Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter surveys the application of behavioral techniques to probationers and parolees. As we discuss later in the chapter, probation and parole officers face a set of demands that can be reconceptualized in behavioral terms. Principles of behavioral intervention and case management can then be derived that would be predicted to be effective change techniques for the probationers/ parolees. Polakow (1974), an early advocate of behavioral approaches to probation, has developed behavioral reconceptualizations of traditional probation activities such as record keeping, treatment plans, structures of contact with the probationer, accountability, and the use of incentives with probationers (see Nietzel, 1979, p. 191). The goals of these reconceptualizations have been to (1) reduce the use of aversive control with offenders, (2) tailor interventions to the individual needs of each client, (3) provide efficient, relatively easily learned techniques that can be applied in the natural environment, and (4) increase the chances that probation and parole will lead to the successful adjustment of the offender in the community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abadinsky, H. (1977). Probation and parole: Theory and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. F., & Parsons, B. V. (1973). Short-term behavioral intervention with delinquent families: Impact on family process and recidivism. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 81, 219–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, H. E., & Simonsen, C. E. (1975). Corrections in America: An introduction. Beverly Hills: Glencoe Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagley, J. J. (1979). Why Illinois adopted determinate sentencing. Judicature, 62, 390–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, G. S. (1982). Training behavior change agents: A conceptual review. Behavior Therapy, 13, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudin, H., Valentine, V., Ingraham, R., Brantley, J., Ruiz, M., Smith, G., Catlin, R., & Regan, E. (1974). Contingency contracting with drug addicts in the natural environment. Unpublished manuscript, University of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. A. (1980). Conventional education and controlled drinking education courses with convicted drunken drivers. Behavior Therapy, 11, 632–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhart, B. R., Behles, M., & Stumphauzer, J. S. (1976). Training juvenile probation officers in behavior modification: Knowledge, attitude change, or behavioral competence. Behavior Therapy, 7, 47–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, W. T. (1979). Determinate sentencing in California and Illinois: Its effect on sentence disparity and prisoner rehabilitation. Washington University Law Quarterly, 1979, 551–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, L. P. (1977). Probation and parole: Legal and social dimensions. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavender, C. (1982). Parole: A critical analysis. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, N. P., & Gobert, J. J. (1983). The law of probation and parole. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, A. W. (1982). Behavioral objectives in probation and parole: A new approach to staff accountability. Federal Probation, 46, 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deibert, A. N., & Golden, F. (1973). Behavior modification workshop with juvenile offenders: Brief report. Behavior Therapy, 4, 586–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doctor, R. M., & Polakow, R. L. (1973). A behavior modification program for adult probationers. Proceedings of the 81st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association (pp. 941–942). Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Empey, L. T., & Rabow, J. (1961). The Provo experiment in delinquency rehabilitation. American Sociological Review, 26, 679–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, D. (1969). The effectiveness of a prison and parole system. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M. R. (1979). Parole guidelines and the reduction of sentencing disparity: A preliminary study. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 16, 218–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griswold, D. B., & Wiatrowski, M. D. (1983). The emergence of determinate sentencing. Federal Probation, 47, 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. M., Loeb, P., Coyne, K., & Cooper, J. (1981). Increasing employment in ex-heroin addicts I: Criminal justice sample. Behavior Therapy, 12, 443–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. M., Loeb, P., LeVois, M., & Cooper, J. (1981). Increasing employment in ex-heroin addicts II: Methadone maintenance sample. Behavior Therapy, 12, 453–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartinger, W., Eldefonso, E., & Coffey, A. (1973). Corrections: A component of the criminal justice system. Pacific Palisades, CA: Goodyear Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazel, J. S., Schumaker, J. B., Sherman, J. A., & Sheldon-Wildgen, J. (1982). Group training for social skills. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 9, 35–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irving, L. H., & Sandhu, H. S. (1973). Offender typology and family interaction: An evaluation of probation success in Oklahoma. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, R. B. (1965). Can conditioning principles be applied to probation? TrialJudges Journal, 4, 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. J., & Azrin, N. H. (1973). An experimental application of a social reinforcement approach to the problem of job finding. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 345–353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolko, D. J., & Milan, M. A. (1983). Reframing and paradoxical instruction to overcome “resistance” in the treatment of delinquent youths: A multiple baseline analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 655–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasnegor, L., & Boudin, H. (1973). Behavior modification and drug addiction: The state of the art. Proceedings of The 81st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association (pp. 913–914). Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, D., Martinson, R., & Wilks, J. (1975). The effectiveness of correctional treatment: A survey of treatment evaluation studies. New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maletzky, B. M. (1980). Self-referred versus court-referred sexually deviant patients: Success with assisted covert sensitization. Behavior Therapy, 11, 306–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manson, J. R. (1977). Determinate sentencing. Crime and Delinquency, 23, 204–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinson, R. (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. Public Interest, 35, 22–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinson, R., & Wilks, J. (1977). Save parole supervision. Federal Probation, 41, 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, C. L. (Ed.). (1968). Source book on probation, parole and pardons (3rd ed.). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzel, M. T. (1979). Crime and its modification: A social learning prospective. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polakow, R. L. (1974). Establishing behavior therapy in a public agency. Paper presented at the annual meeting of The Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polakow, R. L. (1975). Covert sensitization treatment of a probationed barbiturate addict. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 6, 53–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polakow, R. L., & Doctor, R. M. (1973). Treatment of marijuana and barbiturate dependency by contingency contracting. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 4, 375–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polakow, R. L., & Doctor, R. M. (1974). A behavioral modification program for adult drug offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 11, 63–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polakow, R. L. & Peabody, D. (1975). Behavioral treatment of child abuse. InternationalJournal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 19, 100–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, S. (1973). Law of criminal correction. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumney, J., & Murphy, J. P. (1968). Probation and social adjustment. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R. F. (1971). The effectiveness of probation. In L. Radzinowiez & M. E. Wolfgang (Eds.), The criminal in confinement (pp. 211–218 ). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, S. (1982). Social skills training with young offenders. In P. Feldman (Ed.), Developments in the study of criminal behavior (Vol. 1): The prevention and control of offending (pp. 107–134 ). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumphauzer, J. S. (1986). Helping delinquents change: A treatment manual of social learning approaches. New York: The Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumphauzer, J. S., Candelora, K., & Venema, H. B. (1976). A follow-up of probation officers trained in behavior modification. Behavior Therapy, 7, 713–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tappan, P. (1960). Crime, justice and correction. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tharp, R. G., & Wetzel, R. J. (1969). Behavior modification in the natural environment. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, G. L., Tharp, R. G., & Wetzel, R. J. (1967). Behavior modification techniques: New tools for probation officers. Federal Probation, 31, 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twentyman, C. T., Jensen, M., & Kloss, J. D. (1978). Social skills training for the complex offender: Employment seeking skills. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 34, 320–326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice (1974). Success and failure of federal offenders released in 1970. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice (1982). Bureau of Justice Statistics: Bulletin, Probation and Parole 1981. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hirsch, A. (1976). Doing justice. NY: Hill & Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hirsch, A., & Hanrahan, K. (1979). The question of parole: Retention, reform, or abolition. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hirsch, A., & Hanrahan, K. (1981). Determinate penalty systems in America: An overview. Crime and Delinquency, 27, 289–316.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nietzel, M.T., Himelein, M.J. (1987). Probation and Parole. In: Morris, E.K., Braukmann, C.J. (eds) Behavioral Approaches to Crime and Delinquency. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0903-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0903-1_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8237-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0903-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics