Database Architectures and Location Strategies for Mobility Management in Mobile Radio Systems

  • Nébil Tabbane
  • Sami Tabbane
Part of the The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science book series (SECS, volume 366)


With the increasing number of mobile service users, cellular systems must offer higher traffic capacities. Therefore, cells sizes are reduced which increases the mobility signalling load. Part of this signalling is due to handovers (“radio mobility”) and the other part to mobility management (“network mobility”). In this paper we combine location strategies and database architectures to evaluate their impact on user mobility management cost. Two location management strategies are studied: the classical strategy used in GSM, and the alternative strategy based on users’ mobility patterns. The centralized, distributed and hybrid types of databases architectures are considered here and combined with the two location strategies. Evaluation of different scenarios is done analytically. We show that, for the values used here, the hybrid database architecture combined with the alternative strategy allows to save more than 50% of the costs involved by the classical strategy combined with the centralized database architecture (which last combination is used in most of current cellular systems).


Mobility Management Location Strategy Classical Strategy Radio Interface Location Update 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    S. Tabbane, « An Alternative Strategy for Location Tracking, » IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 13, NO. 5, June 1995.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    E. Alonso, K. Meier Hellstern, G. Pollini, «Influence of Cell Geometry on Handover and Registration Rates in Cellular and Universal Personal Telecommunications Networks,» Rutges University, WINLAB-TR-31, May 1992.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    CCIR Report M/8 (mod. F), «Ruture Public Land Mobile Telecommunications System,» Doc. 8/1014-E, December 1989.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    R. Thomas, H. Gilbert, G. Mazziotto, «Influence of the Moving of the Mobile Stations on the Performance of a Radio Mobile Cellular Network,» Proc. Third Nordic Seminar on Digital Land Mobile Radio Communications, Copenhagen, Denmark, Sept. 12–15, 1998.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    X. Lagrange, P. Godlewski, S. Tabbane, «Les réseaux GSM/DCS,» Hermès, Novembre 1995.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    David C. C. Wang, «A Survey of Number Mobility Technuques for PCS,» in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comm., April 1994.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Jonh Zhonghe Wang, «The Hierachical Structure of Tracing Strategy for Universal Personal Communication Systems,» Applied Research, Motorola Inc., June 23 1992.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Jonh Z. Wang, «A Fully Distributed Location Registration Strategy for Universel Personal Communicatios Systems,» IEEE Journal on Selected Areas Communications, Vol. 11, No.6, Aug. 1993.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    T. Hattori, H. Sekiguchi, K. Kohiyama, and H. Yamamoto, «Personal Communication Concept and architecture, » in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comm., pp. 335.4.1 – 335.4.7, Apr. 16 – 19, 1990.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nébil Tabbane
    • 1
  • Sami Tabbane
    • 2
  1. 1.ISG TunisCité El GhazalaTunisia
  2. 2.ESPTTCité El GhazalaTunisia

Personalised recommendations