• Jennifer Glass
  • David M. Klein


The subject matter of this book, changing social institutions, is intended to familiarize scholars with the breadth and depth of changes in the American institutions that meet most of our major social needs. Almost all of the human endeavors that require structured social cooperation are touched on here—how we as a society form and maintain familial bonds, educate our children, produce and distribute material resources, treat the sick and infirm, disseminate information to the populace, define and promote national interests through government, and seek spiritual comfort and solace. All too often, the individual components of social systems are studied in isolation rather than as parts of an intricate whole, a tendency exacerbated by the trend toward specialization within sociology and the social sciences generally. The sheer amount of information to be absorbed and the magnitude and complexity of the social problems we face discourage most scholars from venturing far outside their own narrow domain. We hope this book will prove to be an antidote. This volume attempts to familiarize readers with the most important and most enduring changes in our social institutions as we enter the next century.


Labor Force Participation Social Institution Institutional Framework Union Membership Legal Profession 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Chapin, F. S. (1935). Contemporary American institutions. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  2. Cherlin, A. (1981). Marriage, divorce, remarriage. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Collins, R., McCarthy, J., Meyer, M., Oliver, P., & Turner, J. (1989). Future organizational trends of the ASA. Footnotes, 17, 1–5, 9.Google Scholar
  4. Hall, R. H. (1989). Review of Institutional patterns and organizations. Contemporary Sociology, 18, 54–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kantor, R. M. (1977). Work and family in the United States: A critical review and agenda for research and policy. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
  7. Sirjamaki, J. (1964). The institutional approach. In H. T. Christensen (Ed.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 33–50 ). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  8. Smelser, N. (1959). Social change in the industrial revolution: An application of theory to the Lancashire cotton industry, 1770–1840. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Smith, H. E. (1964). Toward a clarification of the concept of social institution. Sociology and Social Research, 48, 197–206Google Scholar
  10. Spencer,H. (1910). First principles. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. (Originally published in 1862 )Google Scholar
  11. Sumner, W. G. (1906). Folkways. Boston: Ginn.Google Scholar
  12. Thomas, D. L., & Wilcox, J. E. (1987). The rise of family theory: A historical and critical analysis. In M. B. Sussman & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 81–102 ). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  13. Zucker, L. G. (Ed.). (1988). Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment. Cambridge: Ballinger.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Glass
    • 1
  • David M. Klein
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA

Personalised recommendations