Correlation of Ultrasonic Imaging and Destructive Analyses of Low Energy Impact Events
Some of the most critical flaws encountered during the service life of a composite component can result from impact damage due to foreign objects (FOD). Impact damage can produce significant degradation of the material’s structural integrity. Destructive sectioning  or de-plying [2,3] of impact damaged laminates has proven that damage is manifested in the form of interlaminar delaminations, each of different size, shape and ply interface orientation through the thickness. Unfortunately, the extent of the delamination damage, especially at low level impact sites, may not be visually identified from surface features. The seriousness of this problem has led to much work in both the nondestructive evaluation and mechanics communities to characterize and assess the effects of such damage.
KeywordsGraphite Pyrolysis Photography
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.E. G. Guynn and T. K. O’Brien, “The Influence of Lay-up and Thickness on Composite Impact Damage and Compression Strength”, AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS 26th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference (Part I), p. 187–196, April, 1985.Google Scholar
- 3.S. M. Freeman, “Correlation of X-Ray Radiograph Images with Actual Damage in Graphite/Epoxy Composites by the Deply Technique”, Composites in Manufacturing 3 Conference, Vol. EM84–101, pp. 1–13, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, Michigan, 1984.Google Scholar
- 4.B. T. Smith, J. S. Heyman, J. G. Moore, S. J. Cucura, and S. M. Freeman, “Correlation of the Deply Technique with the Ultrasonic Imaging of Impact Damage in Graphite/Epoxy Composites”, Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 5B, Donald O. Thompson and Dale E. Chimenti, (eds.), pp. 1239–1244, Plenum Press, New York, 1986.Google Scholar
- 5.P. Sjoblom, SAMPE International Symposium, 32, p. 529, 1987.Google Scholar
- 6.C. F. Buynak, T. J. Moran, and S. L. Donaldson, “Characterization of Impact Damage in Composites”, SAMPE Journal, March/April 1988, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 35–39.Google Scholar