Advertisement

Abstract

Advanced technologies have had a profound impact on our life and work place. Advanced technologies include computers and related software development, human factors engineering, systems analysis and analytical techniques, and improved quantitative management processes. New techniques, made possible by modern computer hardware and software applications, are becoming indispensable for providing improved methods to assure safe, reliable, and less costly means of accomplishing many tasks. Advanced technologies are ideally suited for improving the performance of new and existing nuclear powerplants.

Keywords

Nuclear Power Plant Life Cycle Cost Nuclear Regulatory Commission Advanced Technology Program Management Decision Support 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    NUREG-0737, “Clarification of TMI Action Plan Requirements,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, November 1980.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    NUREG-0737, Supplement 1, “Requirements for Emergency Response Capability,” Generic Letter No. 82–33, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, December 1982.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    DOE/NE-0064, “Artificial Intelligence and Nuclear Power,” June 1985.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    DOE/NE-0065, “Robotics and Nuclear Power,” June 1985.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    DOE/NE-0066, “Sensors and Nuclear Power,” June 1985.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    DOE/NE-0067, “Modularization and Nuclear Power,” June 1985.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. A. Azara and E.V. Lofgren, “Effectiveness of Reliability Technology Applicable to LWE Operational Safety,” NUREG/CR-4618, April 30, 1986.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Touchton, D. Genter, “Emergency Action Level Classification System,” paper presented at EPRI workshop on “Artificial Intelligence Applications to Nuclear Power,” Palo Alto, California, June 19 to 21, 1985.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    MPR Associates, Power Plant Alarm Systems: A Survey and Recommended Approach for Evaluating Improvements, EPRI NP-4361, December 1985.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D.G. Cain, “BWR Shutdown Analyzer Using Certified Intelligence Techniques,” EPRI NP-4139 Special Report, July 1985.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. P. D’Zmura and S. E. Seeman, “The U.S. DOE Man-Machine Integration Program for Liquid Metal Reactors” in Proceedings of an International Topical Meeting on Computer Applications for Nuclear Power Plant Operation and Control, Pasco, WA, September 1985.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Rooney, “Expert Pump Diagnostic Systems,” EPRI workshop on “Artificial Intelligence Applications to Nuclear Power.”Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Christopherson, “Maintenance Advisor,” EPRI workshop on “Artificial Intelligence Applications to Nuclear Power”.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M.W. Frank and A. Epstein, “Application of AI to Improve Plant Availability,” Society of Computer Simulation, Simulation Series 17, pg. 92, January 1986.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    OECD-NEA, Halden Reactor Project Programme, Institutt for Energiteknikk, Norway, November 1986.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Howard H. Rohm
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Department of EnergyOffice of Nuclear EnergyUSA

Personalised recommendations