Methodologies for Messes
In the introductory article to this section ‘Management of Messes’ I made my view quite clear, that complementarity between approaches is of paramount concern, I noted that methodology choice could be guided according to situational context and some understanding about the assumptions on social reality inherent in methodologies (theoretical underpinnings and so on…). In this paper the concern is with messy situations (where context is messy), and so I shall first discuss this in terms of complexity as understood through a number of paradigmatic interpretations. Once the notions of ’mess’ and ‘complexity’ have been illuminated I shall move on to consider the availability of theories and methodologies for dealing with such ‘sets’of circumstances.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Ackoff, R.L., (1974). Redesigning the FutureNew York: J Wiley and SonsGoogle Scholar
- Ackoff, R.L., (1979). The future of Operational Research is past. J Opl Res Soc,30 (2), pp 93–104.Google Scholar
- Ackoff, R.L., (1981). Creating the Corporate Future. New York: J Wiley and SonsGoogle Scholar
- Checkland,P.B., (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester: J Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
- DeVries, R.P. and Hezerwijk, R.Van, (1978). Systems Theory and the philosophy of Science. Annals Syst Res,7, pp. 91–123.Google Scholar
- Fay, B., (1975). Social Theory and Political PracticeLondon: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
- Flood, R.L., (1989). Liberating Systems Theory: Towards Critical Systems Thinking. Human Relations,(forthcoming)Google Scholar
- Jackson, M.C., and Keys, P., (1984). Towards a system of systems methodologies. J Opl Res Soc, 35 (6), pp. 473–486.Google Scholar
- Jung, C.G., (1926). Psychological Types. New York: Harcourt and Brace.Google Scholar