Abstract
During the past 25 years, the discipline of OR has become increasingly self-conscious and self-critical of its foundations (Dando and Bennett,1981: Jackson and Keys, 1987). Whereas problems were thought to exist out there, in the world, a growing number of OR academics and practitioners now believe that traditional, ’hard’ OR is itself as much a source of problems as it is a means of resolving them. Specifically, it has been suggested that these problems arise from an incapacity to appreciate the reflexive, socially constructed nature of problem situations. As faith in the assumptions of ’hard’ OR has been shaken, alternative, ’softer1 methodologies have emerged to challenge its supremacy. In turn, these efforts to break out of the traditional mould of OR have stimulated a critical evaluation of the adequacy of their challenge.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ackoff R.L., 1974, “Redesigning the Future”, John Wiley, New York.
Ackoff R.L., 1979a, The Future of Operaitonal Research is Past, Jnl.Op.Res. Soc., 30: 93.
Ackoff R.L., 1979b, Resurrecting the Future of Operational Research, Jnl.Op.Res.Soc., 30: 189.
Adorno T.W., Alpert H., Dahrendorf R., Habermas J., Pilot H. and Popper K.R., 1976, “The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology”, Heinemann, London.
Barnes B., 1974, “Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory”, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Bernstein R.J., 1976, “The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory”, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Burrell G., 1983, “;Systems Thinking, Systems Practice”;: a review, Jnl.Appl.Syst.Anal., 10:121.
Burrell G. and Morgan G., 1979, “Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis”, Heinemann, London.
Checkland P.B., 1981, “Systems Thinking, Systems Practice”, John Wiley, London.
Checkland P.B., 1982, Soft Systems Methodology as process: a reply to M.C.Jackson, Jnl.Appl.Syst.Anal., 9:37.
Checkland P.B., 1983a, OR and the systems movement: mappings and conflicts, Jnl.Op.Res.Soc., 34: 661.
Checkland P.B., 1983b, “Systems Thinking, Systems Practice”: a response to Burrell’s review, Jnl.Appl.Syst.Anal., 10:127.
Checkland P.B., 1985, From optimising to learning: a development of systems thinking for the 1990s, Jnl.Op.Res.Soc., 36: 757.
Checkland P.B., 1988, Soft systems methodology: an overview, Jnl.Appl.Syst.Anal., 15: 27.
Churchman C.W., 1979a, “The Systems Approach”, Dell, New York.
Churchman C.W., 1979b, “The Systems Approach and its Enemies”, Basic Books, New York.
Dando M.R. and Bennett P.G., 1981, A Kuhnian crisis in management science? Jnl.Op.Res.Soc., 32: 91.
Dando M.R. and Sharp R.G., 1978, Operational Research in the UK in 1977: the causes and consequences of a myth, Jnl.Op.Res.Soc., 29: 939.
Giddens A., 1977, Positivism and its critics, in: “Studies in Social and Political Theory”, A. Giddens, Hutchinson, London.
Giddens A., 1979, “Central Problems in Social Theory”, Macmillan, London.
Habermas J., 1970a, On systematically distorted communication, Inquiry, 13: 205.
Habermas J., 1970b, Towards a theory of communicative competence, Inquiry, 13: 360.
Habermas J., 1972, “Knowledge and Human Interests”, Heinemann, London.
Habermas J., 1976, The analytical theory of science and dialectics, and, A positivistically bisected rationalism, in: Adorno T.W. et al. “The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology”, Heinemann, London.
Held D., 1980, “Introduction to Critical Theory: Horkheimer to Habermas”, Hutchinson, London.
Jackson M.C., 1982, The nature of ’soft’ systems thinking: the work of Churchman, Ackoff and Checkland, Jnl.App.Syst.Anal., 9: 17.
Jackson M.C., 1983, The nature of ’soft’ systems thinking: comment on the three replies, Jnl.Appl.Syst.Anal., 10: 109.
Jackson M.C. and Keys P. (eds.), 1987, “New Directions in Management Science”, Gower, Aldershot.
Johnson T., Dandeker C. and Ashworth C., 1984, “The Structure of Social Theory”, Macmillan, London.
Keat R. and Urry J., 1977, “Social Theory as Science”, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Lukes S., 1974, “Power: a Radical View”, Macmillan, London.
McCarthy T., 1978, “The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas”, Hutchinson, London.
Miller P., 1987, “Power and Domination”, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Mingers J.C., 1980, Towards an appropriate social theory for applied systems thinking: critical theory and soft systems methodology, Jnl.Appl.Syst.Anal., 7:41.
Mingers J.C., 1984, Subjectivism and soft systems methodology - a critique, Jnl.Appl.Syst.Anal., 11:85.
Popper K.R., 1976, Reason or revolution, in: Adorno T.W. et al., “The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology”, Heinemann, London.
Roderick R., 1986, “Habermas and the Foundations of Critical Theory”, Macmillan, London.
Tinker T. and Lowe T., 1982, The management science of the management sciences, Hum.Reln., 35:331.
Tinker T. and Lowe T., 1984, One-dimensional management science: the making of a technocratic consciousness, Interfaces, 14(2):40.
Ulrich W., 1983, “Critical Heuristics of Social Planning”, Haupt, Bern.
Ulrich W., 1986, Critical heuristics of social systems design, Working Paper 10, Dept. of Management Systems and Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Willmott, H. (1989). Or as a Problem Situation: From Soft Systems Methodology to Critical Science. In: Jackson, M.C., Keys, P., Cropper, S.A. (eds) Operational Research and the Social Sciences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0789-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0789-1_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8083-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0789-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive