Acoustic Microscope Study of a Titanium Diffusion Bond

  • R. D. Weglein
Part of the Acoustical Imaging book series (ACIM, volume 17)

Abstract

The need for more reliable and cost-effective nondestructive inspection methods is never ending. In particular, the ability to locate and possibly to quantify the microscopic strength-determining imperfections in diffusion bonds suggests that ultra-high frequency (UHF) ultrasonic techniques might render an appropriate tool. However, the investigation of diagnostic techniques of diffusion bonds via the acoustic microscope with micron dimensional resolution capability has been surprizingly sparse1. In addition, the metrology mode2 of this versatile inspection tool has to date not been invoked in this context to ascertain the elastic properties in the immediate vicinity of the joined surfaces of a diffusion bond.

Keywords

Titanium Microwave Anisotropy Attenuation Hexagonal 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1).
    B. Derby, G.A.D. Briggs and E. R. Wallach, “Non-destructive testing and acoustic microscopy of diffusion bonds”, J. Materials Science, vol. 18, 1983.Google Scholar
  2. 2).
    R. D. Weglein, “Acoustic Micro-Metrology”, IEEE Trans, on Sonics and Ultrasonics, vol. SU-32, No. 2, pp. 225–234, March, 1985.Google Scholar
  3. kindly made available through the courtesy of the Olympus Corporation of America.Google Scholar
  4. 4).
    N. Hsu and H. Conrad, “Ultrasonic Wave Velocity Measurements on Titanium-Oxygen alloys”, Scripta Metallurgica, vol. 5, pp. 905–908, Pergamon Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  5. 5).
    See, for example, O.P. Arora, et al, “Proceedings of the 1 st workshop on nondestructive evaluation (NDE) of titanium alloys”, Report No. DTNSRDC-SME-CR-14–82, 12 contributions, Naval Research Laboratory, Wash., DC 20375, June I982.Google Scholar
  6. 6).
    S. R. Buxbaum and R. E. Green, Jr., “Ultrasonic Characterization of Oxygen Contaminated Titanium 6211 Plate”, Proc. Ultrasonics International '83, pp.91–96, 1983.Google Scholar
  7. 7).
    E. S. Bumps, H. D. Kessler, and M. Hansen, Trans. ASM, vol. 45, pp. 1008–1028, 1953.Google Scholar
  8. 8).
    M. T. Wauk II, “Attenuation in microwave acoustic transducers and resonators”, PhD Thesis, Stanford University, July 1969.Google Scholar
  9. 9).
    B. A. Auld, ACOUSTIC FIELDS AND WAVES IN SOLIDS, vol. 1, App. 2, John Wiley & Sons, N.Y. 1973.Google Scholar
  10. 10).
    Special Issue on Acoustic Microscopy — IEEE Trans. Sonics & Ultrasonics, vol. SU-32, No. 2, March 1985.Google Scholar
  11. 11).
    R. D. Weglein and A. K. Mai, “Toward quantitative imaging with the acoustic microscope”, ACOUSTICAL IMAGING, eds. A. J. Berkout, J. Ridder and L. F. van der Wal, pp. 387–396, vol. 14, 1985, Plenum Press, N.Y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12).
    W. Parmon and H. L. Bertoni, “Ray interpretation of the material signature in the acoustic microscope”, Elect. Lett., vol. 15, No. 21, pp. 684–686, Oct. I979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. S. R. Buxbaum and R. E. Green, Jr., “Ti-Alloy Acoustic Data”, pp.15–36, in reference 5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. D. Weglein
    • 1
  1. 1.Los AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations