Abstract
In the reflection acoustic microscope {1}, the large impedance mismatch at the coupler/object interface can lead to a large, but relatively constant, signal. This is because, despite the large reflectivity at this interface, in some specimens, the variations in object impedance and, therefore, in the reflectivity may be quite small. For example, it has been shown that the grain structure in certain solids results in only a few percent change in reflectivity {2}. In such situations, the large background signal can overshadow the signal which arises from the reflectivity variations, leading to a poor image contrast. These issues become more serious in gas medium {3} and cryogenic {4} systems to the extent that, in these forms of microscopy, a major part of the image contrast is purely due to topography. It is clear that, to attain the largest image contrast, only the changes in the signal have to be displayed. Also, it is clear that, ideally, one requires a system which yields no signal for a perfect reflector. In such a system — a differential amplitude microscope — the difference in the amplitudes from adjacent points of the sample constitute the imaging signal.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C. F. Quate, A. Atlar and H. K. Wickramasinghe (1979), “Acoustic Microscopy with Mechanical Scanning — A Review”, Proc. of IEEE, 67(8), pp 1092–1113.
Q. R. Yin, D. Ilett and G. A. D. Briggs (1982), “Acoustic Microscopy of Ferroelectric Ceramics”, Journal of Materials Science, 17, pp 2449–2452.
B. Hadimioglu and J. S. Foster (1984), “Recent Developments in Superfluid Helium Acoustic Microscopy”, Proc. of IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 84CH2112–1, vol 2, pp 593–597.
F. Faridian (1985), “Gas Medium Acoustic Microscopy at 160 MHz”, Proc. of IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 85CH2209–5, vol 2, pp 759–762.
M. Nikoonahad (1987), “Differential Phase Contrast Acoustic Microscopy Using Tilted Transducers”, Elect. Lett., 23, pp 489–490.
M. Nikoonahad (1987), “New Techniques in Differential Phase Contrast Scanning Acoustic Microscopy”, Acoustical Imaging, vol 16, Plenum, in press.
M. Nikoonahad (1987), “Differential Amplitude Contrast in Acoustic Microscopy”, Appl. Phys. Lett., 51(21), pp 1687–1689.
M. Nikoonahad and F. Li (1988), “High Resolution Ultrasound Traverse Flow Measurement”, Elect. Lett., 24(4), pp 205–207.
See, for example, J. W. Goodman, (1968), Introduction to Fourier Optics, McGraw-Hill, San Francisco.
M. Nikoonahad and E. A. Ash, (1982), “Ultrasonic Focussing in Absorptive Fluids”, Acoustical Imaging, vol 12, pp 47–60.
I. R. Smith and H. K. Wickramasinghe (1982), “Dichromatic Differential Phase Contrast Microscopy”, IEEE Trans. Sonics and Ultrasonics, SU 29(6), pp 321–326.
K. K. Liang, S. D. Bennett, B. T. Khuri-Yakub and G. S. Kino (1985), “Precise Phase Measurements with the Acoustic Microscope”, IEEE Trans. Sonics and Ultrasonics, SU 32(2), pp 266–273.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nikoonahad, M., Sivers, E.A. (1989). Dual-Beam Differential Amplitude Contrast Scanning Acoustic Microscopy. In: Shimizu, H., Chubachi, N., Kushibiki, Ji. (eds) Acoustical Imaging. Acoustical Imaging, vol 17. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0791-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0791-4_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8084-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0791-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive