Nondestructive Residual Stress Measurements in Railroad Wheels Using the Low-Field Magnetoacoustic Test Method
Residual tensile stresses in the rims of railroad wheels created by repeated applications of brakes have been known to contribute to catastrophic wheel failures. About 235,000 potentially dangerous railroad wheels are being removed anually in the US to prevent the wheel-related accidents . The current industrial standard determining the removal of a particular wheel from service is the federal regulation of a visual inspection method. In this method one determines the width of a discolored band in the rim of a wheel radially, and if the width exceeds 10 cm (4 in.) the wheel is considered potentially dangerous. Destructive test methods, e.g., hole-drilling and saw-cutting techniques, however, have shown that the visual inspection method is unreliable. Some wheels considered dangerous had no appreciable residual tensile stresses, while some considered safe (not discolored) had dangerous level of residual tensile stresses in the rim when saw-cut or hole-drilled. To improve the level of safety in railroad transportation and reduce waste, reliable NDE methods have been in great demand.
KeywordsResidual Stress Domain Wall Residual Tensile Stress Domain Wall Motion Acoustic Wave Propagation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.G. E. Stevens; Private communication.Google Scholar
- 3.H. Fukuoka, H. Toda, K. Hirakawa, H. Sakamoto and Y. Toya, “Acoustoelastic Measurements of Residual Stress Measurements of residual stresses in the Rim of Railroad Wheels”, in Wave Propagation in Homogeneous Media and Ultrasonic Nondestructive Evaluation, Edited by G. C. Johnson, AMD-Vol. 6 (Published by ASME, 1984).Google Scholar
- 4.K. Tiitto, “Solving Internal Stress Measurement Problems”, in Nondestruvctive Methods for Material Property Determination, Edited by C. O. Ruud and R. E. Green, Jr. (Plenum Press, New York, 1984).Google Scholar
- 5.Y. Shapira, “Acoustic Wave Propagation in High Magnetic Fields”, Physical Acoustics Vol. V, Edited by W. P. Mason (Academic Press, New York, 1968).Google Scholar
- 7.B. D. Cullity, Introduction to Magnetic Materials (Addison-Weslely, Menlo Park, 1972).Google Scholar
- 8.D. M. Bozorth, Ferromagnetism (Van Nostrand, New York, 1951).Google Scholar
- 10.H. Trauble, “Crystal Defects in Ferromagnetc Single Crystals”, in Magnetism and Metallurgy Vol. 2, Editted by A. E. Berkowitz and E. Kneller (Academic Press, New York, 1969).Google Scholar
- 11.M. Namkung, D. Utrata, S. G. Allison and J. S. Heyman, Proc. IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium 2, 1022 (1985).Google Scholar
- 12.M. Namkung and J. S. Heyman, Proc. IEEE Ultrasonis Symposium 2, 950 (1984).Google Scholar
- 13.S. G. Allison, J. S. Heyman, K. Smith and K. Salama, Proc. IEEE Ultrasonics symposium 2, 997 (1984) and references cited there.Google Scholar
- 15.G. W. Rathenau and G. E. de Vries, “Diffusion”, in Magnetism and Meatallurgy Vol. 2, Editted by A. E. Berkowitz and E. Kneller (Academic Press, New York, 1969).Google Scholar