Applications of the Optical Phase Operator

  • S. M. Barnett
  • D. T. Pegg
  • J. A. Vaccaro
Conference paper


Quantum optics has progressed a long way in the last sixty years and much is now understood about coherence. Nevertheless, the description of the quantum nature of optical phase has been a longstanding problem. Classically, phase is a useful and easily-understood concept, and it might be expected that the classical phase observable should, according to the usual quantization procedures, correspond to an Hermitian phase operator ϕ. Indeed, the existence of this operator was indeed originally postulated by Dirac,1 but problems associated with finding such an operator have led to the present wide-spread belief that no such operator exists.2 Attempts to construct a phase operator have involved the use of an infinite dimensional state space and a polar decomposition of the annihilation operator. This procedure does not provide a unique operator. Specifically, the action of exp () on the vacuum is not determined. The usual ad hoc assumption is to set exp () ∣ 0 > = 0. This removes the indeterminacy but destroys the unitarity of exp (), along with the possibility of extracting an Hermitian operator from the exponential.


Coherent State Wigner Function Photon Number Phase Operator Hermitian Operator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    P.A.M.Dirac,Proc.R.Soc.Lond.A114, 243 (1927).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L.Susskind and J.Glogower,Physics 1,49(1964);Google Scholar
  3. P.Carruthers and M.M.Nieto,Rev.Mod.Phys.40,411(1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    T.S.Santhanam and K.B.Sinha,Aust.J.Phys.31,233(1978).Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    Pegg,D.T. and Barnett,S.M.,Europhys.Lett 6,483(1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 5.
    Barnett,S.M. and Pegg, D. T., J.Mod.Opt 36, 7 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 6.
    Pegg,D.T. and Barnett, S.M., Phys. Rev. A39, 1665 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 7.
    Serber,R. and Townes,C.H.,Quantum Electronics (New York, Columbia University Press,1960).p.233.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    R.Loudon and P.L.Knight,J.Mod.Opt.34,709(1987).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 9.
    Vaccaro, J.A. and Pegg,D.T.,Opt.Commun.70, 529 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 10.
    Barnett,S.M. and Pegg,D. T., J.Phys.A19, 3849 (1986).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 11.
    Milburn,G. J., J. Phys.A17, 737 (1984).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 12.
    Barnett,S.M. and Pegg,D.T.,(to be published).Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    Barnett,S.M.,S.Stenholm and Pegg,D.T.,Opt.Commun. (submitted)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. M. Barnett
    • 1
  • D. T. Pegg
    • 2
  • J. A. Vaccaro
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Engineering ScienceUniversity of OxfordOxfordEngland
  2. 2.School of ScienceGriffith UniversityNathanAustralia

Personalised recommendations