Pressure Induced Valence Transition in Cerium Studied by Positron Annihilation Spectroscopy

  • A. Bharathi
  • K. P. Gopinathan
  • C. S. Sundar
  • B. Viswanathan


The low pressure fcc γ-phase of Ce at ambient temperature is known to possess the properties of a trivalent rare earth metal. On the application of pressure at ~ 8 kbar, it undergoes a first order isostructural transition to the a-phase, accompanied by a decrease in lattice parameter from 5.16 to 4.85 Å. At ~ 55 kbar, Ce transforms to another close packed structure (α’ phase) with a lattice parameter of 4.66 Å. Our earlier understanding of the mechanism of the pressure induced γ → α transition was on the basis of the 4f-promotional model [1]. This assumes that the 4f-level in the γ-phase is well localised and occupied by one electron per atom and that this electron is completely or partially (0.7 electron) transferred to the conduction band in the α-phase. Recent spectroscopic measurements such as photo-emission [2], x-ray absorption [3] and Compton scattering [4] provided evidence against the validity of the 4f-promotional model and raised a controversy on the question of valence in the collapsed phase. The detailed mechanism of the valence transitions and the nature of 4f-delocalisation in the high pressure phases are still not fully understood.


Angular Correlation Compton Scattering Positron Lifetime Annihilation Rate Positron Annihilation Spectroscopy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    D.C. Koskenmaki and K.A. Gschneidner, in “Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare Earths”, K.A. Gschneidner and L. Eyring eds. (North-Holland, Amsterdam,1978) Vol.1, p.337Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    R.D. Parks, M. Martensson and B. Reihl, in “Valence Instabilities”, P. Wachter and H. Boppart, eds (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982) p. 239.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    A. Platan and S.E. Karlsson, Phys. Rev. B18, 3820 (1978)Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    U. Kornstadt, R. Lasser and B. Lengeler, Phys. Rev. B21, 1898 (1980)Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    K.P. Gopinathan, C.S. Sundar and B. Viswanathan, Solid State Comm. 32, 369 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    D.R. Gustafson, J.D. McNutt and L.O. Roellig, Phys. Rev. 183, 435 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    R.F. Gempel, D.R. Gustafson and J.D. Willenberg, Phys. Rev. B5, 2082 (1972)Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    J.D. McGervey, S.G. Usmar, N. Panigrahi, O.D. McMasters, K.A. Gschneidner and C.Y. Huang, in “Positron Annihilation”, P.G. Coleman, S.C. Sharma and L.M. Diana, eds. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982) p.240Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    P. Kirkegaard, M. Eldrup, O.E. Mogensen and N.J. Pedersen, Comput. Phys. Commun. 23, 307 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    W. Brandt, Appl. Phys. 5, 6 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    M.J. Puska and R.M. Nieminen, J. Phys. F13, 333 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    F. Herman and S. Skilmann, “Atomic Structure Calculations” (Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963)Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    S. Berko and J.S. Plaskett, Phys. Rev. 112, 1877 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Bharathi
    • 1
  • K. P. Gopinathan
    • 1
  • C. S. Sundar
    • 1
  • B. Viswanathan
    • 1
  1. 1.Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic ResearchKalpakkamIndia

Personalised recommendations