N-Way Factor Analysis for Obtaining Personality, Situation, and Test Form Contributions to a Psychological Response

Illustrated by a Three-Way Plasmode
  • Raymond B. Cattell
  • Dan D. Blaine
  • Jerry Brennan
Part of the Perspectives on Individual Differences book series (PIDF)

Abstract

The present contribution can be regarded by statisticians as a first mathematical-statistical illustration of N-way factoring as previously given in algebraic outline (Cattell, 1980). But to the psychologist it is something more, namely, an answer to the problem raised in various ways over the last 30 years of integrating personality traits, specific behaviors, and environmental situations in a single predictive system (Cattell, 1934, 1968, 1972). Indeed, it was in the psychological context that a behavior specification equation was first proposed by Cattell (1978, 1979) combining the factorial properties and values of person, stimulus, response form, and ambient situation.

Keywords

Attenuation Covariance Hunt Prefix Summing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barker, R. G. Ecological psychology: concepts and methods for studying the environment. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  2. Burt, C. L. Correlations between persons. British Journal of Psychology, 1937, 28, 56–96.Google Scholar
  3. Cattell, R. B. The measurement of interest. Character and Personality, 1934, 3, 54–63.Google Scholar
  4. Cattell, R. B. The description and measurement of personality. New York: World Book, 1946.Google Scholar
  5. Cattell, R. B. Formulating the environmental situation, and its perception, in behavior theory. In S. B. Sells (Ed.), Stimulus determinants of behavior. New York: Ronald Press, 1963.Google Scholar
  6. Cattell, R. B. (Ed.) Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.Google Scholar
  7. Cattell, R. B. Trait view theory of perturbations in ratings and self ratings: Its application to obtaining pure trait score estimates in questionnaires. Psychological Review, 1968, 75, 96–113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cattell, R. B. Real base, true zero factor analyses. Multivariate Behavioral Research Monograph No. 72. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  9. Cattell, R. B. Personality and mood by questionnaire. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1973.Google Scholar
  10. Cattell, R. B. The scientific use of factor analyses. New York: Plenum Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  11. Cattell, R. B. Personality and learning theory. Vol. 1. New York: Springer, 1979.Google Scholar
  12. Cattell, R. B. Personality and learning theory. Vol. 2. New York: Springer, 1980.Google Scholar
  13. Cattell, R. B., and Vogelmann, S. A comprehensive trial of the scree & K G criteria for determining the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1977, 12, 289–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cattell, R. B., Coulter, M. A., and Tsujioka, B. The taxonomic recognition of types of functional emergents. In R. B. Cattell (Ed.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.Google Scholar
  15. Endler, N. S., and Hunt, J. M. Sources of behaviour variance as measured by the S-R inventory of anxiousness. Psychological Bulletin, 1966, 65, 336–346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Golding, S. Flies in the ointment. Psychological Bulletin, 1975, 82, 404–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gorsuch, R. L. Factor analysis. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1974.Google Scholar
  18. Hakstian, R., Rogers, W., and Cattell, R. B. An evaluation of the scree and other tests for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1982, 17, 191–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Levin, J. Three mode factor analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 1965, 64, 442–452.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Magnusson, D., and Endler, N. S. Personality at the crossroads. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1977.Google Scholar
  21. Mischel, W. Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley, 1968.Google Scholar
  22. Ross, J. The relations between test and person factors. Psychological Review, 1963, 70, 432–443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sells, S. B. (Ed.) Stimulus determinants of behavior. New York: Ronald Press, 1963.Google Scholar
  24. Stephenson, W. Q-technique and its methodology. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
  25. Tucker, L. R. Implications of factor analysis of three-way matrices for measurement of change. In C. W. Harris (Ed.), Problems in measuring change. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1963.Google Scholar
  26. Tucker, L. R. The extension of factor analysis to three-dimensional matrices. In N. Frederiksen and H. Gulliksen (Eds.), Contributions to mathematical psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1964.Google Scholar
  27. Tucker, L. R. Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1966, 31, 279–311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wittmann, W. W. Der Mangel an Multivariatem Denken mit Bezug auf Klassifaktionen von Situationen. In L. Eckensberger (Ed.), Bericht uber den 31 Kangness der Duetschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie. Göttingen: Hogrefe, 1979.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raymond B. Cattell
    • 1
  • Dan D. Blaine
    • 1
  • Jerry Brennan
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HawaiiHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations