Skip to main content

Institutions and Intelligent Systems

  • Chapter
  • 17 Accesses

Abstract

Within the structural-functionalist tradition, (comparatively formal) organizations like trade-unions or corporations, and institutions such as the Market, the Family etc. have been defined as “purposeful systems” (Barnard, 1938).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agre, P.E., and Chapman, D., 1987, Pengi: An implementation of a theory of activity, Sixth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence Proc., Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, 1: 269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. and Colomy, P., 1985, Towards neofunctionalism: Eisenstadt’s change theory and symbolic interactionism, Sociologic.Th., 2: 11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J.C., and Giesen, B., 1987, From reduction to linkage: The long view of the micro-macro debate, in: “The Micro-Macro Link,” J.C. Alexander, B. Giesen, R. Muench and N.J. Smelser, eds., The California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C. I., 1938, “The Functions of the Executive,” Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckely, W., 1967, “Sociology and Moderns Systems Theory,” Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caste I., franchi, C., 1985, “Sulle Tracce della Mente,” Technical Report Istituto di Psicologia del CNR, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, L., 1985, “In Defence of Organization Theory. A Reply to the Critics,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M., 1986, “How Institutions Think,” Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H.R. and Varela F.J, 1980, “Autopoiesis and Cognition. The Realization of the Living,” Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schotter, A., 1981, “The Economic Theory of Social Institutions,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steels, L., 1988, “A Reaction-Diffusion Model of Computation,” VUB A.I. Lab. Memo, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman-Margalit, E., 1977, “The Emergence of Norms,” Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Conte, R. (1989). Institutions and Intelligent Systems. In: Jackson, M.C., Keys, P., Cropper, S.A. (eds) Operational Research and the Social Sciences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0789-1_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0789-1_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8083-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0789-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics