Skip to main content

Abstract

This work is motivated by the need for realistic ultrasonic probability of detection (POD) models in nondestructive evaluation (NDE). Past POD models have utilized flaw farfield scattering amplitudes along with other system parameters to predict the expected signal in postulated measurement geometries [1]. However, numerical evaluations of scattering amplitudes have generally been restricted to idealized flaw shapes and, to our knowledge, no scheme to calculate scattering amplitudes of arbitrary shape has ever been implemented in 3D. Volumetric shapes with an axis of symmetry have been examined with T-matrix and MOOT [2,3] but the axisyrametric limitation precludes a large portion of all expected flaw shapes. Furthermore, a quasi-plane wave assumption is often made. This assumption can become inappropriate for critical flaw sizes on the order of the beam size. A truly general POD model needs to have these assumptions removed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. T. A. Gray and R. B. Thompson, in Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE. edited by D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti (Plenum Press, New York, 1986), Vol. 5A, pp. 911–918

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. K. Varadan and V. V. Varadan, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 65(4), 1979, pp. 896–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. L. Opsal and W. M. Visscher, J. Appl. Phvs. 58(3), 1985, pp. 1102–1115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. F. J. Rizzo, D. J. Shippy and M. Rezayat, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 21, 1985, pp. 115–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Rezayat, F. J. Rizzo, and D. J. Shippy, Comp. Meth. Appi. Mech. Vol. 55, 1986, pp. 173–179

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. B. Thompson and E. F. Lopes, in Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE. edited by D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti (Plenum Press, New York, 1986), Vol. 5A, pp. 117–125

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. R. Tittman, in Proceedings of the ARPA/AFML Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE. AFML-TR-77–44, 1977, pp. 173–179

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. D. Manolis, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 19, 1983, pp. 73–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B. A. Auld, Wave Motion 1, 1979, pp. 3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schafbuch, P.J., Thompson, R.B., Rizzo, F.J., Rudolphi, T.J. (1989). Elastic Wave Scattering by Arbitrarily Shaped Voids. In: Thompson, D.O., Chimenti, D.E. (eds) Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0817-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0817-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8097-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0817-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics