Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging after Coronary Ultrasound Ablation
The advantage of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) compared with coronary angiography relates to the ability to assess not only the vessel lumen but also the morphology of the vessel and plaque. Based on pathohistologic studies, the accuracy of intravascular imaging is very high and reliable before as well as after coronary interventions [1–7]. The following analysis of 20 patients after undergoing ultrasound ablation was performed to investigate the effect of therapeutic ultrasound ablation on coronary plaque with the aim of better understanding the mechanisms of this new therapeutic device.
KeywordsCatheter Cavitation Cardiol Athere Kreis
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 7.Koschyk DH, Chen C, Lorke D, Hamper K, Hamm CW. Is intravascular ultrasound valid for assessing results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty? — Comparison with patho-histology. Circulation 86:1456, 1992.Google Scholar
- 8.Waller BF, Pinkerton CA, Slack JD. Intravascular ultrasound: A histological study of vessels during life. Circulation 86:2305–2310, 1992.Google Scholar
- 11.Koschyk DH, Terres W, Weber P, Chen C, Hamm CW. Less vascular injury after coronary rotablation combined with low pressure angioplasty? Investigation with intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 21:444A, 1993.Google Scholar