Any review of likely avenues of development in a subject must, first of all, put into some kind of context the starting point for that review. Hence an attempt is made to illustrate the process through which development takes place, and the significant events which have occurred over the past ten years which have led to where we are now. Three distinctions are made as a way of structuring the review, both in terms of examining past events and of addressing future directions. A simple model of the inquiry process is used to lead to these distinctions.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Atkinson, C. J., 1984, “Metaphor and Systemic Praxis”, Ph.D. Dissertation,Google Scholar
- University of Lancaster. Checkland, P. B., 1984, “Systems Thinking, Systems Practice”, Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
- Checkland, P. B., 1986, The politics of practice, paper to “International Roundtable: The Art and Science of Systems Practice”, IIASA (Nov. )Google Scholar
- Wilson, B., 1984, “Systems: Concepts, Methodologies and Applications”, Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
- Wilson, B., 1987, Information requirements analysis: a systems approach, in: “Proc. Anniversary Meeting of Share European Association”, Edinburgh.Google Scholar