Infertility pp 65-73 | Cite as

Evaluation of the Tubal Factor

  • Melvin L. Taymor


When the physician understands the functions of the fallopian tubes, he or she is better able to evaluate the tubal factor in infertiliy.


Luteinizing Hormone Tubal Patency Tubal Disease Tubal Factor Pelvic Adhesion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Settlage D, Fordney S, Motoshima M, Tredway D: Sperm transport from the external os to the fallopian tubes in women: A time and quantitative study. Fertil Steril 24:655, 1973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hafez ESE: Sperm transport. In Behrman SJ, Kistner RW (eds): Progress in Infertility, 2nd ed. Boston, Little, Brown, 1975, p 151Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Doyle JG: Tubo-ovarian mechanisms, observation at laparotomy. Obstet Gynecol 8:696, 1965Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yussman MA, Taymor ML: Serum levels of follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone and of plasma progesterone related to ovulation by corpus luteum biopsy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 30:396, 1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rubin IC: Non-operative determination of patency of fallopian tubes in sterility: A preliminary report. JAMA 74:1017, 1920Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maathius JB, Horbach JGM, Van Hall EV: A comparison of the results of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in the diagnosis of fallopian tube dysfunction. Fertil Steril 23:428, 1972Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moghissi KS, Sim GS: Correlation between hysterosalpingography and pelvic endoscopy for the evaluation of tubal factor. Fertil Steril 26:1178, 1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Swolin K, Rosenkrantz M: Laparoscopy vs. hysterosalpingography in sterility investigations. A comparative study. Fertil Steril 23:210, 1972Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hörne HW, Kosasa T: Quantitative method of evaluating the functional patency of human uterine tubes: Correlation with 61 laparotomy cases. Obstet Gynecol 39:3, 1972Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roland M, Clyman A: Further studies on the value of water-soluble media in hyster-osalpingography. Fertil Steril 17:605, 1966PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davis ME, Ward ME, King AG: An evaluation of the PSP (Speck) test for tubal patency. Fertil Steril 3:217, 1962Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Speck G: Revision of the PSP (Speck) test for tubal patency. Fertil Steril 1:328, 1950Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Israel S, Freed C: The PSP (Speck) test for tubal patency. Fertil Steril 1:328, 1950PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wahby O: Hysterosalpingography in relation to pregnancy and its outcome in infertile women. Fertil Steril 17:520, 1966PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Horbach JGM, Maathius JB, Van Hall EV: Factors influencing the pregnancy rate following hysterosalpingography and their prognostic significance. Fertil Steril 24:15, 1973PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melvin L. Taymor
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations