz-Lasky, S. (1987). Social role valorization: A model for community re-entry. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2(1), 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crovitz, H. F. (1989). Memory retraining: Everyday needs and future prospects. In L. W. Poon, D. C. Rubin, & B. A. Wilson (Eds.), Everyday cognition in adulthood and late life (pp. 681–691). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. DeAngelis, T. (1989). Controversy marks child witness meeting. APA Monitor 20(9), September, 1, 8–9.Google Scholar
  14. Diller, L., & Ben-Yishay, Y. (1987). Analyzing rehabilitation outcomes of persons with head injury. In M. J. Fuhrer (Ed.), Rehabilitation outcomes: Analysis and measurement (pp. 209–220). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
  15. Engel, G. E. (1980). The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. American Journal of Psychiatry 137, 535–543.Google Scholar
  16. Fleishman, E. A., & Quaintance, M. K. (1984). Taxonomies of human performance: The description of human tasks. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Friedman, S. L., Scholnick, E. K., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1987). Blueprints for thinking: The role of planning in cognitive development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gogstad, A. C, & Kjellman, A. M. (1976). Rehabilitation prognosis related to clinical and social factors in brain injured of different etiology. Social Science and Medicine 10, 283–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldstein, K. (1939). The organism: A holistic approach to biology derived from pathological data in man. New York: American Book Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haffey, W. J., & Johnston, M. V. (1989). An information system to assess the effectiveness of brain injury rehabilitation. In R. L. Wood & P. Eames (Eds.), Models of brain injury rehabilitation (pp. 205–233). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hart, T., & Hayden, M. E. (1986a). The ecological validity of neuropsychological assessment and remediation. In B. P. Uzzell & Y. Gross (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology of intervention (pp. 21–50). Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  22. Hart, T., & Hayden, M. E. (1986b). Issues in the evaluation of rehabilitation effects. In M. E. Miner & K. A. Wagner (Eds.), Neurotrauma: Treatment, rehabilitation, and related issues (Vol. 1, pp. 197–212). Boston: Butterworths.Google Scholar
  23. Hartlage, L. C.,.& Telzrow, C. F. (Eds.). (1985). The neuropsychology of individual differences: A developmental perspective. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  24. Heaton, R. K., & Pendleton, M. G. (1981). Use of neuropsychological tests to predict adult patients’ everyday functioning. Jon mal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 49(6), 807–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Horton, A. M., Jr., & Sautter, S. W. (1986). Behavioral neuropsychology: Behavioral treatment for the brain-injured. In D. Wedding, A. M. Horton, Jr., & J. Webster (Eds.), The neuropsychology handbook: Behavioral and clinical perspectives (pp. 259–277). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Hynd, G. W., & Willis, W. G. (1988). Pediatric neuropsychology. Orlando: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  27. Kerns, R. D., & Curley, A. D. (1985). A biopsychosocial approach to illness and the family: Neurological diseases across the life span. In D. Turk & R. D. Kerns (Eds.), Health, illness, and families: A life-span perspective (pp. 146–182). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Kettle, M., & Chamberlain, M. A. (1989). The stroke patient in an urban environment. Clinical Rehabilitation 3, 131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lezak, M. D. (1987). Relationships between personality disorders, social disturbances, and physical disability following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2(1), 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Luria, A. R. (1959). The directive function of speech in development and dissolution, parts I and II. Word 15, 341–352, 453–464.Google Scholar
  31. Mayer, N. H., Keating, D. J., & Rapp, D. (1986). Skills, routines, and activity patterns of daily living: A functional nested approach. In B. P. Uzzell & Y. Gross (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology of intervention (pp. 205–222). Boston: Martinus NijhoffGoogle Scholar
  32. Morse, P. A., & Morse, A. R. (1988). Functional living skills: Promoting the interaction between neuropsychology and occupational therapy. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 3(1), 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nagele, D. A. (1985). Neuropsychological inferences from a tooth brushing task: A model for understanding deficits and making interventions. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 66, 558.Google Scholar
  34. Obrzut, J. E., & Hynd, G. W. (Eds.). (1986). Child neuropsychology (2 vols.). Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  35. Oddy, M., Coughlan, T., Tyerman, A., & Jenkins, D. (1985). Social adjustment after closed head injury: A further follow-up seven years after injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 48, 564–568.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Poon, L. W., Rubin, D. C., & Wilson, B. A. (Eds.). (1989). Everyday cognition in adulthood and late life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Price, R. H. (1979). The social ecology of treatment gain. In A. P. Goldstein & F. H. Kanfer (Eds.), Maximizing treatment gains: Transfer enhancement in psychotherapy (pp. 383–426). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  38. Prigatano, G. P., Fordyce, D. J., Zeiner, H. K., Roueche, J. R., Pepping, M., & Wood, B. C. (1984). Neuropsychological rehabilitation after closed head injury in young adults. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 47, 505–513.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rogoff, B., & Lave, J. (Eds.). (1984). Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Rourke, B. P. (1982). Central processing deficiencies in children: Toward a developmental neuropsychological model. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology 4, 1–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rourke, B. P., Bakker, D. J., Fisk, J. L., & Strang, J. D. (1983). Child neuropsychology: An introduction to theory, research, and clinical practice. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  42. Sacks, O. (1985). The man who mistook his wife for a hat. New York: Summit Books.Google Scholar
  43. Spreen, O., Tupper, D., Risser, A., Tuokko, H., & Edgell, D. (1984). Human developmental neuropsychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Sternberg, R. J., & Kolligian, J., Jr. (Eds.). (1990). Competence considered. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. K. (Eds.). (1986). Practical intelligence: Nature and origins of competence in the everyday world. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Stubbins, J., & Albee, G. W. (1984). Ideologies of clinical and ecological models. Rehabilitation Literature 45, 349–352.Google Scholar
  47. Trexler, L. E. (Ed.). (1982). Cognitive rehabilitation: Conceptualization and intervention. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  48. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Walsh, R. N., & Greenough, W. T. (Eds.). (1976). Environments as therapy for brain dysfunction. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  50. Wolfertsberger, W. (Eds.). (1972). The principle of normalization in human services. Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation.Google Scholar
  51. World Health Organization. (1980). International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • David E. Tupper
  • Keith D. Cicerone

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations