Skip to main content

Pregnancy Rate and Pregnancy Outcome Associated with Laboratory Evaluation of Spermatozoa, Oocytes, and Pre-Embryos

  • Chapter
Book cover Advances in Assisted Reproductive Technologies

Abstract

There are very few non-invasive methods currendy available for determining the quality of gametes and pre-implantation embryos. Because sperm collection is easier than oocyte collection, and because the numbers of available sperm are so far in excess of available oocytes, the opportunity to examine large populations of sperm is possible within an in vitro fertilization setting. It follows that invasive testing may be performed on sperm without fear of compromising a given patient’s chances for establishing pregnancy. Unfortunately, embryologists must rely primarily on gross morphology and developmental rate in order to make comparable assessments of the oocyte and developing conceptus; both an unreliable and uninformative means, yet the only means possible when the desire is to reduce potential danger to the oocyte and pre-embryo. Despite these limitations, various associations may be noted between the factors of gross analysis and the ability to contribute to ongoing pregnancy. While these factors may differ between sperm and oocytes, the additive effect of each factor may build a base upon which to estimate the potential for success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L. J. Burkman, Experimental approaches to evaluation and enhancement of sperm function, in: “In Vitro Fertilization — Norfolk,” H.W. Jones Jr., G.S. Jones, G.D. Hodgen, and Z. Rosenwaks, eds., Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, Maryland, 201 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. A. Acosta, T. Kruger, R. J. Swanson, K. F. Simmons, S. Oehninger, L. L. Veeck, P. Hague, P. Pleban, M. Morshedi, S. Ackerman, Role of IVF in male infertility, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 541:297 (1988).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. T. F. Kruger, A. A. Acosta, K. F. Simmons, R. J. Swanson, J. F. Matta, L. L. Veeck, M. Morshedi, and S. Brugo, A new method of evaluating sperm morphology with predictive value for IVF, Urology, 30:248 (1987).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Oehninger, A. A. Acosta, T. Kruger, L. L. Veeck, J. Flood, and H. W. Jones Jr., Failure of fertilization in in vitro fertilization: The “occult” male factor, J. In Vitro Fert. Embryo Transfer, 5:181 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. T. C. Appleton, and S. B. Fishel, Morphology and x-ray microprobe analysis of spermatozoa from fertile and infertile men in in vitro fertilization, J. In Vitro Fert. Embryo Transfer, 1:188 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. R. H. Martin, Comparison of chromosomal abnormalities in hamster egg and human sperm pronuclei, Biol. Reprod., 31:819 (1984).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. S. McDowell, Preparation of spermatozoa for insemination in vitro, in: “In Vitro Fertilization- Norfolk,” H.W. Jones Jr., G.S. Jones, G.D. Hodgen, and Z. Rosenwaks, eds., Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, Maryland, 162 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. A. Acosta, C. F. Chillik, S. Brugo, S. Ackerman, R. J. Swanson, P. Pleban, J. Yuan, and D. Hague, In vitro fertilization and the male factor, Urology, 28:1 (1986).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. R. T. Scott, S. Oehninger, R. Menkveld, L. L. Veeck, and A. A. Acosta, Critical assessment of sperm morphology before and after double swim-up preparation for in vitro fertilization (IVF), In press, Arch. Androl.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Franken, S. Oehninger, L. Burkman, C. C. Coddington, T. F. Kruger, Z. Rosenwaks, A. A. Acosta, G. D. Hodgen, The hemizona assay (HZA): A predictor of human sperm fertilizing potential in IVF treatment, J. In Vitro Fert. Embryo Transfer, 6:44 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Oehninger, C. C. Coddington, R. Scott, D. Franken, L. Burkman, A. A. Acosta, and G. D. Hodgen, Hemizona assay: Assessment of sperm dysfunction and predictor of in vitro fertilization outcome, Fertil. Steril., 51 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. J. Veeck, Oocyte assessment and biological performance, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 541:259 (1988).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. V. N. Bolton, S. M. Hawes, C. T.Taylor, J. H. Parsons, Development of spare human preimplantation embryos in vitro, An analysis of the correlations among gross morphology, cleavage rates, and development to the blastocyst, J. In Vitro Fert. Embryo Transfer, 6:30 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. J. M. Cummins, T. M. Breen, K. L. Harrison, J. M. Shaw, L. M. Wilson, J. F. Hennessey, A formula for scoring human embryo growth rates in in vitro fertilization: It’s value in predicting pregnancy and in comparison with visual estimates of embryo quality, J. In Vitro Fert. Embryo Transfer, 3:284 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. F. Puissant, M. Rysselberge, P. Barlow, J. Deweze, and F. Leroy, Embryo scoring as a prognostic tool in IVF treatment, Hum. Reprod., 2:705 (1987).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. P. Claman, A. D. Randall, M. M. Seibel, T. Wang, S. P. Oskowitz, and M I. Taymoor, The impact of embryo quality and quantity on implantation and the establishment of viable pregnancies, J. In Vitro Fert. Embryo Transfer, 4:218 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Plachot, J. De Grouchy, A. M. Junca, J. Mandelbaum, J. Salat- Baroux, and J. Cohen, Chromosomal analysis of human oocytes and embryos in an in vitro fertilization program, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 541:384 (1988).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. R. H. Martin, M. Mahadevan, P. J. Taylor, K. Hildebrand, L. Long- Simpson, D. Peterson, J. Yamamoto, and J. Fleetham, Chromosomal analysis of unfertilized human oocytes, J. Reprod. Fertil., 78:673 (1986).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. H. Wramsby, K. Fredga, and P. Liedholm, Chromosomal analysis of human oocytes recovered from preovulatory follicles in stimulated cycles, New Engl. J. Med., 316:121 (1987).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. H. Wramsby, Chromosomal analysis of preovulatory human oocytes and oocytes failing to cleave following insemination in vitro. Annal of the New York Academy of Sciences, 541:228 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Shlomo Mashiach M.D. Zion Ben-Rafael M.D. Neri Laufer M.D. Joseph G. Schenker M.D.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Veeck, L.L. (1990). Pregnancy Rate and Pregnancy Outcome Associated with Laboratory Evaluation of Spermatozoa, Oocytes, and Pre-Embryos. In: Mashiach, S., Ben-Rafael, Z., Laufer, N., Schenker, J.G. (eds) Advances in Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0645-0_79

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0645-0_79

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7907-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0645-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics