Skip to main content

Immunological Aspects of Contact Hypersensitivity to Nickel and Chromium in Dental Alloys

  • Chapter
  • 137 Accesses

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NSSA,volume 171))

Abstract

Sensitization to nickel and to chromium is very common. Approximately 10% of the female population and a smaller, but increasing number of the male population is hypersensitive to nickel (1.). Chromium is known as the most important cause of occupational contact dermatitis in man, the frequency of which (11% in Europe) is still increasing with the increasing use of chromium containing products in our daily life (2,3.). Despite the high prevalence of nickel and chromium hypersensitivity in the population, cases due to dental treatment with nickel and chromium containing alloys are rare. Until now only a few cases of nickel and chromium hypersensitivity have been reported, but also for gold, palladium, copper, mercury and other metals (4–7). To better understand for pathogenetic and predictive reasons, the mechanism behind metal allergy, there is a need for various studies to explore the immunological aspects of this disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Menné, T. Borgan, O. and Green, A. (1982); Nickel allergy and hand dermatitis in a stratified sample of the Danish population. Acta Derm. (Stockh) 62: 35

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fregert, T. (1975); Occupational dermatitis in a 10 year material. Contact Dermatitis. 1:96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cronin, E. (1971); Contact dermatitis, XV Chromate dermatitis in men. Brit. J. Dermatology. 85: 95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fenton, A.H. Jeffrey, J.D. and Sound, P. (1978); Allergy to a partial denture casting. Dent. J. 44: 466.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fregert, T. Kollahder, M. and Poulsen, J. (1979); Allergic contact dermatitis from gold dentures. Contact Dermatitis 5: 63.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Duxburry, A.J. Ead, R.D. McMurrough, S. and Watts, D.C. (1982); Allergy to mercury in dental amalgam. Br. Dent. J. 152:47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Loon, L.A.J. van. Nieboer, C. and Ketel, W.G. van. (1982); A case of local and general complaints caused by palladium hypersensitivity. Ned. Tijdschr. Tandheelk. 89: 50.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Coombs, R.R.A. and Gell, P.G.H. (1975) Classification of allergic reactions responsible for clinical hypersensitivity and disease. In Gell, Coombs and Lachman, Clinical aspects of immunology. 3rd ed, pp761.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Roit, I. Brostoff, J and Male, D. (1985); Immunology. Gowers Medical Publishers. London. New York. ISBN 0-906923-35-2.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Polak, L. (1980) Immunological aspects of contact sensitivity. Monographs in Allergy, Vol 15. ISBN. 3-8055-3050-1.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Asherson, G.L. Zembala, M. Perera, M.A.C.C. Mayhew, B and Thomas, W.R. (1977); Production of immunity and unresponsiveness in the mouse by feeding contact sensitizing agents and the role of suppressor cells in the Peyer’s patches, mesenteric lymphnodes and other lymphoid tissues. Cell. Immunol. 33:145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vreeburg, K.J.J. Groot, K. de. Blomberg, M von. and Scheper, R.J. (1984) Induction of immunological tolerance by oral administration of nickel and chromium. J. Dent. Res. 63: 124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vreeburg, K.J.J. Groot, K de and Scheper, R.J. (1986); Successful induction of allergic contact dermatitis to nickel and chromium in mice. (submitted for publication)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Burg, C.K.H. v.d. Bruynzeel, D.P. Vreeburg, K.J.J. Blomberg, B.M.E. von and Scheper, R.J. (1986); Hand eczema in hairdressers and nurses; a prospective study. I. Evaluation of atopy and nickel-hypersensitivity at the start of apprenticeship. Contact Dermatitis (Accepted for publication).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Möller, H. (1984); Attempts to induce contact allergy to nickel in the mouse. Contact Dermatitis. 10:65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tigelaar, E.R. Bergstresser, P.R. Lonsberry, L.M. Elmets, C. Wood, P.J. and Streilein, J.W. (1982); Oral ingestion of epicutaneously applied hapten in mice may unwittingly induce down-regulation of contact hypersensitivity. J. Immunol. 129:1898.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vreeburg, K.J.J., de Groot, K., v.d. Burg, C.K.H., Scheper, R.J. (1988). Immunological Aspects of Contact Hypersensitivity to Nickel and Chromium in Dental Alloys. In: Hildebrand, H.F., Champy, M. (eds) Biocompatibility of Co-Cr-Ni Alloys. NATO ASI Series, vol 171. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0757-0_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0757-0_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8067-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0757-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics