The Controversial Therapies Proposed for Treatment of the Child with Learning Disabilities and/or Attention Deficit Disorder

  • Larry B. Silver
Part of the Critical Issues in Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics book series (CIDB)

Abstract

It is estimated that between 3 and 7% of the children and adolescents in this country, up to four million, are learning disabled (LD). Of this group, about 20% will have other evidence of central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction, primarily hyperactivity and/or distractability-attention deficit disorder (ADD) (Silver, 1981).

Keywords

Sugar Schizophrenia Beach Neurol Fructose 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrams, A.L., 1968, Delayed and irregular maturation versus minimal brain injury. Recommendations for a change in current nomenclature, Clin. Pediatr. 7:344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Academy of Cerebral Palsy, 1965, Statement of the Executive Committee, February 15.Google Scholar
  3. American Academy of Ophthalmology, 1984, policy statement on Learning Disabilities, Dyslexia and Vision.Google Scholar
  4. American Academy of Pediatrics, 1982, The Doman-Delacato treatment of neurologically handicapped children. A policy statement by the American Academy of Pediatrics, Pediatrics 70:810.Google Scholar
  5. American Academy of Pediatrics, 1972, Joint Organizational Statement, The eye and learning disabilities, Pediatrics 49:454.Google Scholar
  6. American Academy of Pediatrics, 1965, Statement of the Executive Board, American Academy of Pediatrics Newsletter 16:1.Google Scholar
  7. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Nutrition, 1976, Megavitamin therapy for childhood psychoses and learning disabilities, Pediatrics 58:910.Google Scholar
  8. American Psychiatric Association, 1980, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, ed. 3, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  9. American Psychiatric Association, Task1 Force on Vitamin Therapy in Psychiatry, 1973, Megavitamin and Orthomolecular Therapy inPsychiatry, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  10. American Council on Science and Health, 1979, Diet and Hyperactivity: Is There a Relationship? prepared by M.J. Sheridan for the American Council on Science and Health, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Ayres, A.J., 1978, Learning disabilities and the vestibular system, J. Learning Disabil. 11:18.Google Scholar
  12. Ayres, A. J., 1975, Southern California Postrotary Nystagmus Test, Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  13. Brutten, M., Richardson, S. O., and Mangel, C., 1972, Something Wrong With My Child: A Parent’s Book About Children With Learning Disabilities, Harcourt-Brace-Jovanovich, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Carlson, P.V., and Greenspoon, N.K., 1968, The uses and abuses of visual training for children with perceptual-motor learning problems, Am. J. Optomet. 45:161.Google Scholar
  15. Carpenter, M. B., 1974, Core Text of Neuroanatomy, p. 101, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  16. Clements, S., 1966, Minimal Brain Dysfunction in Children. National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Blindness, Monograph No. 3, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  17. Conners, C. K., 1980, Food Additives and Hyperactive Children, pp. 28–40, New York, Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  18. Conners, C.K., Goyette, C.H., Southwick, D.A., et al. , 1976, Food additives and hyperkinesis. A controlled double-bond experiment, Pediatrics 58:154.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Canadian Mental Health Association, Board of Directors, 1973, quoted in Ban, T. A., The niacin controversy: The possibility of negative effects, Psychiatric Opinion 10:19.Google Scholar
  20. Conners, C.K., and Blouin, A.G., 1982/1983, Nutritional effects on behavior of children, J. Psychiatr. Res. 17:193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cott, A., 1977, The Orthomolecular Approach to Learning Disabilities, Huxley Institute, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Cott, A., 1971, Orthomolecular approach to the treatment of learning disabilities, Schizophrenia 3:95.Google Scholar
  23. deQuiros, J.B., 1971, Diagnostico diferencial de ladislexia especifica, Fonoaudiologica Buenos Aires 17:117.Google Scholar
  24. Doman, G., and Delacato, C., 1968, Doman-Delacato philosophy, Human Potential 1:113.Google Scholar
  25. Doman, R. J., Spitz, E. R., Zuchman, E. et al. , 1960, Children with severe brain injuries: Neurological organization in terms of mobility, JAMA 17:257.Google Scholar
  26. Feingold, B. F., 1975, Why Your Child is Hyperactive, Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Ferreri, C.A., 1983, Dyslexia and Learning Disabilities Cures, The Digest of Chiropractic Economics 25:74.Google Scholar
  28. Ferreri, C. A., and Wainwright, R. B., 1984, Breakthrough for Dyslexia and Learning Disabilities, Exposition Press of Florida, Inc., Pompano Beach, FL.Google Scholar
  29. Frank, J., and Levinson, H.N., 1977, Anti-motion sickness medications in dysmetric dyslexia and dyspraxia, Academic Therapy 12:411.Google Scholar
  30. Frank, J., and Levinson, H.N., 1973, Dysmetric dyslexia and dyspraxia: Hypothesis and study, J. Am. Acad. Child Psychiatry 12:690.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goyette, C. H., Conners, C. K., Petti, T. A. et al. , 1978, Effects of artificial colors on hyperkinetic children. A double-blind challenge study, Psychopharmacol. Bull 13:13–39.Google Scholar
  32. Harley, J. P., Ray, R. S., Tomasi, L., et al. , 1978, Hyperkinesis and food additives: Testing the Feingold hypothesis, Pediatrics 61:818.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hoffer, A., and Osmond, H., 1960, The Chemical Basis of Clinical Psychiatry, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.Google Scholar
  34. Hoffer, A., Osmond, H., and Symthies, J., 1954, Schizophrenia: A new approach: II.Results of year’s research,J, of Ment. Sci. 100:29–54.Google Scholar
  35. Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential, 1968, A Summary of Concepts Procedures and Organizations, Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  36. Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential, 1965a, Mental Retardation, p. 27, Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential, Canada.Google Scholar
  37. Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential, 1965b, Mental Retardation, p. 27, Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential, p. 27, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  38. Kavale, K.A., and Forness, S.R., 1983, Hyperactivity and diet treatment: A meta-analysis of the Feingold hypothesis, J. Learning Disabil. 16:324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Levinson, H. N., 1984, Smart But Feeling Dumb, Warner Books, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Levinson, H. N., 1980, A Solution to the Riddle Dyslexia. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Levy, F., Dumbrell, S., and Hobbes, G., 1977, Hyperkinesis and diet: A double-blind crossover trial with a tartrazine challenge, Med. J. Aust. 1:61.Google Scholar
  42. Matties, J.A., 1983, The Feingold diet: A current appraisal, J. Learning Disabil. 16:319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Metzger, R.L., and Werner, D.B., 1984, Use of visual training for reading disabilities: A review, Pediatrics 73:824.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. McHugh, H.E., 1962, Auditory and vestibular disturbances in children, Laryngoscopy 72:555.Google Scholar
  45. National Institutes of Health, 1982, Defined Diets and Childhood Hyperactivity, National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Summary, vol. 4, no. 3, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
  46. Osman, B. B., 1982, No One To Play With: The Social Side of Learning Disabilities, Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  47. Osman, B.B., 1979, Learning Disabilities: A Family Affair, Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  48. Paine, R.S., Werry, J.S., and Quay, H.C., 1968, A study of minimal cerebral dysfunction, Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 10:505.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pauling, L., 1968, Orthomolecular psychiatry, Science 160:267.Google Scholar
  50. Polatajko, H.J., 1985, A critical look at vestibular dysfunction in learning-disabled children,Dev. Med. and Child Neurol. 27:283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Prinz, R.J., Roberts, W.A., and Hartman, E., 1980, Dietary correlates of hyperactive behavior in children. J. Consult, and Clin. Psychol. 48:760–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rapoport, J., 1982/1983, Effects of dietary substances in children, J. Psychiatr. Res. 17:187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Silver, L.B., 1984, The Misunderstood Child. A Guide for Parents of Learning Disabled Children, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  54. Silver, L.B., 1981, The relationship between learning disabilities, hyperactivity, distractibility and behavioral problems. A clinical analysis, J. Am. Acad. Child Psychiat. 29:385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Silver, L. B., 1979, Minimal brain dysfunction, in: Basic Handbook of Child Psychiatry, vol. 2 (J. Noshpitz, ed.), pp. 416–439, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  56. Smith, S. L., 1980, No Easy Answers: The Learning Disabled Child at Home and in School, Bantam Books, New York.Google Scholar
  57. Stockwell, C.W., Sherrard, E.S., and Schuler, J.V., 1976, Electronystagmographic findings in dyslexic children, Trans. Am. Acad. Ophthalmol. Otolaryngol. 82:239.Google Scholar
  58. United Cerebral Palsy Association of Texas, 1965, The Doman-Delacato treatment of neurologically handicapped children, Information Bulletin, United Cerebral Palsy Association of Texas, Texas.Google Scholar
  59. Werner, H., and Strauss, A.A., 1941, Pathology of figure-background relation in the child, J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 36:236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Williams, J. I., Cram, D. M., Tausig, P. T., et al. , 1978, Relative effects of drugs and diet on hyperactive behaviors: An experimental study, Pediatrics 61:811.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Larry B. Silver
    • 1
  1. 1.TRI-Services National Institute of DyslexiaChevy ChaseUSA

Personalised recommendations