Advertisement

Two Stage Theory of Carcinogenesis: A Critical Review Introducing the Concept of Modulation

  • Marcel Roberfroid
Conference paper

Abstract

Carcinogenesis is a long lasting process which, progressively, transforms part of a differentiated tissue to a malignant tumor. Initiation is the first event which introduces the tissue or some of its cells into that process. That event may be a physical (radiation) or a chemical mostly mutagenic treatment but also a viral infection or even a transfection of a piece of viral DNA (Lacey et al.1986). In most experimental protocols reported so far for viral and physical induction of cancer, only the initiation step seems to be required so that after a single or a few infections by the virus or a single or a few doses of irradiation is (are) sufficient to induce the appearance of malignant tumors in a majority of the animals. Eventhough such single step protocols do exist for the chemical induction of cancer using large doses of carcinogen, most of the protocols which are classically used for that purpose are multisteps in that sense that they involve a sequence of different treatments.

Keywords

Mouse Skin Preneoplastic Lesion Carcinogenic Process Chemical Carcinogenesis Skin Carcinogenesis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bannasch,P.,(1984) Sequential cellular changes during chemical carcinogenesis. J.Cancer Res. Clin.Oncol. 108,11–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    BOUTWELL, R.K.,(1964) Some biological aspects of skin Carcinogenesis. Prog.Exp.Tulmor Res.4, 207–250.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    de GERLACHE J., LANS M.,PREAT V.,TAPER H. and ROBERFROID M. (1984) Comparison of different models of rat liver carcinogenesis: conclusions from a systemic analysis. Toxicol.Pathol.12, 374–382.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    de GERLACHE J.,TAPER, H.,LANS.M., PREAT,V., and ROBERFROID M.,(1987), Dietary modulation of rat liver carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis, 8,B37–340.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    FARBER E., (1973) Carcinogenesis- cellular evolution as a unifying theory. Cancer Res., 33, 2537–2550.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    FARBER E., and D.S.R. SARMA,(1987), From the normal cell to cancer: The multistep process: the liver model in: A.Maskens ed. Concepts and theories in carcinogenesis. Excepta Medica Congress Series, Elsevier Scientific Publ. Amsterdam, in press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    FARBER,E. (1982), Sequential events in chemical carcinogenesis in: F.F.Becker (ed.)Cancer, A Comprehensive Treatise, 2nd edition. Plenum Public.Corp. N.Y., pp 485–506.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    FURSTENBERGER G., BERRY D.L. SORG B., and F. MARKS (1981) Skin tumor promotion by phorbol esters is a two stage process. Proc.Natl.Acade.Sci., USA 78, 7722–7726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    HENNINNGS,H. SHORES,R., wENCK, M.L., SPRANGLER,E.F., TARONE R and S.H. YUSPA (1983), Malignant conversion of mouse skin tumours is increased by tumour initiators and unaffected by tumour promoters. Nature, 304, 67–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    IVERSEN, O.H., and U.IVERSEN (1982) Must initiatiors come first? Tumorigenic and carcinogenic effects on skin of 3 methylcholanthrene and TPA in various sequences. Brit.J.Cancer, 45, 912–920PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    IVERSEN,O.H. and E.G.ASTRUP (1984), The paradigm of two-stage carcinogenesis: a critical attitude. Cancer Investig., 2,51–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    LACEY,M., ALPERT,S. and D.HANAHAN (1986) Bovine papilloma virus genome induce skin tumours in transgenic mice Nature 322, 609–612.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    LANS,M., de GERLACHE,J., TAPER H., PREAT V; AND ROBERFROID M. (1983),Phenobarbital as a promoter in the initiation/selection process of experimental rat hepatocarcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis, 4, 141–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    MOTTRAM,J.C.(1944) A developing factor in experimental blastogenesis J.Pathol.Bacteriol., 56, 181–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    PERRAINO,C., FRY R. J. M.,STAFFELD E. and W.E.KISIELESKI (1973) Effect of varying the exposure to phenobarbital on its enhancement of 2-acetylaminofluorene induced hepatic tumorigenesis in the rat. Cancer Res., 31, 1506–1512Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    PITOT,H.C., BARSNESS,L. GOLDSWORTHY,T. and K;KITAGAWA (1978). Biochemical characterisation of stages of hepatic carcinogenesis after a single dose of diethylnitrosamine. Nature, 271, 456–458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    PITOT,H.C.,(1983), Contribution to our understading of the natural history of neoplastic development in lower animals to the cause and control of human cancer. Cancer Surveys, 2, 519–538Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    PREAT V., PECTOR J.C., TAPER H., LANS M., DE GERLACHE J. and ROBERFROID M. (1984) Promoting effect of portocaval anastomosis in rat hepatocarcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis, 5, 1151–1154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    PREAT V.,LANS M., DE GERLACHE J., TAPER H., AND ROBERFROID M.(1986) Comparison of the biological effects of phenobarbital and nafenopin in rat hepatocarcinogenesis Japan.J. Cancer Res.,(GANN), 77, 629–638Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    RAO M.S.,LALWANI N.D.,SCARPELLI D.G. AND REDDY J.K.(1986) The absence of g-glutamyl transpeptidase activity in putative preneoplastic lesions and in hepatocellular carcinomas induced in rats by the hipolipidemic peroxisome proliferator Wy-14, 643. Carcinogenesis.3, 1231–1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    ROBERFROID M.B.(1987), From normal cell to cancer: an overview introducing the concept of modulation of carcinogenesis, in: A. Maskens (ed.) Concepts and Theories in Carcinogenesis, Excepta Medica Congress Series, Elsevier-Scientific Publishers. 157–167.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    ROUS,P. and J.G.KIDD (1941) Conditional neoplasms and subthreshold neoplastic states. A study of tar tumors in rabbits J.Exp.Med. 73,365–376.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    SCHERER,E. and P. EMMELOT (1975), Kinetics of induction and growth of precancerous liver cell foci and liver tumor formation by dimethylnitrosamine in the rat. Europ.J.Cancer, 11, 145–154Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    SHIVAPURKAR,N.HOOVER, K.L. and L.A. POIRIER (1986), Effect of methionine and choline on liver tumor promotion by phenobarbital and DDT in diethylnitrosamine -initiated rats. Carcinogenesis, 7, 547–550PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    SHUBIK,P (1977),The implication of multiple tumor induction in rodent skin for the biologic nature of neoplasia Cancer, 40,1821–1824PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    SLAGA J.T.,FISHER,J.M., NELSON,K. and G.L.GLEASON (1980),Studies on the mechanism of skin tumor promotion: evidence for several stages in promotion Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA, 77,3659–3663PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    SOLT,D.B. and E.FARBER (1970) New principle for the analysis of chemical carcinogenesis. Nature 263, 702–703Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    TEEBOR G.w. AND F.F.BECKER (1972),Regression and persistence of hyperplastic nodules induced by N-2 fluorenylacetamide and their relationship to hepatocarcinogenesis. Cancver Res., 31,1–3Google Scholar
  29. 28.
    TERRACINI,B., SCHUBIK,P AND G. DELLA PORTA (1960). A study of skin carcinogenesis in the mouse with single application of 9,10-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene at different dosages. Cancer Res., 20,1538–1542PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcel Roberfroid
    • 1
  1. 1.Unite de Biochimie Toxicologique et CancerologiqueUniversite Catholique de Louvain U.C.L.BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations