Skip to main content

Abstract

The Handbook of Dam Engineering 1 presented the subject of concrete dam design from fundamental definitions of terms through planning, design, and construction considerations. Most of that information is still pertinent and usable. Those portions directed toward arch dam design are still relevant for new dam design and the evaluation and rehabilitation of existing dams. With the Handbook and other well-accepted references as background, this chapter takes the opportunity to discuss areas of new and updated technology. The aspects of arch dam design that represent the most important changes in the last decade are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Golzé, Alfred R. (ed.), Handbook of Dam Engineering, Van Nos-trand Reinhold, New York, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  2. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Design of Arch Dams, Denver, CO, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  3. National Program of Inspection of Dams, Vols. 1–5, Office of the, Chief of Engineers, Department of the Army, Washington, DC, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  4. “Improving Federal Dam Safety,” Report of the Federal Coordinating Council for Science, Engineering and Technology, Nov. 15, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  5. “Federal Dam Safety,” Report of OSTP Independent Review Panel, Washington, DC, Dec. 6, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  6. “Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety,” FCCSET Ad Hoc Interagency Committee on Dam Safety, Washington, DC, June 25, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Committee on the Safety of Existing Dams, Safety of Existing Dams-Evaluation and Improvement, prepared under auspices of Water Science and Technology Board, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, National Research Council, Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Committee on Safety Criteria for Dams, Safety of Dams-Flood and Earthquake Criteria, prepared under auspices of Water Science and Technology Board, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, National Research Council, Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  9. U.S. Committee on Large Dams, “Current United States Practice for Numerical Analysis of Dams,” Report of USCOLD Committee on Methods of Numerical Analysis of Dams, Feb. 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  10. U.S. Committee on Large Dams, “Guidelines for Selection of Seismic Parameters for Dam Projects,” Report of USCOLD Committee on Earthquakes, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  11. U.S. Committee on Large Dams, “Dam Safety Practices and Concerns in the United States,” Report of USCOLD Committee on Technical Activities, April 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Housner, G. W., “Behavior of Structures During Earthquakes,” Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, Vol. 85, No. EM 4, Oct. 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bureau of Reclamation, Design and Analysis of Auburn Dam, Vol. 4, Dynamic Studies, Denver, CO, Apr. 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Clough, R. W., and Zienkiewicz, O. C, “Finite Element Methods in Analysis and Design of Dams-Part C,” Criteria and Assumptions for Numerical Analysis of Dams, Proceedings of an International Symposium, Swansea, U.K., Sept. 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lindvall, Richter and Associates, “Final Report for Investigation and Reanalysis of the Big Tujunga Dam,” Vol. 2 of 3, Los Angeles, CA, Oct. 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  16. “Laboratory Testing Program to Evaluate Physical Properties of Auburn Dam Design Concrete Mix for Rapid Strain Rates-Central Valley Project, California,” Memorandum from Chief, Dam Branch to Chief, Concrete and Structural Branch, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, CO, Aug. 29, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Raphael, Jerome M., “Tensile Strength of Concrete,” ACI Journal, Proc. Vol. 81, No. 2, pp. 158–165, Mar.-Apr. 1984.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Soroushian, P., Choi, Ki-Bong, and Alhamad, Abdulazig, “Dynamic Constitutive Behavior of Concrete,” ACI Journal, Proc. Vol. 83, No. 2, pp. 251–259, Mar.-Apr. 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mlakar, P. F., Vitaya-Udom, K. P., and Cole, R. A., “Dynamic Tensile-Compressive Behavior of Concrete,” ACI Journal, Proc. Vol. 82, No. 4, pp. 484–491, July-Aug. 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  20. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, “Dynamic Properties of Concrete Under Rapid Loading Tests,” Laboratory Report, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dungar, R., “El Cajon Hydroelectric Power Plant, Arch Dam Final Design, Static and Dynamic Stress Analysis,” Motor Columbus Consulting Engineers, Baden, p. 25, May 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Howell, C. H., and Jaquith, A. C, “Analysis of Arch Dams by the Trial Load Method,” Transactions ASCE, Vol. 93, pp. 1191–1316, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  23. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, “Trial Load Method of Analyzing Arch Dams,” Bulletin 1, Part V-Technical Investigations, Boulder Canyon Project Final Report, United States Department of the Interior, Denver, CO, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Moses, Fred, “Optimum Structural Design Using Linear Programming,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 90, No. ST6, Proc. Paper 4163, pp. 89–104, Dec. 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sharpe, R., “Optimum Design of Arch Dams,” Proceedings Inst. of Civil Engineers, Suppl. Vol., Paper 72005, pp. 73–98, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wasserman, Klaus, “Three-Dimensional Shape Optimization of Arch Dams with Prescribed Shape Functions,” Journal of Structural Mechanics, Vol. II, No. 4, pp. 465–489, University of Kaiserslautern, West Germany, 1983–84.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Boggs, H., and Mays, J., “Effects of Vertical Contraction Joints on the Dynamic Response of Arch Dams,” Bureau of Reclamation, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Griffith, A. A., The Phenomena of Rupture and Flow in Solids, Phil. Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Broek, David, Elementary Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Sijthoff and Noordhoff, The Netherlands, 1978.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Wittmann, F. H., Fracture Mechanics of Concrete, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sauma, V. E., Azari, M. L. and Boggs, H. L., “Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Gravity Dams,” University of Colorado-Boulder/USBR, Oct. 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kuo, J. S.-H., “Joint-Opening Nonlinear Mechanism: Interface Smeared Crack Model,” Earthquake Engineering Research Center, EERC 82/10, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fok, K., and Chopra, A. K., “Hydrodynamic and Foundation Flexibility Effects in Earthquake Response of Arch Dams,” ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 112, No. 18, Aug. 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Porter, C. S., and Chopra, A. K., “Hydrodynamic Effects in Dynamic Response of Simple Arch Dams,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 10, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Porter, C. S., and Chopra, A. K., “Dynamic Analyses of Simple Arch Dams Including Hydrodynamic Interaction,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 9, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Fok, K., and Chopra, A. K., “Earthquake Analyses of Arch Dams Including Dam-Water Interaction, Reservoir Boundary Absorption and Foundation Flexibility,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 14, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Niwa, A., and Clough, R. W. “Shaking Table Research on Concrete Dam Models,” Earthquake Engineering Research Center, EERC 80/ 05, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lewis, R. W., Numerical Methods in Coupled Systems, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., London, 1984.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Dungar, R., “Aseismic Design Considerations for a Large Arch Dam,” Dams and Earthquakes, TTL, London, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hall, J. F., and Dowling, M. J., “Response of Jointed Arches to Earthquake Excitation,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 13, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Niwa, A., and Clough, R. W., “Non-linear Seismic Response of Arch Dams,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 10, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hatano, T., “Aseismic Design Criteria for Arch Dams in Japan,” Ninth International Congress on Large Dams, Istanbul, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lauletta, E., “Dynamic Features of a Recent Italian Arch Dam,” Eighth International Congress on Large Dams, Edinburgh, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Bathe, K. J., Wilson, E. L., and Peterson, F. E., “SAPIV, a Structural Analysis Program for Static and Dynamic Response of Linear Systems,” College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, Report EERC 73-11, revised Apr. 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  45. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, “Safety Evaluation of Existing Dams,” Denver, CO, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  46. “Désordres Graves Constatés Sur Des Barrages Français,” ICOLD, Transactions of International Congress on Large Dams, New Delhi, India, Vol. II, p. 557, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Jansen, R. B., “Behavior and Deterioration of Dams in California,” ICOLD, Transactions, Q.34, R.25, Ninth Congress on Large Dams, Istanbul, Turkey, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Copen, M. D., and Lindholm, E. A., “Replacing East Canyon Dam Without Interrupting Operations,” ASCE Water Resources Conference, Denver, CO, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sundquist, D. C, and Kollgaard, E. B., “Design and Construction of Ross Dam in Successive Stages,” International Congress on Large Dams, New Delhi, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Bowles, D. S., Anderson, L. R., and Canfield, R. V., “A Systems Approach to Risk Analysis for an Earth Dam,” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Risk and Reliability in Water Resources, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 1978, 13 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Howell, J. C, Anderson, L. R., Bowles, D. S., and Canfield, R. V., “A Framework for Risk Analysis of Earth Dams,” Report submitted to Water and Power Resources Service (U.S. Bureau of Reclamation), Engineering and Research Center, Denver, CO, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Pate-Cornell, M. E., and Togaras, G., “Risk Costs for New Dams: Economic Analysis and Effects of Monitoring,” Water Resources Research, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 5–14, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. McCann, M. W., Franzini, J. B., Kavazanjian, E., and Shah, H. C, “Preliminary Safety Evaluation of Existing Dams,” Report to Federal Emergency Management Agency, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  54. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, “Guidelines to Decision Analysis,” ACER Technical Memorandum No. 7, Denver, CO, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Bowles, D. S., “A Comparison of Methods for Risk Assessment of Dams,” in Duckstein, L., and Plate, E. (eds.), Proceedings of Engineering Reliability and Risk in Water Resources, Nijhoff, M. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  56. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, “Design Criteria for Concrete Arch and Gravity Dams,” Engineering Monograph No. 19, Denver, CO, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Noetzli, F. A., “Improved Type of Multiple-Arch Dam,” Transactions, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 87, pp. 342–369, 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Zienkiewicz, O. C, and Nath, B., “Earthquake Hydrodynamic Pressures on Arch Dams—An Electric Analogue Solution,” Proceedings Inst, of Civil Engineers, London, Vol. 25, June 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Hatano, T., and Watanabe, H., “Fatigue Failure of Concrete Under Periodic Compressive Load,” Central Research Institute of Electric Power, Technical Report No. 70002, Tokyo, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Rouse, G. C, “Response of Concrete and Earth Dams to Ground Vibrations,” AEC Technical Symposium on Safety, Washington, DC, November 7, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data, “Guidelines for Determining Flood Flow Frequency,” Bulletin No. 17B of the Hydrology Subcommittee, U.S. Department of the Interior, Reston, Virginia, March 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Richter, CF., Elementary Seismology, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  63. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, “Application of Statistical Data from Dam Failures and Accidents to Risk Based Decision Analysis on Existing Dams,” USBR Internal Report, Denver, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Hatem, G. A., “Development of a Data Base on Dam Failures in the United States: Preliminary Results,” Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, December 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  65. U.S. Committee on Large Dams, A Reclamation Project: The Changing Times, Eighth Annual USCOLD Lecture, Phoenix, AZ, January 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Robert B. Jansen (Consulting Civil Engineer)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Van Nostrand Reinhold

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boggs, H.L., Tarbox, G.S., Jansen, R.B. (1988). Arch Dam Design and Analysis. In: Jansen, R.B. (eds) Advanced Dam Engineering for Design, Construction, and Rehabilitation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0857-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0857-7_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8205-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0857-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics