Part family formation: coding and classification systems
Batch manufacturing produces a variety of different parts and accounts for 60–80% of all manufacturing activities (Chevalier, 1984). Moreover, at least 75% of all such parts are made in batches of less than 50 units (Groover, 1987). This large variety of parts and small batch sizes leads to part design and manufacturing inefficiencies such as inefficient use of design data, inaccuracies in planning and cost estimation, poor workflow, high tooling cost, high setup cost, large inventories and delivery problems. The remedy to these problems lay in sorting parts into families that have similar part design attributes and/or manufacturing attributes for a specific purpose. Design attributes include part shape (round or prismatic), size (length/diameter ratios), surface integrity (roughness, tolerance etc.), material type, raw material state (casting, bar stock etc.) etc. The part manufacturing attributes include operations (turning, milling etc.) and sequences, batch size, machine and cutting tools, processing times, production volumes etc.
KeywordsFlexible Manufacturing System Group Technology Part Type Cellular Manufacturing Hierarchical Cluster Algorithm
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Dunlap, G. C. and Hirlinger, C. R. (1983) Well planned coding and classification system offers company wide synergistic benefits. Industrial Engineering, November, 78–83.Google Scholar
- Eckert, R. L. (1975) Codes and classification systems. American Machinist, December, 88–92.Google Scholar
- Gallagher, C. C. and Knight, W. A. (1986) Group Technology Production Methods in Manufacture, Ellis Horwood, Chichester.Google Scholar
- Gongaware, T. A. and Ham, I. (1981) Cluster analysis applications for group technology manufacturing systems, in Proceedings of the IX North American Metal-working Research Conference. Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, MI, pp. 131–6.Google Scholar
- Groover, M. P. (1987) Automation, Production Systems and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, Boston.Google Scholar
- Hyer, N. L. and Wemmerlov, U. (1984) Group technology and productivity, Harvard Business Review, 62(4), 140–9.Google Scholar
- Hyer, N. L. and Wemmerlov, U. (1985), Group technology oriented coding systems: structures, applications and implementation, Production and Inventory Management, 26, 55–78.Google Scholar
- Jackson, D. (1978) Cell System of Production, Business Books, London.Google Scholar
- Kasilingam, R. G. and Lashkari, R. S. (1990) Allocating parts to existing part families in cellular manufacturing systems. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 3, 3–12.Google Scholar
- Kusiak, A. (1983) Part families selection model for flexible manufacturing systems, in Proceedings of the Annual Industrial Engineering Conference, Louisville KY, pp. 575–80.Google Scholar
- Marion, D., Rubinovich, J. and Ham, I. (1986) Developing a group technology coding and classification scheme. Industrial Engineering, July, 90–7.Google Scholar