Skip to main content

Statutes in Common Law and Civil Law

Their Interpretation and Status

  • Chapter
Law and Semiotics

Abstract

Statutes are an important source of legal rules. This is of course true by definition for code-based legal systems, but it is also increasingly true for present day common law systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexy, R., (1978): Theorie der juristischen Argumentation, Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, L.E. and C. Rudy Engholm, 1980, The Need for Clear Structure in “Plain Language” Legal Drafting, 13 Journal of Law Reform, 3: 455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, S.J., 1985, An Introduction to Law and Legal Reasoning, Boston, Toronto: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabresi, G., 1982, Common Law for the Age of Statutes, Cambridge, Mass. and London, England: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J., 1979, “A Response to Statutory Obsolescence: The Nonprimacy of Statutes Act,” 4 Vermont LawReview 2:203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, G., 1974, The Death of Contract, Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, G., 1979, “Putting Senator Davies in Context,” 4 Vermont Law Review, 233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. and A. Sacks, 1958, The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of Law, Manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kottenhagen, R.J.P., 1986, Van precedent tot precedent, Gouda Quint B.V. Arnhem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R., 1983, “The Common Lawyer’s Philosophy of Legislation,” Rechtstheorie, 14:191, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot,.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polak, J.M. and Polak, M.V., 1986, “Faux Pas ou Pas de Deux? Recent Developments in the Relationship between the Legislature and the Judiciary in the Netherlands,” XXXIII Netherlands International Law Review1986, 371 - 411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholten, P., 1932, Algemeen Deel, W.E.J. Zwolle: Tjeenk Willink, (second edition: Zwolle, 1974 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, J., 1968, Legal System and Lawyer’s Reasoning, Sydney: Maitland Publications Pty. Ltd. (second edition )

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, J., 1985, Precedent and Law, Butterworth, Sydney etc.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J.J. and R.S. Summers, 1980, Handbook of the Law under the Universal Commercial Code, 2d ed., St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wróblewski, J., 1974, “The Concept and Function of Precedent in Statute-Law Systems,” Archivum luridicum Cracoviense, Vol. VII, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Henket, M. (1988). Statutes in Common Law and Civil Law. In: Kevelson, R. (eds) Law and Semiotics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0771-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0771-6_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8074-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0771-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics