Growth Kinetics Problems and the Renormalization Group
We discuss the structure of the renormalization group and the determination of universality classes for growth kinetics problems. Our analysis is based on a differential renormalization group equation of the Callen-Symanzik type. We find that many growth kinetics problems can be classified into four basic groups characterized by different low temperature behavior.
KeywordsRenormalization Group Universality Class Renormalization Group Equation Renormalization Group Approach Real Space Renormalization Group
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.See the review in: J.D. Gunton, M. San Miguel and P.S. Sahni, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, Vol. 8, p. 267 (1983), ed. by C. Domb and J. Lebowitz (New York, Academic Press).Google Scholar
- 2.For example, in very recent work on Cell Dynamical Models by Y. Oono and S. Puri (preprint) it is stated that they believe their “models are in the same universality class as the Cahn-Hilliard equation”.Google Scholar
- 5.K. Oki, H. Sagana, and T. Eguchi, J. Phys. (Paris) C7, 414 (1977).Google Scholar
- 7.Z.W. Lai, G.F. Mazenko and O.T. Vails, Preprint.Google Scholar
- 8.In this paper we are primarily concerned with low temperatures where, for class 1 and 2 systems, £ - ξ - T. For class 3 and 4 systems the identification of C, is determined by the collective activated nature of the droplets pinned by the impurities and not governed by the width of interfaces (~ (T)) as in class 1 and 2 systems.Google Scholar
- 10.D.J. Amit, Field Theory, the Renormalization Group and Critical Phenomena (McGraw-Hill, New York, (1978) Chapter 8.Google Scholar
- 11.It is suggested in Ref. 12 that we did not recover the Lifshitz-Slyosov result for the SEKI model in Ref. 3 because we only allowed for a T=0 fixed point in our analysis. This suggestion is incorrect since the T=0 fixed point associated with this problem corresponds to a high temperature disordered fixed point on scales large compared to the freezing length L0.Google Scholar
- 14.J. Amar, F. Sullivan and R. Mountain, to be published.Google Scholar
- 17.G. Grest and D. Srolovitz, Phys. Rev. B 32, 3014 (1985). See also D. Chowdhury, M. Grant and J.D. Gunton, Phys. Rev. B 35, 6792 (1987).Google Scholar
- 19.There is numerical evidence in Ref. 17.Google Scholar