Abstract

The overall goal for the design of Intelligent Decision Support Systems (IDSS) is to enhance understanding of the process under all operating conditions. For an IDSS to be effective, it must: (1) select or generate the right information, (2) produce reliable and consistent information, (3) allow flexible and effective operator interaction, (4) relate information presentation to current plant status and problems, and (5) make the presentation at the right time. Several ongoing R&D programs try to design and build IDSSs. A particular example is the ESPRIT project Graphics and Knowledge Based Dialogue for Dynamic Systems (GRADIENT) which addresses the problems of: (1) knowledge-based alarm handling with real-time state and fault identification, (2) prevention of incidents through monitoring of operator actions, and (3) increased flexibility of the graphics interface through abandoning the restrictions of pre-defined displays. The GRADIENT project regards the interaction between man and machine as a whole and integrates several specialised support functions through the common concept of a knowledge-based, graphical dialogue. The starting point is the analysis of the functionality needed for this purpose. The knowledge-based systems provides the content of the interaction, graphical expert systems provides the form, and the whole is controlled by a dialogue system. There are two categories of users for the GRADIENT system: the designer of a particular application, and the operator who uses it to control the process. In both cases the GRADIENT project considers the functions that are needed to support these user categories.

Keywords

Coherence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alty, J. L., Elzer, P., Hoist, O., Johannsen, G. & Savory, S. (1985). Literature and user survey of issues related to man-machine interfaces for supervision and control systems. Copenhagen, Denmark: Computer Resources International.Google Scholar
  2. Alty, J. L., Mullin, J. & Weir, G. (1986). Survey of dialogue systems and literature on dialogue design (P857-WP3.1/.2-UST-001). Glasgow, UK: University of Strathclyde.Google Scholar
  3. Belleli, T., Christensen, B., Hollnagel, E., Hovgaard, H.-O. & Jepsen, M. (1986). Design and architecture of QRES1 (P857-WP5-CRI-033). Copenhagen, Denmark: Computer Resources International.Google Scholar
  4. Borchers, H. W., Elzer, P., Siebert, H., Weisang, C, Borys, B.-B., Fejes, L. & Johannsen, G. (1986). Survey of existing sets of picture elements and editors. (P857-WP3-BBC-012). Heidelberg, F. R. Germany: Brown, Boveri & Cie AG.Google Scholar
  5. Borys, B.-B., Hansel, H.-G., Johannsen, G. & Schmidt, J. (1986). Task and knowledge analysis. Methodology and application in power plants (P857-WP2.1-UKS-007). Kassel, F. R. Germany: Gesamthochschule Kassel.Google Scholar
  6. Hollnagel, E. (1987). Plan recognition in modelling of users. Invited paper for the International Post-SMiRT Seminar on Accident Sequence Modelling, Miinchen, F. R. Germany, August 24–25.Google Scholar
  7. Hollnagel, E. (1988). Information and reasoning in intelligent decision support systems. In G. Mancini, D. D. Woods & E. Hollnagel (Eds.), Cognitive engineering in dynamic environments. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Kretzschmar, J. G. (1986). Expert systems in the nuclear sector. (In Second International Expert Systems Conference, London, 30 September - 2 October 1986.) Oxford, England: Learned Information.Google Scholar
  9. Neilson, I. (1987a). Techniques for specifying dialogue (P857-WP3-UST-017). Glasgow, UK: University of Strathclyde.Google Scholar
  10. Neilson, I. (1987b). Dialogue specification: A select bibliography (P857-WP3-UST-018). Glasgow, UK: University of Strathclyde.Google Scholar
  11. Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Rasmussen, J. (1986). Information processing and human-machine interaction. New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  13. Reason, J. (1988). Cognitive aids in process environments: Prostheses or tools? In G. Mancini, D. D. Woods & E. Hollnagel (Eds.), Cognitive engineering in dynamic environments. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Stassen, H. (1986). Decision demands and task requirements in work environments: What can be learnt from human operator modelling. In E. Hollnagel, G. Mancini & D. D. Woods (Eds.), Intelligent decision support in process environments. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  15. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 1851124–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Uhrig, R. E. (1986). Toward the next generation of nuclear power plantsForum for Applied Research and Public Policy(Fall), 20–31.Google Scholar
  17. Woods, D. D. (1984). Visual momentum: A concept to improve the cognitive coupling of person and computer. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 21 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik Hollnagel
    • 1
  1. 1.Advanced Information Processing DivisionComputer Resources InternationalCopenhagen VDenmark

Personalised recommendations