The Modelling of Fluid Flow Phenomena in Foundry Operations

  • Julian Szekely


An overview is given of fluid flow phenomena in foundry operations. It is shown that fluid flow phenomena play a key role in affecting the kinetics of many physicochemical processes in foundry systems associated with the production, refining and casting of foundry iron.

A general methodology is described for formulating problems of this type, with emphasis on the numerous problems that may now be quite accurately addressed with the aid of mathematical modeling.

The examples cited include the behavior of gas bubble stirred ladles, thermal stratification of melts held in ladles, induction furnaces and a simplified case of mold filling. In all these cases the theoretical predictions were found to be in good agreement with experimental measurements.


Turbulent Kinetic Energy Induction Furnace Molten Steel Eddy Diffusion Mold Filling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    R. B. Bird, W. E. Stewart and E. N. Lightfoot, Transport Phenomena, John Wiley, New York (I960).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Szekely and N. J. Themelis, Rate Phenomena in Process Metallurgy, John Wiley, New York (1971).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. F. Hughes and F. J. Young, The Electromagnetodynamics of Fluids, John Wiley, New York (1966).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Szekely and C. W. Chang, Ironmaking and Steelmaking 4, 190, 196 (1977).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. E. Launder and D. B. Spalding, Lectures on the Mathematical Modelling of Turbulence, Academic Press, London (1972).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Szekely, Fluid Flow Phenomena in Metals Processing, Academic Press, New York (1979).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Nakanishi, T. Fujii and J. Szekely, Ironmaking and Steelmaking 3, 193 (1975).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Sano and K. Mori,Proc. SCANINJECT III, Lulea, Sweden (1983).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Murthy and J. Szekely, Met Trans. 17B, 487 (1986).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    O. J. Ilegbusi and J. Szekely, “The Stratification of Ladles,” to be submitted to Trans. ISIJ. Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. W. Klinka, in Mathematical Process Models in Iron and Steelmaking, The Metals Society (1973).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. W. Hlinka and T. W. Miller, Iron and Steel Engineer (Aug. 1970), p. 123.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Szekely and J. H. Chen, Met. Trans. 2 (1), 189 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    N. El-Kaddah and J. Szekely, Proc. SCANINJECT III, Lulea Sweden (1983).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    N. El-Kaddah and J. Szekely, Proc. 3rd Process Technology Conference, Pittsburgh, The Iron and Steel Society (1982).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. H. Castillejos and J. K. Brimacombe, Proc. SCANINJECT IV, Lulea, Sweden (1986).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. H. Grevet, J. Szekely and N. El-Kaddah, Int. J. Heat and Mass Transfer, 25, 487 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. S. Woo and J. Szekely, forthcoming publication.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. P. Schwartz and P. T. L. Koh, Proc. SCANINJECT IV, Lulea, Sweden (1986).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    N. El-Kaddah and J. Szekely, J. Fluid Mech. 147, 53 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    J-L. Meyer, N. El-Kaddah, J. Szekely, C. Vives and R. Ricou, Met. Trans. 18B (1987), in press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    N. El-Kaddah, J. Szekely and G. Carlsson, Met. Trans. 15B, 633 (1984).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. Stoehr, Journal of Metals (1984).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. Szekely and F. Foreman, Journal of Metals (October 1986).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julian Szekely
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations