Performance Analysis of a Buffer Under Locking Protocols

  • E. G. CoffmanJr.
  • Leopold Flatto
  • D. P. GaverJr.

Abstract

This paper formulates and analyzes stochastic models of process communication in computer systems. Messages are entered in a buffer (mailbox) by a source, and removed by a sink, at rates that are allowed to differ. The source, following message entry, and the sink, following buffer depletion, leave the buffer for independent exponentially distributed periods of absence, with rate parameters λ and μ, respectively. Locking protocols are in effect, i.e., message entry and removal can not occur simultaneously. The decision of the source or sink arriving to find the buffer active can be to wait until it is free, or to leave on another period of absence. We apply the analysis to both the “wait” and “no wait” options.

A study of the fluid-approximation model shows that renewal theory forms the proper basis of the analysis; the important relevant results are briefly reviewed. These results along with renewal-theoretic arguments, especially those exploiting regenerative properties, are then applied to derivations of basic performance measures, e.g., transforms or expectations of busy periods and steady-state buffer levels. In particular, the formulas bring out the dependence of the expectations on the variance of message lengths. Desirable extensions of the models are sketched.

Keywords

Peaked 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aven, O., Coffman, E. G., Jr. and Kogan, Y., 1987, Stochastic Models of Computer Storage, Reidel Publ. (Note: see Chap. 2, Buffer Storage.)Google Scholar
  2. Feller, W., Vol. I, 1950; Vol. II (2nd ed.) 1971, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, John Wiley, New York. (Note: see Chap. XI of Vol. II, Renewal Theory) Google Scholar
  3. Gaver, D. P. and Jacobs, P. A., 1980, “Storage problems when demand is ‘all or nothing’,” Naval Res. Log. Quart., 27:529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gaver, D. P., and Jacobs P. A., 1986, “On inference and transient response for M/G/1 models,” Proc. Conference on Teletraffic Analysis and Computer Performance Evaluation-, O. J. Boxma, J. W. Cohen, H. C. Tijms (eds.), Elsevier Science Pubs., B. V. (North Holland), 163.Google Scholar
  5. Gaver, D. P., and Lehoczky, J. P., 1982, “Channels that cooperatively service a data stream and voice messages,” IEEE Trans. on Communications, 30:1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Karlin, S., and Taylor, H. M., 1975, A First Course in Stochastic Processes, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Mitra, D., 1988, “Stochastic Theory of a Fluid Model of Producers and Consumers Coupled by a Buffer,” Adv. Appl. Prob., 20:646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Neuts, M., 1981, Matrix-Geometric Solution in Stochastic Models: An Algorithmic Approach, Johns Hopkins Univ. Press. (Note: see Chap. 2: Probability Distribution of Phase Type) Google Scholar
  9. Ross, S. M., 1983, Stochastic Processes, John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Smith, W. L., 1955, “Regenerative stochastic processes,” Proc. Royal Statistical Soc., A, 232:6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Smith, W. L., 1958, “Renewal Theory and its ramifications,” J. of the Royal Statistical Soc., B, 20:243.Google Scholar
  12. Widder, D. V., 1946, The Laplace Transform, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. G. CoffmanJr.
    • 1
  • Leopold Flatto
    • 1
  • D. P. GaverJr.
    • 2
  1. 1.AT&T Bell LaboratoriesMurray HillUSA
  2. 2.Department of Operations ResearchNaval Postgraduate SchoolMontereyUSA

Personalised recommendations