Infertility pp 145-156 | Cite as

Uterine Factors

  • Melvin L. Taymor


Problems with the uterus itself are not a common cause of infertility. However, since the cause still remains unknown in many cases and since new methods are being made available for both physiologic and endoscopic evaluation of the uterus, the physician should not rule out the uterine factor, at least in those cases that fail to resolve themselves with routine techniques. Two excellent reviews, by Wallach and Patton, have been published.1,2


Uterine Fibroid Endometrial Cavity Special Diagnostic Test Bicornuate Uterus Septate Uterus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Wallach E: The uterine factor in infertility. Fertil Seril 23:138, 1972Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Patton GW Jr: The uterus in infertility evaluation. In Behram SJ, Kistner RW, Patton GW Jr (eds): Progress in Infertility, 3rd ed., Boston, Little, Brown, 1988, p 197Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jones HW, Baramki TA: Congenital anomalies. In Behrman S J and Kistner RW (eds): Progress in Infertility, 1st ed. Boston, Little, Brown, 1968Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kistner RW, Patton GW Jr: Atlas of Infertility Surgery. Boston, Little Brown, 1975, pp 65–93Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Strassman EO: Operations for double uterus and endometrial atresia. Clin Obstet Gynecol 4:210, 1961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jones HW Jr: Operations for congenital anomalies of the uterus and vagina. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2:1053, 1959PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tompkins P: Comments on the bicornuate uterus and twinning. Surg Clin North Am 42:1049, 1962PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Strassmann E: Fertility and unification of double uterus. Fertil Steril 17:165, 1966PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McShane PM, Reilly RS, Schiff I: Pregnancy outcomes following Tompkins metroplasty. Fertil Steril 40:190, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rubin IC: Uterine fibromyomas and sterility. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1:501, 1958PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bonney V: Abdominal myomectomy. In: Gynecologic Surgery. London, Cassell, p. 328, 1963Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ingersoll FM: Fertility following myomectomy. Fertil Steril 14:596, 1963PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Babaknia A, Rock JA, Jones HW: Pregnancy success following abdominal myomectomy for infertility. Fertil Steril 30:644, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Buttram VC, Reiter RC: Uterine leiomyomata: Etiology, symptomology and management. Fertil Steril 36:433, 1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Garcia CR, Tureck RW: Submucosal leiomyomata and infertility. Fertil Steril 42:16, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rosenfeld DL: Abdominal myomectomy for otherwise unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril 46:328, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    West CP, Lumsden WA, Lawson S, Williamson J, Baird DT: Shrinkage of uterine fibroid during therapy with goselerin (Zoladex): A leutinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist administered as a monthly subcutaneous depot. Fertil Steril 48:45, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Asherman JG: Amenorrhea traumatica (atretica). J Obstet Gynecol Br Commonw 55:23, 1948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Klein S, Garcia CR: Asherman’s syndrome: A critique and review. Fertil Steril 24:905, 1973Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cohen MR, Dmowshi WP: Modern hysteroscopy: Diagnostic therapeutic potential. Fertil Steril 24:905, 1973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bergman P: Traumatic intrauterine lesions. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 40 (Suppl 4):1, 1961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Valle RF, Sciarra JS: Intrauterine adhesions: Hysteroscopic diagnosis classification, treatment and reproductive outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 158:1459, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Louros NC, Danezis JM, Pontifix G: Use of intrauterine devices in the treatment of intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 19:509, 1968PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wood J, Pena G: Treatment of traumatic uterine synechiae. Int J Fertil 9:405, 1964PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Glebatis DM, Janerich DT: A statewide approach to diethylstilbestrol—the New York Program. N Engl J Med 304:47, 1981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    DeCherney AH, Naftolin F: Diethylstilbestrol effect in fertility. In Behrman SJ, Kistner RW, Patton GW Jr (eds): Progress in Infertility, 3rd ed. Boston, Little, Brown, 1988, p 227Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Herbst AL, Hubby MM, Blough RR, Azizi FA: A comparison of pregnancy experience in DES-exposed and DES-unexposed daughters. J Reprod Med 24:62, 1980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Barnes A, Colton T, Gunderson J, et al: Fertility and outcome of pregnancy in women exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol. N Engl J Med 303:281, 1980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Muasher ST, Garcia JE, Jones HW Jr: Experience with diethylstilbestrol-exposed infertile women in a program of in-vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 42:20, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Goldstein DP: Incompetent cervix in offspring exposed to diethylstilbestrol in utero. Obstet Gynecol 52:738, 1978Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melvin L. Taymor
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations