Microgenesis

Historical Review and Current Studies
  • Robert E. Hanlon
  • Jason W. Brown
Part of the Critical Issues in Neuropsychology book series (CINP)

Abstract

Currently, there is renewed interest in process-oriented approaches to the study of mental phenomena. In this chapter we review one of the more established approaches of this type, that of microgenesis. Originating from assumptions on the structural development of thought by the early experimental psychologists of Würzburg and Leipzig, the fundamental principles of microgenesis have been progressively elaborated.

Keywords

Depression Europe Dementia Schizophrenia Aphasia 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ach, N. (1905). Über die Willenstatigheit unddas Denken. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, J. W. (1972). Aphasia, apraxia and agnosia: Clinicaland theoretical aspects. Springfield, IL: Thomas.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, J. W. (1977). Mind, brain, and consciousness. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, J. W. (1988a). The lifeof the mind: Selected papers. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, J. W. (1988b). Classics in neuropsychology: Selected papers on agnosia and apraxia. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Cegalis, J. A. (1973). Prism distortion and accommodtive change. Perception and Psycho-physics, 13, 494–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cegalis, J. A. (1984). On the role of conflict in microgenesis. In W. Froehlich, G. Smith, J. Draguns, & U. Hentschel (Eds.), Psychological processes in cognition and personality. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  8. Cegalis, J. A., & Leen, D. (1977). Individual differences in responses to induced perceptual conflict. Perceptual andMotor Skills, 44, 991–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cegalis, J. A., & Young, R. (1974). The effect of inversion-induced conflict on field-dependence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83, 373–379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conrad, K. (1947). Über den Begriff der Vorgestalt und seine Bedeutung für die Hirnpathologie. Nervenarzt, 18, 289–293.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. De Bleser, R. (1987). From agrammatism to paragrammatism: German aphasiological traditions and grammatical disturbances. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 4, 187–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Draguns, J. (1967). Affective meaning of reduced stimulus input: A study by means of the semantic differential. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 21, 231–241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Draguns, J. (1984). Microgenesis by any other name In W. Froehlich, G. Smith, J. Draguns, & U. Hentschel (Eds.), Psychological processes in cognition and personality. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  14. Draguns, J., & Multari, G. (1961). Recognition of perceptually ambiguous stimuli in grade school children. ChildDevelopment, 32, 541–550.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Evans, P. (1972). Henri Ey’s concepts of the organization of consciousness and its disorganization: An extension of Jacksonian theory. Brain, 95, 413–440.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ey, H. (1950–1954). Etudes psychiatriques (Vols. 1–3). Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar
  17. Fisher, C. (1960). Introduction: Preconscious stimulation in dreams, associations, and images. Psychological Issues, 2, 1–40.Google Scholar
  18. Flavell, J. H. (1956). Abstract thinking and social behavior in schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 52, 208–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flavell, J. H., & Draguns, J. (1957). A microgenetic approach to perception and thought. Psychological Bulletin, 54, 197–217.Google Scholar
  20. Froehlich, W. D. (1978). Stress, anxiety, and the control of attention: A psychophysiological approach. In C. D. Spielberger & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Stress andanxiety (Vol. 5 ). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  21. Froehlich, W. D. (1984). Microgenesis as a functional approach to information processing through search. In W. Froehlich, G. Smith, J. Draguns, & U. Hentschel (Eds.), Psychological processes incognition and personality. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  22. Humphrey, G. (1963). Thinking: An introduction to its experimentalpsychology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Johanson, A. M., Risberg, J., Silfverskiold, P., & Smith, G. (1986). Regional changes in cerebral blood flow during increased anxiety in patients with anxiety neurosis. In U. Hentschel, G. Smith, & J. G. Draguns (Eds.), The roots of perception. Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland.Google Scholar
  24. Jung, C. G. (1919). Studies in word association (M. D. Eder, Trans.). New York: Moffat.Google Scholar
  25. Kragh, U. (1955). The actual-genetic modelof perception-personality. Lund: Gleerup Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
  26. Kragh, U. (1969). DMT-defense mechanism test. Stockholm: Skandinaviska Testforlaget.Google Scholar
  27. Kragh, U., & Smith, G. J. W. (Eds.). (1970). Percept-genetic analysis. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
  28. Marbe, K. (1901). Experimentell-psychologische Untersuchungenüber das Urteil. Leipzig: EngelmannGoogle Scholar
  29. Mayer, A., & Orth, J. (1901). Zeitschrift für Psychologie undPhysiologie der Sinnesorgan, 26.Google Scholar
  30. Messer, A. (1906). Archives Gesamte Psychologie, 8, 1–224.Google Scholar
  31. Pick, A. (1913). Die agrammatischen Sprachstorungen. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Pick, A. (1931). Aphasie. In A. Bethe & G. von Bergmann (Eds.), Handbuch der normalen und pathologischen Physiologie (Vol. 15 ). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Pötzl, O. (1960). The relationship between experimentally induced dream images and indirect vision. Psychological Issues, 2, 41–120.Google Scholar
  34. Rimoldi, H. J. A. (1960). Problem solving as a process. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rimoldi, H. J. A. (1967). Thinking and language. Archives of General Psychiatry, 17, 568–576.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sander, F. (1928). Experimentelle Ergebnisse der Gestaltpsychologie. In E. Becher (Ed.), 10 Kongres bericht experimentelle Psychologie. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
  37. Schilder, P. (1951). On the development of thoughts. In D. Rapaport (Ed.), Organization and pathology of thought. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Schilder, P. (1953). Medical psychology. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  39. Smith, G. J. W. (1956). Review of U. Kragh’s “The actual-genetic model of perception-personality.” Theoria, 22, 61–69.Google Scholar
  40. Smith, G. J. W. (1984). Stabilization and automatization of perceptual activity over time. In W. Froelich, G. Smith, J. Draguns, & U. Hentschel (Eds.), Psychological processes in cognition and personality. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  41. Smith, G. J. W., & Danielsson, A. (1982). Anxiety and defensive strategies in childhood and adolescence. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  42. Smith, G. J. W., Fries, I., Andersson, A. L., & Reid, J. (1971). Diagnostic exploitation of visual after-effect measures in a moderately depressive patient group. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 12, 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith, G. J. W., & Kragh, U. (1967). A serial afterimage experiment in clinical diagnostics. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 8, 52–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Werner, H. (1948). Comparative psychology of mental development ( 2nd ed. ). New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  45. Werner, H. (1956). Microgenesis and aphasia. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 52, 347–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Westerlundh, B. (1976). Aggression, anxiety and defense. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
  47. Westerlundh, B. (1984). Perceptgenesis and the experimental study of conflict and defense. In W. Froehlich, G. Smith, J. Draguns, & U. Hentschel (Eds.), Psychological processes in cognition and personality. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert E. Hanlon
    • 1
  • Jason W. Brown
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCity College of the City University of New YorkNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of NeurologyNew York University Medical CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations