Abstract
During an informal presentation given for interested departmental colleagues several years ago, I characterized personality psychology as a discipline concerned to provide theoretically based explanations for and hence an understanding of the behavior/psychological functioning of individuals. Immediately, a colleague with scholarly interests in the area of sensation/perception challenged the adequacy of my circumscription of the field on the grounds that, in the final analysis, it would fail to differentiate the study of personality from various other subdisciplines of psychology. Conceding that he was probably correct on this point, I hastened to add that, for reasons once well put by Gordon Allport, that prospect did not particularly trouble me:
Every mental function is embedded in personal life. In no concrete sense is there such a thing as intelligence, space perception, color discrimination, or choice reaction; there are only people who are capable of performing such activities and of having such experiences (Allport, 1937, p. 18).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Rinehart & Winston.
Allport, G. W, & Odbert, H. S. (1936). TYait names: A psycholexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47, (211).
Bakan, D. (1966). The test of significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 423–437.
Bandura, A. (1978). The self system in reciprocal determinism. American Psychologist, 33, 344–358.
Bem, D. J., & Allen, A. (1974). On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior. Psychological Review, 81, 506–520.
Buss, D. M., & Craik, K. H. (1984). Acts, dispositions, and personality. In B. A. Maher, & W B. Maher (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 13, pp. 241–301). New York: Academic Press.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.
Cattell, R. B. (1944). Psychological measurement: Normative, ipsative, interactive. Psychological Review, 51, 292–303.
Conger, A. J. (1983). Toward a further understanding of the intuitive personologist: Some critical evidence on the diabolical quality of subjective psychometrics. Journal of Personality, 51, 248–258.
Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.
Dar, R. (1987). Another look at Meehl, Lakatos, and the scientific practices of psychologists. American Psychologist, 42, 145–151.
DeWaele, J. P. (1985). The significance of action psychology for personality research and assessment. In J. P. Ginsburg, M. Brenner, & M. von Cranach (Eds.), Discovery strategies in the psychology of action (pp. 115–170). London: Academic Press.
Epstein, S. (1979). The stability of behavior: I. On predicting most of the people most of the time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1097–1126.
Epstein, S. (1983). Aggregation and beyond: Some basic issues in the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality, 51, 360–362.
Fesbach, S. (1984). The “personality” of personality theory and research. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 446–456.
Fiske, D. W. (1978). Cosmopolitan constructs and provincial observations: Some prescriptions for a chronically ill specialty. In H. London (Ed.), Personality: A new look at metatheories (pp. 21–43). New York: Wiley.
Harré, R. (1981). The positivist-empiricist approach and its alternative. In P. Reason & J. Rowan (Eds.), Human Inquiry (pp. 3–17). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Kendrick, D. T, & Stringfield, D. O. (1980). Personality traits and the eye of the beholder: Crossing some traditional philosophical boundaries in the search for consistency in all of the people. Psychological Review, 87, 88–104.
Kerlinger, F. N., & Pedhazur, E. J. (1973). Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Kleinmuntz, B. (1967). Personality measurement: An introduction. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
Lamiell, J. T. (1981). Toward an idiothetic psychology of personality. American Psychologist, 34 276–289.
Lamiell, J. T. (1987). The psychology of personality: An epistemological inquiry. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lamiell, J. T, & Durbeck, P. K. (1987). Whence cognitive prototypes in impression formation? Some empirical evidence for dialectical reasoning as a generative process. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 8,223–244.
Lamiell, J. T, Foss, M. A., Larsen, R. J., & Hempel, A. (1983). Studies in intuitive personology from an idiothetic point of view: Implications for personality theory. Journal of Personality, 51, 438–467.
Lamiell, J. T, Foss, M. A., Trierweiler, S. J., & Leffel, G. M. (1983). Toward a further understanding of the intuitive personologist: Some preliminary evidence for the dialectical quality of subjective personality impressions. Journal of Personality, 53,213–235.
Lamiell, J. T, Trierweiler, S. J., & Foss, M. A. (1983). Theoretical vs. actuarial analyses of personality ratings, and other rudimentary distinctions. Journal of Personality, 51, 259–274.
Maher, B. A. (1969). Clinical psychology and personality: The selected papers of George Kelly. New York: Wiley.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T, Jr. (1986). Clinical assessment can benefit from recent advances in personality psychology. American Psychologist, 41,1001–1003. (Comment).
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T, Jr. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
Meehl, P. E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress in soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806–834.
Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. London: Oxford University Press.
Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Robinson, D. N. (1984). On reasons and causes. In J. R. Royce & L. P. Mos (Eds.),Annals of Theoretical Psychology (Vol. 2, pp.157–163). New York: Plenum.
Robinson, D. N. (1985). Philosophy of psychology. New York: Columbia University Press.
Robinson, D. N. (1987). The logic of reductionist models. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, New York City, August, 1987.
Rorer, L. G., & Widiger, T A. (1983). Personality structure and assessment. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.),Annual Review of Psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 431–463). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, Inc.
Ross, A. O. (1987). Personality: The scientific study of complex human behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Rychlak, J. F. (1981a). A philosophy of science for personality theory (2nd ed.). Malabar, FL: Kreiger.
Rychlak, J. F. (1981b). Logical learning theory: Propositions, corollaries, and research evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 731–749.
Sanford, N. (1963). Personality: Its place in psychology. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of Science (Vol. 5, pp. 488–592). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Schneider, D. J. (1973). Implicit personality theory: A review. Psychological Review, 79, 294–309.
Sechrest, L. (1976). Personality. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology,(Vol. 27, pp. 1–27). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, Inc.
Solomon, R. C. (1983). In the spirit of Hegel. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tomkins, S. S. (1965). Affect and the psychology of knowledge. In S. S. Tbmkins & C. E. Izard (Eds.),Affect, cognition and personality (pp. 72–97). New York: Springer.
Tyler, L. (1978). Individuality: Human possibilities and personal choice in the psychological development of men and women. San Francisco: JosseyBass.
Wiggins, J. S. (1973). Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Wiggins, J S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37,395–412.
Woody, E. Z. (1983). The intuitive personologist revisited. A critique of dialectical person perception. Journal of Personality, 51, 236–258.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lamiell, J.T. (1990). Explanation in the Psychology of Personality. In: Robinson, D.N., Mos, L.P. (eds) Annals of Theoretical Psychology. Annals of Theoretical Psychology, vol 6. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0631-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0631-3_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7901-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0631-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive