Abstract
Many works in the field of image processing stress the utility of using Artificial Intelligence tools to obtain enhanced performances in the scene understanding task. Feigenbaum (1977) states that “..the power of an expert system derives from the knowledge it possesses not from the particular formalism and inference schemas it employs…”. In our opinion this assertion can be extended to all complex cognitive problems (such as natural language and automatic image understanding) in which human reasoning capabilities are required. “From this point of view a theory for the vision problem resolution must necessarily contain elements of a more general theory of thinking (Minsky, 1974)”. In order to translate these philosophical statements into action, we have to understand what kind of knowledge is useful for the vision problem resolution and how to represent it. Looking at the image understanding problem as a perception problem it is possible to individuate two different knowledge sources. The first one descends from the perceptual grouping laws of visible entities; the other derives directly from an explicit description of the objects to be recognized in the image describing a real scene. Normally these two knowledges are used in a hierarchical fashion with a special emphasis on one source at the expenses of the other. Moreover in many of these applications a low level processing attached to the image extracts features and a high level step tries to match the previously selected features with the model descriptions. A drawback of this approach is that an intelligent matching can be applied to an essentially non intelligent image partition.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brooks R.A.,“Model-based three-dimensional interpretations of two-dimensional images”, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. PAMI-5, No.2, March 1983, pp. 140–150.
Feigenbaum E. A., “The art of Artificial Intelligence: themes and case studies of knowledge engineering”, in IJCAI 5, pp. 1014 –1029, 1977.
Hanson A. R. and Riseman E. M., “VISIONS: a computer system for interpreting scenes”, New York: Academic, 1978, pp. 303–333.
Levine M. D. and Nazif A. M., “Rule-based image segmentation: a dynamic control strategy approach”, Computer Vision Graphics Image Process. 6, 1985, pp. 104–126.
Matsuyama T. and Nagao M., “A structural analysis of complex aerial photographs”, New York: Plenum, 1980.
Minsky M., “A framework for representing knowledge”, M.I.T. A.I. Memo No. 306, June 1974.
McKeown D.M. jr., Harvey W. A. jr. and McDermott J., “Rule-based interpretation of aerial imagery”, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. PAMI-7, No. 5, Sept. 1985, pp. 570–585.
Nazif A. M. and Levine M. D., “Low level image segmentation: an expert system”, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal„ Mach. Intell.,vol. PAMI-6, No. 5, Sept. 1984, pp. 555–577.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Losito, S., Pasquariello, G., Sylos-Labini, G., Tavoletti, A. (1988). A Knowledge Based Approach for Image Understanding. In: Cantoni, V., Di Gesù, V., Levialdi, S. (eds) Image Analysis and Processing II. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1007-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1007-5_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8289-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-1007-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive