Skip to main content

Geology

  • Chapter
  • 1490 Accesses

Abstract

The importance of regional-areal investigations for obtaining geosciences data critical to a natural site or material is frequently overlooked. Project sponsors have commonly kept the efforts of the exploration team close to the site for the planning-design phases. This approach has disregarded the importance of much pertinent geological information because sites rarely conform to a “type” interpretation. Actually, an understanding of controlling conditions, history, and causes can prove more advantageous to an engineering objective than more detailed knowledge of a restricted site. Several examples of investigations in which an inadequate understanding of the areal rock sequence/structure subsequently affected project design are given under case histories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Geological Considerations; Regional-Areal Geoscience Investigations

  1. Kiersch, G. A., and Hughes, P. W., “Structural Localization of Ground Water in Limestones-Big Bend District, Texas-Mexico,” Economic Geology, Vol. 47, No. 8, pp. 794–806, 1952. (Regional investigation 300 miles Rio Grande for dam sites.)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kiersch, G. A., “Regional Mapping Program of Southern Pacific Company,” Bulletin Geological Society America, Vol. 69, p. 1691, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kiersch, G. A., “Trends in Engineering Geology in the United States,” Rock Mechanics and Engineering Geology, Springer-Verlag, Wien, Suppl. I, pp. 31–57, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kiersch, G. A., et al., Mineral Resources, Navajo-Hopi Indian Reservations, Arizona-Utah, Vol. I-General Geology and Minerals-Fuels (74 pp.); Vol. II-Non-Metallic Minerals (98 pp.); Vol. III-Construction Materials (76 pp.), University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kiersch, G. A., “Regional-Areal Geologic Investigations in Highway Geology,” in Scott, L. W. (ed.), Proceedings 13th Annual Highway Geology Symposium, Arizona Highway Department, Phoenix, AR, pp. 121–160, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kiersch, G. A., “Geological Reconnaissance and Evaluation of 22-Preferred Sites New York State—New Site Selection Study,” United Engineers Constructors, Boston and New York State Electric & Gas, Binghamton, NY, 195 pp., 32 fig., Dec. 5, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schowengerdt, R. A., and Glass, C. E., “Digitally Processed Topographic Data for Regional Tectonic Evaluations,” Bulletin Geological Society America, Vol. 94, pp. 549–556, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Keaton, J. R., “Genesis-Lithology-Qualifier (GLQ) System of Engineering Geology Mapping Symbols,” Bulletin Association Engineering Geologists, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 355–364, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hannan, D. L., “Geotechnical Mapping Symbols (GEMS),” Bulletin Association Engineering Geologists, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 343–344, 1984.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Arnold, A. B., “Geologic Mapping of Dam Site,” in Golzé, A. R. (ed.), Handbook of Dam Engineering, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, 1977, pp. 204–207.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wallace, R. E. (ed.), Studies in Geophysics—Active Tectonics, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1986, Chap. 7-Mayer, L., “Tectonic Geomorphology,” pp. 125–135; Chap. 8-Keller, E. A., “Surficial Earth Processes,” pp. 136–147; Chap. 5-Schrumm, S. A., “Alluvial River Response,” pp. 80–94; Chap. 9-Allen, C. R., “Seismological and Paleoseismological Techniques,” pp. 148–154.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Piteau, D. R., Mylrea, F. H., and Blown, I. G., “Downie Slide, Columbia, British Columbia, Canada,” in Voight, B. (ed.), Rock-slides and Avalanches, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1979, Vol. I, Chap. 10, pp. 365–392.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brown, R. L., and Psutka, J. F., “Structural and Stratigraphie Setting of the Downie Slide, Columbia River Valley, British Columbia,” Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 698–709, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gardner, W. I. “Report Data on Downie Slide, Columbia River, Canada,” personal communication, May 2, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Philbrick, S. S., “Kinzua Dam and the Glacial Foreland,” in Coates, D. R. (ed.), Geomorphology and Engineering, Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross, Stroudsburg, PA., 1976, pp. 175–197.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Carll, J. F. “The Geology of the Oil Region of Warren, Venango, Clarion and Butler Counties,” Second Geological Survey of Pennsylvania 1875–79 III, Report of Progress, 1880, pp. 352–353.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fisher, P. R., and Banks, D. C, “Influence of the Regional Geologic Setting on Site Geologic Features,” in Dowding, C. H. (ed.), Site Characterization and Exploration, Proceedings Workshop, Northwestern University, American Society Civil Engineers, Geo-technical Division, June 1978.

    Google Scholar 

Seismotectonic Investigations

  1. Jansen, R. B., Dams and Public Safety, U.S. Department of Interior, Water and Power Resources Service, 1980, 332 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sherard, J. L., Cluft, L. S., and Allen, C. R., “Potentially Active Faults in Dam Foundations,” Geotechnique, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 367–428, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Seed, H. B., Lee, K. L., and Idriss, I. M., “An Analysis of the Sheffield Dam Failure,” Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 95, No. SM6, Proc. Paper 6906, pp. 1453–1490, Nov. 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Seed, H. B., et al., “The Slides in the San Fernando Dams During the Earthquake of February 9, 1971,” Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 101, No. GT7, Proc. Paper 11541, pp. 651–688, Sept. 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cortright, Clifford J., and James, Laurence B., “Investigation of the Montana Earthquake of August 17, 1959,” California Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, CA, unpublished report on file, Sept. 2, 1959, 24 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Housner, George W., et al., “Liquefaction of Soils during Earthquakes,” National Research Council, Committee on Earthquake Engineering, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1985, 220 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Seed, H. B., “Earthquake-Resistant Design of Earth Dams,” International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, University of Missouri, Rolla, Vol. 3, pp. 1157–1173, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Anonymous, “Three Dams on San Andreas Fault Have Resisted Earthquakes,” Engineering News Record, Vol. 109, No. 8, pp. 218–219, Aug. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Water and Power Resources Service, “Feasibility Design Summary Auburn Dam Concrete Curved-Gravity Dam Alternative (CG-3), Auburn-Folsom South Unit, Central Valley Project, California,” U.S. Department of Interior, Water and Power Resources Service, Denver, CO, Aug. 1980, 40 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Seed, H. B., Makdisi, F. I., and DeAlba, P., “The Performance of Earth Dams During Earthquakes,” Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report No. EERC 77–20, University of California, Berkeley, Aug. 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Golzé, Alfred R. (ed.), Handbook of Dam Engineering, Section 4.2, “Earthquake Hazard,” by George W. Housner, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, 1977, pp. 248–265.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Allen, Clarence R., “Geological Criteria for Evaluating Seismicity,” Geological Society of America Bulletin, Vol. 86, No. 8, pp. 1041–1057, Aug. 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Idriss, I. M., “Evaluating Seismic Risk in Engineering Practice,” Proceedings XI International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, San Francisco, pp. 255–320, Aug. 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Slemmons, D. B., and McKinney, Roy, “Definition of Active Fault,” U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, Misc. Report S-77–8, May 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  15. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, “Interim Procedure for Specifying Earthquake Motions,” Office of Chief of Engineers, Washington, DC, Engineer Technical Letter No. 1110–2–301, Aug. 1983, 8 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shah, Haresh C, et al., “Glossary of Terms for Probabilistic Seismic-Risk and Hazard Analysis,” Earthquake Spectra, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Committee on Seismic Risk, Berkeley, CA, No. 1, pp. 33–40, Nov. 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Abraham, Thomas J., et al., “Federal Guidelines for Earthquake Analyses and Design of Dams,” Federal Emergency Management Agency, Interagency Committee on Dam Safety, Design Earthquake Task Group Subcommittee, Washington, DC, Mar., 1985, 32 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Horowitz, G. F., et al., “Guidelines for Selecting Seismic Parameters for Dam Projects,” USCOLD Committee on Earthquakes, May 1985, 39 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Housner, George W., et al., “Safety of Dams-Flood and Earthquake Criteria,” National Research Council, Committee on Safety Criteria for Dams, National Academy Press, 1985, pp. 24–34, 61–73, 106–109.

    Google Scholar 

  20. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, “Earthquake Design and Analysis for Corps of Engineers Projects,” Office of Chief of Engineers, Washington, DC, Engineering Regulation 1110–2–1806, May 16, 1983, 4 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shlemon, Roy J., “Application of Soil-Stratigraphic Techniques to Engineering Geology,” Bulletin of the Association of Engineering Geologists, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 129–139, May 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Slemmons, D. B., and Glass, C. E., “State-of-the-Art for Assessing Earthquake Harzards in the United States, Imagery in Earthquake Analysis,” U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, Report 11, Dec. 1978, 221 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Idriss, I. M., Cluff, L. S., Tocher, D., Makdisi, F., and Kneupfer, P. L., “Geologic, Seismologic and Geotechnical Considerations Related to Performance of Dams during Earthquakes,” Transactions, 13th International Congress on Large Dams, New Delhi, Vol. II, pp. 1425–1446, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cluff, L. S., and Cluff, J. L., “Importance of Assessing Degrees of Fault Activity of Engineering Decisions,” Proceedings 8th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vol. II, pp. 629–636, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jansen, Robert B., et al., Safety of Existing Dams-Evaluation and Improvement, National Research Council Committee on Safety of Existing Dams, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1983, pp. 132–181.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bonilla, M. G., and Buchanan, J. M., “Interim Report on Worldwide Historic Surface Faulting,” U.S. Geological Survey, Open File Report, 1970, 32 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Slemmons, D. B., “State-of-the-Art for Assessing Earthquake Hazards in the United States, Faults and Earthquake Magnitude,” U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicks-burg, MS, Report 6, May 1977, 149 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Land Subsidence

  1. Holzer, Thomas L., “Man Induced Land Subsidence,” Reviews in Engineering Geology VI, Geological Society of America, 1984, p. ix.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Poland, Joseph F., Guidebook to Studies of Land Subsidence Due to Ground-Water Withdrawal, UNESCO, 1984, pp. 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yerkes, R. F., and Castle, R. O., “Surface Deformation Associated with Oil and Gas Field Operations in the United States,” Association Internationale D’Hydrologie Scientifique, 1969, pp. 57–58.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Allen, D. R., “The Mechanics of Compaction and Rebound, Wilmington Oilfield, Long Beach, California,” City of Long Beach, CA, 1969, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Poland, J. F., Guidebook to Studies of Land Subsidence Due to Ground-Water Withdrawal, UNESCO, 1984, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Narasimhan, T. N., and Goyal, K. P., “Subsidence Due to Geo-thermal Fluid Withdrawal,” Reviews in Engineering Geology VI, 1984, p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holzer, Thomas L., letter to the author dated May 9, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Steiner, W. E., State of Arizona, Department of Water Resources, correspondence with the author, June 12, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Helm, D. C., “Field-Based Computational Techniques for Predicting Subsidence Due to Fluid Withdrawal,” Reviews in Engineering Geology VI, Geological Society of America, 1984, pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Poland, Joseph F., Guidebook to Studies of Land Subsidence Due to Ground-Water Withdrawal, UNESCO, 1984, pp. 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Allen, D. R., “The Mechanics of Compaction and Rebound, Wilmington Oil Field, Long Beach, California,” Dept. of Oil Properties, City of Long Beach, CA, 1969, pp. 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lofgren, Ben E., “Land Subsidence Due to the Application of Water,” Reviews in Engineering Geology II, Geological Society of America, 1969, pp. 272–273.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bara, J. P., and Gibbs, H. J., as reported by Lofgren (see reference 12, pp. 289–294).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gardner, W. I., “Dams and Reservoirs in Pleistocene Eolian Terrain of Nebraska and Kansas,” Bull. Assn. Engr. Geologists, Vol. 6, pp. 31–44, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bull, W. B., “Physical and Textural Features of Deposits Associated with Near-Surface Subsidence in Western Fresno County, California,” Geology Society of America Bulletin, Vol. 70, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lucas, Clifford V., et al., “Design and Construction Studies of Shallow Land Subsidence for the California Aqueduct in the San Joaquin Valley,” State of California Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, CA, Dec. 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lucas, Clifford V., and James, L. B., “Land Subsidence and the California State Water Project,” Publication No. 121 of the International Assn. of Hydrological Sciences, Proceedings of the Anaheim Symposium, Dec. 1976, p. 177.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Newton, John G., “Induced Sinkholes: An Engineering Problem,” Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, ASCE, Vol. 107, No. IR2, Proc. Paper 16343, pp. 175–185, June 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ege, John R., “Mechanisms of Surface Subsidence Resulting from Solution Extraction of Salt,” Reviews in Engineering Geology VI, Geological Society of America, 1984, p. 203.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Federal Power Commission, Bureau of Power, “Investigation of Failure of Walter Bouldin Dam and Safety of Other Dams of the Alabama Power Co.,” Feb. 1976, pp. 2–79–2–92.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lucas, Clifford V., and James, L. B., “Land Subsidence and the California State Water Project,” Publication No. 121 of the International Assn. of Hydrological Sciences, Proceedings Anaheim Symposium, Dec. 1976, p. 177.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Newton, John G., “Early Detection and Correction of Sinkhole Problems in Alabama with a Preliminary Evaluation of Remote Sensing Applications,” U.S. Geological Survey in Cooperation with Alabama Highway Dept. and U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Jan. 1976, pp. 10–23.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rellensmann, Otto, “Rock Mechanics in Regard to Static Loading Caused by Mining Excavation,” 2nd Annual Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Golden, CO, Colorado School of Mines Quarterly, Vol. 52, pp. 35–49, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gray, Richard E., and Brunn, Robert W., “Coal Mine Subsidence-Eastern United States,” Reviews in Engineering Geology VI, Geological Society of America, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Butler, D. K., and Murphy, W. L., “Evaluation of Geophysical Methods for Cavity Detection at the WES Cavity Test Facility,” Technical Report No. GL-80-4, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, June 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ballard, Robert F., “Tunnel Detection,” Technical Report No. GL-82-9, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sept. 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Newton, J. G., and Hyde, L. W., “Sinkhole Problem in and Near Roberts Industrial Subdivision, Birmingham, Alabama—a Reconnaissance,” Alabama Geological Survey Circ. 68, 1971, 42 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stephens, John C, Allen, Leon H., and Chen, Ellen, “Organic Soil Subsidence,” Geological Society of America, Reviews in Engineering Geology VI, 1984, p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stephens, John C, Allen, Leon H., and Chen, Ellen, “Organic Soil Subsidence,” Geological Society of America, Reviews in Engineering Geology VI, 1984, p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stephens, John C, Allen, Leon H., and Chen, Ellen, “Organic Soil Subsidence,” Geological Society of America, Reviews in Engineering Geology VI, 1984, p. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Taylor, Donald W., Fundamentals of Soil Mechanics, eighth printing, Wiley, New York, 1955, p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Stephens, John C, Allen, Leon H., and Chen, Ellen, “Organic Soil Subsidence,” Reviews in Engineering Geology VI, Geological Society of America, 1984, p. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Korpijaakko, E. O., and Radforth, N. W., “Development of Certain Patterned Ground Muskeg as Interpreted from Aerial Photographs,” Proceedings of the 3rd International Peat Conference, Quebec, 1968 (as reported in reference 28, p. 118).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fowler, G., “Shrinkage of the Peat Covered Fenlands,” Geographical Journal, Vol. 81, London, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Myers, W. B., and Hamilton, Warren, “Deformation Accompanying the Hebgen Lake Earthquake of August 17, 1959,” U.S. Geological Survey Prof. Paper 435–1, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Jackson, Wayne H., “Changes in the Floor of Hebgen Lake,” Geological Survey Prof. Paper 435-H, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Cortright, C. J., and James, L. B., “Investigation of the Montana Earthquake of August 17, 1959,” unpublished report dtd. Sept. 2, 1959, on file at the California Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, CA.

    Google Scholar 

Foundation Defects

  1. “Colstrip Project Investigation and Control of Seepage of the Surge Pond Dam,” Montana Power Company, Bechtel Office Report, Apr. 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  2. “Colstrip Project, Effluent Holding Pond, Design Report, ”Montana Power Company, Bechtel Office Report, Oct. 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Peacock, R. T., and Arnold, A. B., “Foundation Treatment for Control of Seepage at Boardman Dam,” International Congress on Large Dams, Lausanne, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Report of the Commission, “Causes Leading to the Failure of the St. Francis Dam,” California State Printing Office, Sacramento, CA, 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  5. California State Water Project, Vol. III, “Storage Facilities,” Bulletin No. 200, State of Calif. Dept. of Water Resources, Nov. 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  6. “Investigation of Failure Baldwin Hills Reservoir,” State of Calif. Dept. of Water Resources, Apr. 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  7. “Design and Analysis of Auburn Dam,” Vol. II, “Foundation Studies,” U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  8. “Failure of Teton Dam,” A Report of Findings, U.S. Department of Interior, Teton Dam Failure Review Group, Apr. 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  9. “Failure of Teton Dam,” Independent Panel to Review Cause of Teton Dam Failure, U.S. Department of Interior, Dec. 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bowes, D. E., and O’Neill, A. L., “Treatment for Sealing and Drainage—Green Lake Arch Dam Foundation,” International Congress on Large Dams, Lausanne, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Underwood, L. B., Thorfinnson, S. T., and Black, W. T., “Rebound in Redesign of Oahe Dam Hydraulic Structures,” Journal of the Soils Mechanics and Foundation Division, Proceedings of the ASCE, Mar. 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lane, K. S., “Designing for Foundation Movements at Garrison Dam,” Fifth Congress on Large Dams, Paris, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arnold, A. B., and Hanegan, G. L., “Rebound and Foundation Settlement at Castaic Dam, Los Angeles County, Calif.,” Bulletin of the Association of Engineering Geologists, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Burwell, B. B., and Moneymaker, B. C., “Geology in Dam Construction,” The Geological Society of America, Application of Geology to Engineering Practice, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bozovic, A., Budanur, H., Nonveiller, E., and Pavlin, B., “The Keban Dam Foundation on Karstified Limestone,” Bulletin of the International Association of Engineering Geology, No. 24, pp. 45–51, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Esen, T., and Seghun, S., “Foundation Problems in Keban Dam and the Cut-off Wall.” Transactions of the Tenth International Congress on Large Dams, Montreal, Canada, June 1–5, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Robert B. Jansen (Consulting Civil Engineer)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Van Nostrand Reinhold

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arnold, A.B., James, L.B., Kiersch, G.A., O’Neill, A.L. (1988). Geology. In: Jansen, R.B. (eds) Advanced Dam Engineering for Design, Construction, and Rehabilitation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0857-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0857-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8205-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0857-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics