Advertisement

Non-Coherent Diversity Receivers for Mobile and Personal Satellite Communications

  • Dimitrios Makrakis
  • Dimitrios P. Bouras
  • Panayotis T. Mathiopoulos
Part of the The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science book series (SECS, volume 366)

Abstract

Improved non-coherent receivers for mobile and personal satellite communications are presented and evaluated. The channel is assumed as being corrupted by shadowing and multipath fading. The results demonstrate that the receivers are capable of reducing the error floors considerably and provide improvements higher than 12 dB. The technology is promising and a good candidate for use in the development of future wireless multimedia personal communication terminals.

Keywords

Channel State Information Error Floor Trellis Code Mobile Satellite Convolutional Encoder 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    IEEE Communications Magazine, Issue on Personal Communications Regulations, Vol. 29, Feb. 1991.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    D.J. Goodman, “Trends in cellular and cordless communications”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol.29, pp. 31–40, June 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    R. Olsen, D. Makrakis et. al., “The Canadian Olympus Propagation Experiment”, Proceedings of GLOBECOM’90, pp. 6.5.1–6.5.6.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Y. Akaiwa, et. al., “Highly Efficient Digital Mobile Communications with a Linear Modulation Method”, IEEE JSAC, Vol. SAC-5, No. 5, pp. 890–895, June 1987.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    T.G. Jedrey, N.E Lay and W. Raferty, “An All Digital 8-DPSK TCM Modem for Land Mobile Satellite Communications”, Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing, (ICASSP’88), pp. 1722–1725, May 1988.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    D. Makrakis, et. al., “Novel Receiver Structures for Systems Using Differential Detection”, IEEE Trans, on. Veh. Tech., Vol. VT-36, May 1987, pp. 71–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [6]a
    D. Makrakis, et. al., “Novel Receiver Structures for Systems Using Differential Detection”, in Proceedings of ICDSC-7, May 1986, pp. 681–688.Google Scholar
  8. [7]
    D. Makrakis, et. al., “A sequential decoder for the Differential Detection of Trellis Coded PSK Signals”, Proceedings of ICC’88, pp. 1433–1438.Google Scholar
  9. [8]
    D. Makrakis and P. Mathiopoulos, “Trellis Coded Non-Coherent QAM: A New Bandwidth and Power Efficient Scheme”, Proceedings of VTC’89, May 1989, pp. 95–100.Google Scholar
  10. [9]
    D. Makrakis and K. Feher, “Optimal Noncoherent Detection of PSK Signals”, Electronics Letters, March 15, 1990, pp. 398–401.Google Scholar
  11. [10]
    D. Makrakis, “Generalized Non-Coherent Detection”, Ph.D. Dissertation Thesis, Dept. of Elect. Eng. University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
  12. [11]
    “Improved Non-Coherent Receivers. Parts I & II”, CRC/NSERC/Communications Technical Reports No.1 & 2, May 1991.Google Scholar
  13. [12]
    D. Makrakis et. al., “Performance Analysis of Asymptotically Optimal Noncoherent Detection of Trellis Coded Multi-Amplitude/Phase Modulation in Gaussian Noise and ISI Channels”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. JSAC-13, No. 2, Feb. 1995.Google Scholar
  14. [13]
    D. Makrakis, “Trellis Coded Modulations with Improved Non-Coherent Detection for Personal and Mobile Satellite Communications”, International Journal of Satellite Communications (IJSC), Vol. 11, November 1993, pp. 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [14]
    D. Makrakis et. al., “Optimal Decoding in Fading Channels: A Combined Envelope, Multiple Differential and Coherent Detection Approach’”, IEEE Trans, on Comm., Vol. COM-42, Jan. 1994, pp. 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [15]
    C. Loo, “Measurements and models of a land mobile satellite channel and their applications to MSK signals”, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. VT- 36, pp. 114–121, Aug. 1987.Google Scholar
  17. [16]
    W. Zhuang, D. Makrakis, et al., “Modeling and Performance Analysis of EHF Land Mobile Satellite Channels - Signal Statistics”, Univ. of Ottawa Technical Report, 1992.Google Scholar
  18. [17]
    W. Zhuang, J-Y. Chouinar and D. Makrakis, “Transmission Over Mobile Satellite Channels at L and Ka Bands”, accepted in the Journal of Wireless Personal Communications.Google Scholar
  19. [18]
    D. Makrakis et. al., “Improved Non-Coherent Receivers with Diversity for Personal and Mobile Satellite Communications”, Technical Report, University of British Columbia, 1992.Google Scholar
  20. [19]
    M.A. Weissberger, “An Initial Summary of Models for Predicting the Attenuation of Radio Waves by Trees”, U.S. Dept. of Defense, Report no. ESD-TR-81–101.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dimitrios Makrakis
    • 1
  • Dimitrios P. Bouras
    • 2
  • Panayotis T. Mathiopoulos
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringLakehead UniversityThunder BayCanada
  2. 2.Department of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations