Abstract
The FUR (FUnctional Reasoning) project aims to develop a computational model for the representation and use of functional knowledge. Reasoning in terms of function seems to be very common: in everyday language, for instance, objects are often referred to in terms of the function they provide (e.g. a “washing mashine”). In many cases a relation exists between function and shape, i.e. function can be inferred from structure and vice versa. Tools like hammers, screwdrivers or spanners are well- known examples.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
J. Connell, Learning Shape Descriptions: Generating and Generalizing Models of Visual Objects, MIT Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 1985. M.S. Thesis.
R. Brooks, Symbolic Reasoning among 3-D Models and 2-D Images, Artificial Intelligence XVII, (1981),.
R. Nevatia and T. Binford, Description and Recognition of Curved Objects, Artificial Intelligence VIII 1 (1977),.
L. Shapiro, J. Moriarty, R. Haralick and P. Mulgaonkar, Matching Three-Dimensional Objects Using a Relational Paradigm, Pattern Recognition XVII, 4 (1984),.
P. Besl and R. Jain, Three-Dimensional Object Recognition, Computing Surveys XVII, 1 (1985).
F. Ingrand and J.-C. Latombe, Functional Reasoning for Automatic Fixture Design, Proc. 13th Annual Meeting,5Man or Machine: A Choice of Intelligence, (1984),.
P. Winston, T. Binford, B. Katz and M. Lowry, Learning Phyical Descriptions from Functional Definitions, Examples, and Precedents, Robotics Research Cambridge, 1984, 117–135.
M. Brady, P. Agre, D. Braunegg and J. Connell, The Mechanic’s Mate, ECAI 84: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Amsterdam, 1984.
M. DiManzo, G. Adorni, F. Ricci and F. Giunchiglia, Building Functinal Descriptions, Proceeding 5th ROVISEC, Amsterdam, October 1985.
M. DiManzo, G. Adorni, F. Ricci, A. Batistoni and C. Ferrari, Qualitative Theories for Functional Description of Objects, Esprit Report P419—TK4 — WP2-DI1,, May 1986.
M. DiManzo, F. Ricci, A. Batistoni and C. Ferrari, A Framework for Object Functional Descriptions, Proc. 2nd Intern. Conf. on Artif. IntelL, Marseille, December 1986.
R. Schank, Conceptual Information Processing, North—Holland, Amsterdam, 1975.
C. Jackins and S. L. Tanimoto, Oct-trees and their Use in Representing 3-D Objects, Computer Graphics and Image Processing XIV, (1980), 249–270.
D. Meagher, Geometrical Modeling using Octree Encoding, Computer Graphics and Image Processing XIX, (1982), 129–147.
H. Chen and T. Huang, Octrees: Construction, Representation, and Manipulation, Proc. SPIE Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Computer Vision SPIE 579, (1985),.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
DiManzo, M., Trucco, E., Giunchiglia, F., Ricci, F. (1988). The Fur Project: Understanding Functional Reasoning. In: Cantoni, V., Di Gesù, V., Levialdi, S. (eds) Image Analysis and Processing II. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1007-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1007-5_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8289-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-1007-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive