Abstract
A quarter century after the first Cambridge Conference on Operational Research and the Social Sciences, i feel that it is high time to summarize the mutual contribution between these two areas. In this paper OR are the quantitative sciences and tools, while SS (the Social Sciences) represents the qualitative approach or what we would like to refer to as real life.
The area of SS relevant to our theme is that of the actual dynamics of organization and management, represented by the so-called Total Organizational System (TOS) described in the first part of the paper. This part includes a discussion of why the TOS cannot benefit from any contributions of OR. Obviously the SS do derive from the quantitative sciences statistical testing tools for verification of findings based on large numbers of data (or such statistical applications as quality control testing), as well as the obvious utilization of electronic data processing (EDP).
The second part of the paper considers the question why OR has, on the one hand, only contributed marginally to and could never match the SS and on the other hand, has developed and expanded over the last 25 years inspite of the halo of mathematical (and simplistic!) solutions. The relative ease with which mathematically oriented publications could be evaluated by scientists from different disciplines for the purpose of nominating, promoting, tenuring faculty members is discussed.
The last part of the paper presents a few examples of the harm done by OR to the healthy and prosperous development of SS. I subsequently describe the damage that OR in its wider sense has caused Israel, especially in the areas of management and public health
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ackoff, R. L., 1986, Management in Small Doses, John Wiley and Sons, N.Y.
Checkland, P., 1984, Rethinking a systems approach, in: Tomlinson and Kiss, 1984
Churchman, C.W ., 1967, Wicked problems, Management Science, 14:B-141.
Jackson, M.C., 1982, The nature of soft systems thinking: the work of Churchman, Ackoff and Checkland, Applied Syst. Anal., 9:17
Jackson, MC, 1987, Community operational research: purposes, theory and practice, Dragon, 2: 47.
Rosenhead, J., 1986a, Custom and Practice, JORS, 37: 335.
Rosenhead, J., 1986b, From the president (of the Operational Research Society), OR newsletter, Vol. 15, No. 9.
Tomlinson, R. and Kiss I., editors, 1984, “Rethinking the Process of Operational Research and Systems Analysis,” Pergamon Press, London.
Weinshall, T. D. and Raveh, Y. A., 1983, “Managing Growing Organizations,” John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Weinshall, T. (1989). The Total Organisation System (TOS) Why Operational Research and The Social Sciences Cannot Match. In: Jackson, M.C., Keys, P., Cropper, S.A. (eds) Operational Research and the Social Sciences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0789-1_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0789-1_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8083-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0789-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive