Abstract

The pharmacological approach to first-stage recovery in acute stroke is aimed at controlling edema and improving microcirculation and cellular protection in the ischemic penumbra. Limiting lesion size with these early measures may influence outcome significantly. Careful methodology is necessary to measure recovery rates and outcome. The extent of recovery is influenced by initial severity. Lesion size in a stroke population correlates significantly with outcome measures. Recovery in the initial period, the first 3 months, is significantly greater in all groups and in all functional deficits. Evidence appears to indicate that both homologous contralateral and ipsilateral functionally connected hemispheric structures play a role in recovery. Comprehension and semantic processing may have more widespread cerebral compensation than motor and assembly functions of language, which are more left hemisphere dependent. Pharmacological studies in recovery must consider these factors and utilize more precise methodology to define functional deficits.

Keywords

Ischemia Dementia Aspirin Serotonin Coumadin 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Astrup, J., Siesjo, B. K., and Symon, L., 1981, Thresholds in cerebral ischemia—the ischemic penumbra, Stroke 12: 723–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Awad, I., Little, J. R., Lucas, F., Skrinska, V., Slugg, R., and Lesser, R. P., 1983, Treatment of acute focal cerebral ischemia with prostacyclin, Stroke 14: 203–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bassi, S., Albizzati, M. G., Sbacchi, M., Frattola, L., and Massarotti, M., 1985, Monosialo-ganglioside therapy in stroke, Stroke 16: 899–900.Google Scholar
  4. Bousser, M. G., Eschwege, E., Haguenau, M., Lefaucconnier, J. M., Thibult, N., and Touboul, D., 1983, “AICLA” controlled trial of aspirin and dipyridamole in the secondary prevention of athero-thrombotic cerebral ischemia, Stroke 14:5–14.Google Scholar
  5. Britton, M., de Faire, U., Helmers, C., Miah, K., and Rane, A., 1980, Lack of effect of theophylline on the outcome of acute cerebral infarction, Acta Neurol. Scand. 62: 116–123.Google Scholar
  6. Broida, H., 1977, Language therapy effects in long term aphasia, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 58: 248–253.Google Scholar
  7. Christensen, M. S., Paulson, O. B., Olesen, J., Alexander, S. C., Skinhoj, E., Dom, W. H., and Lassen, N. A., 1973, Cerebral apoplexy (stroke) treated with or without prolonged artificial hyperventilation. 1. Cerebral circulation, clinical course, and cause of death, Stroke 4: 568–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Czopf, J., 1972, Role of the non-dominant hemisphere in the restitution of speech in aphasia, Arch. Psychiatr. Nervenkr. 216: 162–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Del Zoppo, G. J., Zeumer, H.. and Harker, L. A., 1986, Thrombolytic therapy in stroke: Possibilities and hazards, Stroke 17: 595–607.Google Scholar
  10. Dennis, M., and Kohn, B., 1975, Comprehension of syntax in infantile hemiplegics after cerebral hemidecortication: Left hemisphere superiority, Brain Lang. 2: 472–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dyken, M., and White, P. T., 1956, Evaluation of cortisone in the treatment of cerebral infarction, J.A.M.A. 132: 1531–1956.Google Scholar
  12. Fieschi, C., Lenzi, G. L., and Rasura, M., 1986, Role of calcium entry blockers in neurological diseases, Eur. Neurol. 25(Suppl. 1 ): 68—71.Google Scholar
  13. Flamm, E. S., Demopoilos, H. B., Seligman, M. L., et al., 1977, Possible molecular mecha-nisms of barbiturate-mediated protection in regional cerebral ischemia, Acta Neurol. Scand. 56 (64): 150–151.Google Scholar
  14. Fletcher, A. P., Alkjaersig, M., Lewis, M., Tulevski, V., Davies, A., Brooks, J. E., Mardin, W. B., Landau, W. M., and Raichle, M. E., 1976, A pilot study of urokinase therapy in cerebral infarction, Stroke 7: 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gelners, H. J., 1984, The effects of nimopidine on the clinical course of patients with acute ischemic stroke, Acta Neurol. Scand. 69: 232–239.Google Scholar
  16. Godfrey, C. M., and Douglass, E., 1959, The recovery process in aphasia, Can. Med. Assoc. J. 80: 618–624.Google Scholar
  17. Goodglass, H., and Kaplan, E., 1983, Boston Naming Test, Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  18. Gryglewski, R. J., Nowak, S., Kostka-Trabka, E., Kusmiderski, J., Dembinska-Kiec, A., Bieron, K., Basista, M., and Blaszczyk, B., 1983, Treatment of ischemic stroke with pros-tacyclin, Stroke 14: 197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hachinski, V., and Norris, J. W., 1985, The Acute Stroke, F. A. Davis, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  20. Hass, W. K., 1979, Drug effects in regional cerebral blood flow in focal cerebrovascular disease, J. Neurol. Sci. 19: 461.Google Scholar
  21. Henschen, S. E., 1920-1922, Klinische und anatomische Beitrage zur Pathologic des Gehirns, Volumes 5-7, Nordiska Bokhandel, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  22. Hossman, V., Heiss, W., Bewermeyer, H., and Wiedemann, G., 1983, Controlled trial of ancrod in ischemic stroke, Stroke 40: 803–808.Google Scholar
  23. Huczynski, J., Kostka-Trabka, E., Sotowska, K., Bieron, L., Grodzinska, L., Dembinska- Kiec, A., Pykosz-Mazur, E., Peczak, E., and Gryglewski, R. J., 1985, Double-blind controlled trial of the therapeutic effects of prostacyclin in patients with completed ischemic stroke, Stroke 16: 810–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jabally, J., and Davis, J. N., 1984, Naloxone administration to patients with acute stroke, Stroke 15: 36–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kertesz, A., 1979, Aphasia and Associated Disorders, Grune & Stratton, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Kertesz, A., 1982, The Western Aphasia Battery, Grune & Stratton, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Kertesz, A., Black, S. E., Polk, M., and Howell, J., 1986, Cerebral asymmetries on magnetic resonance imaging, Crotex 22: 117–127.Google Scholar
  28. Kertesz, A., Harlock, W., and Coates, R., 1979, Computer tomographic localization, lesion size and prognosis in aphasia, Brain Lang. 8: 34–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kertesz, A., and McCabe, P., 1977, Recovery patterns and prognosis in aphasia, Brain 100:1- 18.Google Scholar
  30. Kinsbourne, M., 1971, The minor cerebral hemisphere as a source of aphasic speech, Arch. Neurol. 25: 302–306.Google Scholar
  31. Knopman, D. S., Rubens, A. B., Seines, O. A., Klassen, A. C., and Meyer, M. W., 1984, Mechanisms of recovery from aphasia: Evidence from serial xenon 133 cerebral blood flow studies, Ann. Neurol. 15 (6): 530–535.Google Scholar
  32. Knopman, D. S., Seines, O. A., Niccum, N., and Rubens, A. B., 1983, A longitudinal study of speech fluency in aphasia: CT scan correlates of recovery and persistent nonfluency, Neurology (N.Y.) 33: 1170–1178.Google Scholar
  33. Lassen, N. A., and Palvolgyi, R., 1968, Cerebral steal during hypercapnia and the inverse reaction during hypocapnia observed by the 133-xenon technique in man, Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 22: 13D.Google Scholar
  34. Lemay, M., and Kido, D. K., 1978, Asymmetries of the cerebral hemispheres on computed tomograms, J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2: 471–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Levine, D. M., and Mohr, J. P., 1979, Language after bilateral cerebral infarctions: Role of the minor hemisphere, Neurology (Minneap.) 29: 927–938.Google Scholar
  36. Lomas, J., and Kertesz, A., 1978, Patterns of spontaneous recovery in aphasic groups: A study of adult stroke patients, Brain Lang. 5: 388–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ludlow, C., Rosenberg, J., Fair, C., Buck, D., Schesselman, S., and Salazar, A., 1986, Brain lesions associated with nonfluent aphasia fifteen years following penetrating head injury, Brain 109: 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Matthews, W. B., Oxbury, J. M., Grainger, M. R., and Greenhall, R. C. D., 1976, A blind controlled trial of Dextran 40 in the treatment of ischemic stroke, Brain 99: 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meyer, J. S., et al., 1965, Therapeutic thrombolysis in cerebral thrombus-embolism. Ran domized evaluation of intravenous streptokinase, in: Cerebral Vascular Diseases ( C. H. Milli- kan, R. G. Siekert, and J. Whisnant, eds.), Grune & Stratton, New York, pp. 200–213.Google Scholar
  40. Meyer, J. S., Fukuuchi, Y., Shimazu, K., Ohuchi, T., and Ericsson, A. D., 1972, Abnormal hemispheric blood flow and metabolism in cerebrovascular disease, ii. Therapeutic trials with 5% C02 inhalation, hyperventilation and intravenous infusion of THAM and mannitol, Stroke 3: 157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Meyer, J. S., Gotoh, F., Gilroy, J., 1965, Improvement in brain oxygenation and clinical improvement in patients with stroke treated with papaverine hydrochloride. JAMA 194:957- 961.Google Scholar
  42. Meyer, J. S., and Mathew, N. T., 1974, Medical management in cerebral ischemia, in: Contro-versy in Internal Medicine, Volume 2 ( F. Ingelfmger, ed.), W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, p. 111.Google Scholar
  43. Monakow, C. von, 1914, Die Lokalisation im Grosshirn und der Abbau der Funktionen durch corticale Herde, Bergmann, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  44. Norris, J. W,, and Hachinski, V. C., 1985, Megadose steroid therapy in ischemic stroke, Stroke 16: 150.Google Scholar
  45. Peerless, S. J., Ishikawa, R., Hunter, I. G., and Peerless, M. J., 1981, Protective effect of Fluosol-DA in acute cerebral ischemia, Stroke 12: 558–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peerless, S. J., Nakamura, R., Rodriguez-Salazar, A., and Hunter, I. G., 1985, Modification of cerebral ischemia with Fluosol, Stroke 16: 38–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pieniadz, J. M., Naeser, M. A., Koff, E., and Levine, H. L., 1983, CT scan cerebral hemi-spheric asymmetry measurements in stroke cases with global aphasia: Atypical asymmetries associated with improved recovery, Cortex 19: 371–393.Google Scholar
  48. Plum, F., 1983, What causes infarction in ischemic brain? Neurology (N.Y.) 33:222- 233.Google Scholar
  49. Sabel, B. A., Slavin, M. D., and Stein, D. G., 1984, GMI ganglioside treatment facilitates behavioral recovery from bilateral brain damage, Science 225: 340–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Seines, O. A., Knopman, D. S., Niccum, N., and Rubens, A. B., (1983), CT scan correlates of auditory comprehension deficits in aphasia: A prospective recovery study, Ann. Neurol. 13:558- 566.Google Scholar
  51. Smith, A., 1966, Speech and other functions after left (dominant) hemispherectomy, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 29: 467–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith, A. L., Hoff, J. T., and Nielsen, S. L., 1974, Barbiturate protection in acute focal cerebral ischemia, Stroke 5: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stein, H. D., Rosen, J. J., and Butters, N., 1974, Plasticity and Recovery of Function in the Central Nervous System, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  54. Stoessl, A. J., Young, G. B., and Feasby, T. E., 1985, Intracerebral hemorrhage and an-giographic beading following ingestion of catecholaminergics, Stroke 16: 734–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Strand, T., Asplund, K., Eriksson, S., Hagg, E., Lithner, F., and Wester, P., 1984, A ran-domized controlled trial of hemodilution therapy in acute ischemic stroke, Stroke 15: 980–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. TIMI Study Group, 1985, Special report: The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) trial, N. Engl. J. Med. 312: 932–936.Google Scholar
  57. Wauquier, A., 1984, Effect of calcium entry blockers in models of brain hypoxia, in: Calcium Entry Blockers in Cardiovascular and Cerebral Dysfunctions ( Godfraind, Herman, and Well- ens, eds.), Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp. 241–254.Google Scholar
  58. Woods, B. T., and Teuber, H. L., 1978, Changing patterns of childhood aphasia, Ann. Neurol. 3: 273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zaidel, E., 1976, Auditory vocabulary in the right hemisphere following brain bisection or hemidecortication, Cortex 12: 191–211.Google Scholar
  60. Zivin, J. A., and Venditto, J. A., 1984, Experimental CNS ischemia: Serotonin antagonists reduce or prevent damage, Neurology (N.Y.) 34: 469–474.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Kertesz
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Institute, St. Joseph’ HospitalUniversity of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations